In H1 2026, China’s aluminum extrusion industry ran under three clear traits: feeble domestic demand recovery, overseas demand sliding first then bouncing back, and a sharp split between booming and sluggish product segments.

June Price Review: The monthly average price of non-oriented silicon steel exhibited a bottoming-out decline in June. On the supply-demand front, the market shifted from a slight balance to a narrow undersupply, with fundamentals continuing to improve marginally. The oversupply that previously weighed on the market gradually eased, providing price support. Spot prices performed stronger than expected, edging down only slightly. As a transitional month shifting from off-season to peak season, the supply-demand pattern improved in June. Fundamental Analysis: China's production schedule for non-oriented silicon steel continued to decline in July. Comparing with the same period in previous years, the scheduled production in July 2026 was lower than that of July 2025. Analyzing by grade, the proportion of NEV grades in the July production schedule rebounded to 15%, high grades accounted for 19%, while the proportion of low and mid-end grades pulled back to 66%. Steel mills continued to adjust their product mix, with the scheduled production of conventional low and mid-end grades shrinking accordingly. While total scheduled production continued to contract, supply-side pressure persisted. Maintaining original production levels for NEV and high-grade resources while significantly reducing low and mid-end grades optimized the supply structure to some extent, supporting market resilience. Downstream demand for non-oriented silicon steel showed structural divergence in May. In the home appliance sector, total silicon steel consumption pulled back MoM, with air conditioners remaining the core demand driver. Demand from the automotive sector was strong, with silicon steel consumption climbing to a high level for the period in May. Specifically, passenger NEVs provided the largest support for automotive silicon steel demand. Overall, traditional demand from home appliances weakened marginally, while NEV demand continued to strengthen. The demand center shifted toward the automotive sector, generating structural benefits for high-grade and NEV-grade non-oriented silicon steel. July Price Outlook: Supply side, China's planned production schedule for non-oriented silicon steel continued to decrease in July 2026, with reductions primarily focused on low and mid-end grades. On one hand, the off-season impact became more pronounced, downstream demand was soft, and purchasing interest declined, curbing production activity. On the other hand, industry leaders like Baowu and Shougang kept base prices unchanged in July, prioritizing price stability, but bearish sentiment persisted, making prices more likely to fall than rise. Most producers were loss-making and cut production autonomously. Demand side, in the home appliance sector, enterprises slowed their production pace, with orders falling MoM. The 618 shopping festival provided no significant order stimulus. Affected by low demand, high inventory, and high costs, some enterprises cut their production schedules ahead of schedule, and the implementation of new energy efficiency standards for some appliance products led to model upgrades that restricted production. In the automotive sector, automakers generally maintained normal production paces, with some increasing production schedules this month to meet mid-year targets. However, the sales promotions of the 618 festival and policies yielded limited boosting effects, and sales pressure persisted. Breaking it down, NEVs remained the main sales driver this month, orders for internal combustion engine vehicles showed no significant improvement, and exports were mainly directed to markets such as Russia, South America, and Southeast Asia, with the industry's full-year export volume expected to reach 12 million units. Cost side, with steel mill profits continuing to shrink and expectations of normalized local environmental protection-driven production restrictions, hot metal production is expected to continue to pull back. But as the off-season impact expands, the average hot-rolled coil price in July is expected to decline further MoM from June, though the extent of the decline will narrow. In summary, SMM expects that prices for low and mid-end non-oriented silicon steel will drift lower overall in July 2026, with some room for price reductions.

On July 14, data from the General Administration of Customs showed that China exported 10.32 million mt of steel in June 2026, down 21,000 mt MoM or 0.2% MoM. Cumulative exports from January to June reached 54.874 million mt, down 5.6% YoY. In June 2026, China imported 441,000 mt of steel, down 10,000 mt MoM or 2.2% MoM. Cumulative imports from January to June were 2.696 million mt, down 11.3% YoY. Table 1: Overview of Steel Imports and Exports, January-June Source: SMM Steel Exports Remained High in June According to SMM's June export production schedule survey, planned HRC export volume for the month stood at 1.05 million mt, slightly lower than actual exports in May, with a relatively limited decline. Meanwhile, SMM export order data showed that steel export orders remained high in mid-April, laying the foundation for high steel exports in May-June. Table 2: China’s Total Steel Exports Source: SMM Steel Imports Stayed Low in June On the import side, steel imports in June were 441,000 mt, down MoM. January-June cumulative imports were 2.696 million mt, down 11.3% YoY. Net steel exports reached 52.178 million mt. Short-Term Steel Export Outlook 1. Global Manufacturing Declined MoM; Domestic New Export Orders Recovered Marginally According to J.P. Morgan global PMI data, the global manufacturing PMI stood at 52.2 in June 2026, still in expansion territory but with momentum slowing for a second consecutive month, mainly due to earlier stockpiling to avoid Middle East shipping risks, while preventive stockpiling demand waned in June. In addition, end-use consumer goods demand in Europe and the US was weak, global export orders fell below the 50 mark, and the ASEAN composite PMI dropped 1 point MoM, with regional sentiment cooling significantly. China's manufacturing new export orders index at 50.1% in June, up 1.5 percentage points MoM, pointed to a marginal recovery in external demand. 2. Supply Outside China Rose MoM; Overall Supply Pressure Intensified Global crude steel production fell 0.3% YoY to 157.9 million mt in May 2026. In China, against a severe backdrop of finished steel destocking falling short of expectations and losses, steel mills proactively brought forward maintenance plans to defensively control output. Excluding China, production in the rest of the world rose 28.8% YoY. The Asian market was unusually resilient, with India's crude steel production recording 14.1 million mt. Meanwhile, Vietnam's production surged 27.2% YoY, driven not by a stress response to trade barriers but by downstream manufacturing entering a concentrated stockpiling phase, coupled with genuine demand from infrastructure projects rushing to meet deadlines ahead of the monsoon season. In contrast, production in the Middle East plunged 19.4% YoY in May, with previous war damage from geopolitical conflicts and wartime energy controls remaining an invisible and heavy ceiling suppressing production resumptions in the region. Production regions in Europe and the US (the US up 9.2% YoY, Germany up 7.3% YoY) maintained relatively active operating rates, supported by new-type data center infrastructure and anticipatory moves to preempt regional trade barriers such as the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). It is reported that the Middle East recently started offering billet exports and concluded deals. Meanwhile, increased production in India, Vietnam and others also put some pressure on domestic exports. Figure 1: Global Crude Steel Production by Region Source: SMM 3. Price Advantage Narrowed Significantly; Pressure on Export Orders Intensified As of July 16, 2026, HRC export quotations (FOB) for India, Turkey, and the CIS were $510/mt, $408/mt, and $530/mt, respectively, while China's HRC export quotation (FOB) was $493/mt. Currently, China's HRC export quotations are $17/mt, $115/mt, and $37/mt lower than those countries. China's steel export price advantage narrowed significantly MoM from June. The overseas market remained in the off-season, and low-price export promotion remained the main channel for them to relieve domestic pressure. In China, prices remained relatively firm supported by costs. The price spread between Chinese and overseas markets narrowed markedly, intensifying pressure on export orders. Figure 2: HRC Quotations in Major Global Markets Source: SMM 4. Export Orders Remained at Low Levels in May-June; A Sudden Increase Is Difficult According to SMM's latest steel mill export order schedule, planned HRC exports for this month totaled 1.059 million mt, up 5.2% MoM from actual exports last month. SMM's steel export order data showed that due to the ongoing overseas off-season and consecutive overseas price declines, steel export orders in May-June declined significantly MoM from the previous period. Figure 3: SMM Steel Export Order Volumes Source: SMM 5. Anti-Dumping Cases with Impact Increased in June New anti-dumping related cases in China increased in June, involving products such as steel pipes, coated sheets, cold-rolled, stainless steel, hot-rolled, and medium-thickness plates. Details of the cases and their impact volumes are shown in the table below. Table 3: New Anti-Dumping Cases in June Source: SMM Overall, against the backdrop of the overseas off-season coupled with a narrowing price advantage, the weakness in earlier export orders may gradually be reflected in export data. SMM expects that actual steel exports in July will face some downward pressure. However, as overseas prices continue to pull back and hit bottom, some new procurement demand may be released. Figure 4: Steel Exports and Forecast, 2024-2026 Source: SMM Source Declaration: All data other than publicly available information is processed by SMM based on public information, market communication, and SMM's internal database models, and is for reference only and does not constitute any decision-making advice. Note: This article is original content of this official account. If you need to reprint, whitelist, or cooperate, please contact us. Without permission, no one may reprint, modify, use, sell, transfer, display, translate, compile, disseminate, or otherwise disclose the above content to any third party or permit any third party to use it. Otherwise, Shanghai Metals Market (SMM) will pursue legal liability for infringement, including but not limited to claiming contractual breach of contract liability, disgorgement of unjust enrichment, and compensation for direct and indirect economic losses. Scan to Get Free Information

Price Review for June: In June, the monthly average price of non-oriented silicon steel trended downward, probing the bottom. Supply-demand side, the market shifted from a slight balance to a mild undersupply, with fundamentals improving marginally. The oversupply that had been weighing on prices gradually eased, providing support for prices. Spot prices performed stronger than expected, edging down only slightly. As a transitional month between the off-season and peak season, June saw the supply-demand pattern improve. Fundamentals Analysis: The July production schedule for domestic non-oriented silicon steel is planned to decline further. Compared with the same period in previous years, the July 2026 schedule was lower than that of July 2025. In terms of grade structure, the proportion of NEV grades in the July schedule is expected to rebound to 15%, high grades at 19%, and low and mid-end grades pull back to 66%. Steel mills continue to adjust their product mix, leading to corresponding reductions in low-end conventional grades. Overall scheduled production volume continues to shrink, but supply-side pressure persists. Production levels for NEV and high-grade materials are maintained, while low and mid-end grades are significantly reduced, optimizing the supply structure to some extent and supporting price resilience. Downstream demand for non-oriented silicon steel in May showed structural divergence. Total silicon steel consumption in the home appliance sector edged down MoM, with air conditioners remaining the core demand driver. The automobile sector demand was strong, with silicon steel consumption climbing to a high for the period. Within this, passenger NEVs were the biggest support for non-oriented silicon steel demand in the auto sector. Overall, traditional home appliance demand weakened marginally, while NEV demand continued to strengthen, gradually shifting the demand center toward the auto track. This structurally benefited high-grade and NEV-grade non-oriented silicon steel. July Price Outlook: Looking ahead to July 2026, on the supply side, China's non-oriented silicon steel production schedule is planned to decline further, primarily in low and mid-end grades. On one hand, the off-season impact is becoming more pronounced: downstream demand is weak, purchasing enthusiasm has fallen, weighing on production willingness. On the other hand, leading producers such as Baowu and Shougang kept their July base prices unchanged, prioritizing price stability. However, market sentiment is bearish and prices are more likely to fall than rise. Most producers are operating at a loss and implementing voluntary production cuts. On the demand side, in the home appliance industry, producers slowed their production pace, with orders declining MoM. The "618" shopping festival did not significantly stimulate orders. Affected by low demand, high inventory, and high costs, some enterprises lowered their production schedules ahead of time. Additionally, new energy efficiency standards for certain home appliances were introduced, limiting production due to product iteration. In the automobile industry, automakers mostly maintained normal production pace, with some increasing output this month to meet mid-year targets. However, sales pressure remained due to moderate effects of the "618" promotions and policy support. Breaking it down, NEVs remained the main sales driver this month, while orders for internal combustion engine vehicles did not improve significantly. Exports were mainly directed to Russia, South America, and Southeast Asia. Total annual export volume for the industry is expected to reach 12 million units. Cost side, with steel mill profits continuing to shrink and local environmental protection-driven production restrictions becoming normalized, hot metal production is expected to decline further. However, as the impact of the off-season expands, the July average hot-rolled coil price is expected to decline further MoM from June, with the decrease narrowing. Overall, SMM expects that mid- and low-grade non-oriented silicon steel prices in July 2026 will drift lower as a whole, with room for price declines. Data Source Statement: (All data in this report, other than publicly available information, are based on publicly available information (including but not limited to industry news, seminars, exhibitions, corporate financial reports, broker reports, NBS data, customs import and export data, and various data released by major associations and institutions), market communication, and SMM's internal database models. The research team has conducted comprehensive analysis and made reasonable inferences, which are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making advice. SMM reserves the right of final interpretation of the terms of this statement and the right to adjust and modify the content of the statement in accordance with actual conditions.

Overall, the supply-demand fundamentals of the prebaked anode market are expected to remain stable in H2, but against the backdrop of continuous new capacity release, industry competition may intensify, and price trends will be more influenced by cost-side disruptions and downstream procurement pace.

South Korea's steel exports showed signs of recovery amid strong global demand for AI data center construction. According to South Korea's Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, steel exports reached 2.14 billion USD in June, up 9.6% year-on-year, marking the first export growth in 14 months. The US market was the main driver, with steel export volume to the US rising 58.3% in the first half to 2.2 million tonnes from 1.39 million tonnes. Notably, exports of reinforcing bars used in data center framework construction surged to about 483,500 tonnes from 14,560 tonnes a year earlier.

Price Trends In the first half of 2026, domestic lithium hydroxide prices followed a trajectory of "surge – high-level volatility – softening decline," with the price center first rising and then falling amid the interplay of multiple factors. January: Prices surged sharply. Concentrated maintenance shutdowns at major lithium salt producers tightened spot supply. Combined with persistently rising costs of lithium carbonate and lithium ore, lithium salt producers held firm on pricing, pushing the monthly average price up by 65% month-on-month. Although ternary material manufacturers maintained just-in-time procurement and remained cautious on spot orders, and some import flows returned due to domestic-international price spreads, the phase of supply shortages and cost support still drove prices to a high level. February: Prices fluctuated at high levels with thinning trading. Macro sentiment drove overall lithium prices downward, but producers' firm pricing stance persisted. Downstream ternary manufacturers, having ample inventories and some entering maintenance, saw eased raw material shortages, with procurement mostly based on monthly average prices. During the Chinese New Year holiday, transportation of lithium hydroxide, classified as hazardous chemicals, stalled, leading to a seasonal quiet period; post-holiday restocking demand was tepid, limiting upside momentum, and prices oscillated widely throughout the month. March: Gains narrowed notably. Cell manufacturers' offtake fell short of expectations, and new orders for ternary materials were limited. Additionally, increased customer-supplied materials in mid-month sharply reduced spot demand, leading to subdued trading and an upward price channel that stalled. The monthly average price rose only 3.4% month-on-month. April: First down then up. In the first half, limited new ternary orders and scarce spot demand put mild pressure on prices; in the second half, pre-holiday stocking and new orders drove increased inquiries from ternary producers, while sharp rises in lithium carbonate and ore prices pulled lithium hydroxide higher. The monthly average price rose 2.73% month-on-month. May: Rose then fell. In the first half, positive demand expectations and supply-side disruptions lifted lithium carbonate and ore prices, pulling lithium hydroxide higher in tandem; in the second half, sentiment turned weaker, with more trades settled via negotiation between traders and material mills. As ternary demand trends became clearer, upstream producers softened their price support, prompting a modest pullback. The monthly average price reached RMB 174,000/ton, up 13.6% month-on-month. June: Prices fell notably, with range-bound volatility intensifying. Frequent supply disruptions on the lithium resource side amplified market volatility significantly, prompting holders to adopt a cautious stance and quote prices in line with market conditions. Upstream producers adjusted prices flexibly, while traders maintained a high discount (over RMB 15,000/ton against the lithium carbonate futures main contract). On the demand side, total ternary material demand remained weak month-on-month, but within the RMB 135,000–145,000/ton range, downstream buyers showed strong willingness to stockpile on dips, providing some bottom support and exacerbating range-bound fluctuations. The monthly average price fell 11.52% month-on-month. Looking at the price trends, the correlation between lithium hydroxide prices and lithium carbonate futures prices has strengthened over the past six months. This is partly because upstream producers use a "lithium carbonate price × discount factor" formula as a floor price in their pricing. On the other hand, traders capitalize on the price spreads between domestic and overseas lithium hydroxide and between hydroxide and carbonate, by importing lithium hydroxide and pricing their sales with reference to lithium carbonate futures, further reinforcing this price linkage. Production In the first half of 2026, domestic total lithium hydroxide output reached 172,000 tons, up 21% year-on-year, driven by relatively robust downstream demand, with notable incremental growth. By output structure, the refining segment contributed the most, accounting for about 88%. Within this, the gradual ramp-up of new production lines at leading companies added some volume, while other enterprises maintained steady output backed by downstream orders, resulting in an 18% year-on-year increase for the overall refining segment. For the causticization segment, most active producers sustained stable operations, and the industry CR5 reached 72% in the first half, indicating a persistently high market concentration. From the capacity utilization perspective, although some capacity has been switched to lithium carbonate production, the operating rate for the lithium hydroxide industry has consistently lingered below 50% over the past six months, reflecting an ongoing overcapacity trend. Costs and margins: For the refining segment, lithium ore feedstock remained relatively tight in the first half of 2026, with ore prices staying elevated and closely correlated with lithium carbonate prices, providing strong cost support for lithium hydroxide. As a result, non‑integrated producers faced notable pressure on the sales side, and their product discount prices did not decline further, which in turn provided marginal support for profit margins at current price levels. For the causticization segment, the supply of salt‑lake‑based lithium salts has increased over the past six months, making causticization feedstock relatively ample. The linkage between actual procurement costs and industrial‑grade carbonate quotes has weakened, which has alleviated cost pressures for enterprises that purchase lithium carbonate externally, leading to actual profitability in the causticization segment being better than theoretical estimates. Import and Export The import‑export landscape has seen a notable reversal. On the export front, since the second half of 2025, some overseas ternary material producers have shifted to entrusting domestic tolling processors, resulting in products that would have been exported being delivered domestically instead, effectively suppressing export volumes. At the same time, overseas demand for ternary materials has remained persistently weak, reducing foreign buyers' appetite for Chinese lithium hydroxide. This, combined with the gradual ramp‑up of overseas local production lines, has collectively kept export volumes at low levels over the past six months. On the import side, weak overseas demand, high accumulated inventories, and arbitrage opportunities have driven import volumes to remain relatively elevated, further reinforcing the net import trend. Supply‑Demand Balance and Inventory The surge in import data made most months in the first half of the year oversupplied. However, from the perspective of directly usable lithium hydroxide products, the market as a whole remained in a relatively tight balance, providing effective support for upstream price control. As for inventory, current lithium hydroxide stock levels have improved significantly compared with the same period last year. This is mainly attributable to two factors: first, part of the inventory has been absorbed into the market by being converted into lithium carbonate; second, active producers have flexibly adjusted their output pace, keeping current inventory days at around one month. Future Outlook Looking ahead, although the LFP route continues to squeeze the ternary route, ternary materials currently have no rival in the high‑nickel segment. In addition, the cost advantages of 6‑series materials offer more possibilities for the ternary route. Based on end‑user production schedules, ternary power demand in the second half of 2026 is expected to maintain a sound performance, growing by approximately 36% compared with the first half. This will drive a roughly 7% sequential increase in ternary material output in the second half. As ternary materials continue to move toward higher nickel content, this brings an incremental demand trend for lithium hydroxide. Meanwhile, considering that most lithium hydroxide production lines have flexible switching or carbonation purification capabilities, lithium hydroxide output is projected to grow by about 6% sequentially. Coupled with a modest recovery in overseas ternary demand, the supply‑demand balance for lithium hydroxide is expected to remain tight through 2026–2027. In terms of price, under a market structure with highly concentrated supply, lithium hydroxide prices are primarily determined by the supply‑demand dynamics of its own industrial chain and closely track lithium ore and lithium salt price trends. Prices are currently oscillating in a range above RMB 150,000/ton. Futures Developments As for lithium hydroxide futures, there has been a flurry of related developments in the second quarter. The Guangzhou Futures Exchange (GFEX) and the Lithium Branch of the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association have both explicitly stated that they will continue to strengthen cooperation and jointly advance the listing of lithium hydroxide and other lithium‑chain futures products. The征求意见稿 of Guangzhou's "15th Five‑Year Plan" for finance also clearly supports GFEX in listing new‑energy futures such as lithium hydroxide. On the industrial side, companies have moved swiftly to follow up. In June, Yahua Group, Shengxin Lithium Energy, and Tianqi Lithium all announced their intention to apply to GFEX for designated delivery factory warehouse status for lithium hydroxide. In addition, Milkyway's shareholders' meeting approved a proposal for its subsidiary to apply to become a designated delivery warehouse for battery‑grade lithium hydroxide at GFEX. According to media reports, lithium salt producers (Ganfeng Lithium, Tianqi Lithium, Yahua Group, etc.) have already positioned themselves in the factory‑warehouse system. However, due to the high‑risk storage requirements of lithium hydroxide—such as strong corrosiveness, exothermic reaction with water, and the need for inert gas protection—no logistics‑focused player had previously entered this category. On the market front, some traders have already made early arrangements in anticipation of futures listing, and the number of merchants participating in lithium hydroxide import trade has noticeably increased. In summary, preparations for the listing of lithium hydroxide futures are progressing in an orderly manner, with positive official signals and accelerating industrial infrastructure development.

SMM, July 12: In the first half of 2026, China's aluminum extrusion industry presented an extreme pattern of structural divergence. Traditional construction extrusion demand remained persistently weak, dragging down the industry’s overall operating load, while industrial extrusion maintained high prosperity, underpinned by new energy, power, and heat dissipation sectors, serving as the core pillar of the industry. Meanwhile, linked volatility in aluminum prices intensified both in and outside China, with the price spread repeatedly narrowing. The export market experienced a "deep V-shaped recovery" trajectory, and the overall industry performance was characterized by "weak recovery in domestic demand, initial suppression followed by recovery in overseas demand, and a stark contrast between strong and weak structural segments." 1. Extrusion Operating Rates: Construction Extrusion Continued to Drag, Industrial Extrusion Resilience Supported the Industry After the 2026 Chinese New Year, the industry entered its traditional peak season for resuming work. In March, extrusion enterprises concentrated on production resumptions and downstream clients engaged in concentrated restocking, pushing the industry's composite operating rate to its H1 peak of 50.6%. Entering Q2, genuine downstream demand follow-through was insufficient, raw material prices fluctuated at high levels, and the industry was further impacted by the rainy season in south China and environmental protection inspections in some regions. As a result, the industry operating rate continued to pull back mildly, falling to 47.6% in June, with the overall operating level weaker than the average for the same period over the past three years. Construction extrusion was the core weak spot dragging down the industry’s overall operations. In H1, data on commercial housing transactions and new construction starts in China remained persistently weak; developers' financial positions showed no significant improvement, and payment returns from project sites were slow. Orders for housing construction-related doors, windows, and curtain wall extrusions continued to shrink. From January to May, domestic aluminum prices generally consolidated at highs, and downstream end-users exhibited strong resistance to high-priced raw materials. Traders and processing plants generally maintained low inventory levels, moving goods in and out quickly, with low willingness to initiate restocking. Although the industry actively expanded non-residential construction demand from industrial parks, standard factories, and government and enterprise public buildings, and home decoration for existing home renovations and home decoration retail recovered slightly, the incremental volume was limited, completely failing to offset the decline in bulk project orders. In H1, construction extrusion operations remained under pressure, making it the biggest drag on the industry. The structural prosperity of the industrial extrusion segment continued to rise, strongly underpinning the industry's operating rates. Demand for power transmission and transformation, energy storage structural components, industrial heat dissipation extrusions, and rail transit supporting profiles maintained steady growth. For PV extrusion, affected by the official cancellation of the export tax rebate policy for PV-related products on April 1, overseas clients concentrated on front-loading orders and enterprises rushed to meet production deadlines in Q1, driving the operating rates for PV frames and mounting extrusions to stage a temporary surge. After the policy took effect, the bonus from overseas rush orders faded, and PV extrusion production schedules returned to rationality, maintaining stable operation from April to June. NEV extrusions showed structural divergence: demand for lightweight extrusions for auto body and chassis remained robust, while demand for ordinary interior extrusions weakened. Overall, the resonance of prosperity across multiple industrial extrusion tracks effectively offset the weak demand for traditional construction materials, highlighting the structural resilience of the industry. 2. Aluminum Extrusion Exports: Deeply Under Pressure in Q1, Continuous Recovery in Q2, V-Shaped Reversal in H1 In H1 2026, China's aluminum extrusion exports followed a V-shaped trend overall, with a sharp decline in Q1 followed by consecutive recoveries in Q2. The driving logic shifted from price inversions and off-season effects overseas at the beginning of the year, towards the release of demand in emerging markets and the transfer of China's processing and manufacturing advantages. Q1: Domestic and Overseas Aluminum Price Inversions Combined with Overseas Off-Season Led to Sharply Weaker Exports Exports from January to February showed off-season resilience, mainly supported by deliveries for orders placed ahead of the Chinese New Year. In January, China exported 81,000 mt of aluminum extrusions, up slightly by 1.4% MoM but down slightly by 5.3% YoY. In February, disruptions from the Chinese New Year holiday saw exports fall to 64,000 mt, a 20.4% MoM decrease but a sharp 62% YoY increase, significantly outperforming the precipitous declines of past Chinese New Year periods. The core reason was that secondary aluminum extrusion enterprises in Guangdong and Fujian concentrated on delivering orders for Southeast Asia and the Middle East before the holiday, while some industrial extrusion enterprises adopted a model of "preliminary domestic processing and deep processing overseas" to speed up contract fulfillment, supporting export volumes at the start of the year. In March, industry exports hit their low point for the first half of the year, with monthly exports of only 48,000 mt, down 24.8% MoM and plunging 32.8% YoY. The core reason for this export slump was not a single geopolitical factor but the resonance of multiple negative factors: first, orders placed ahead of the Chinese New Year overdrew demand from February and March, after which overseas markets entered the traditional consumption off-season; second, LME aluminum saw wild swings in March, and domestic and overseas aluminum prices quickly inverted, compressing export profits for domestic extrusions and leading enterprises to proactively control volumes and take fewer orders; third, the European and US CBAM carbon tariff continued to suppress high-end extrusion exports, causing continuous market shrinkage there, coupled with a slowdown in logistics and customs clearance in some Middle Eastern regions. These multiple factors caused a substantial pullback in export volumes in March. Q2: Emerging Market Volume Surge, Exports See Double YoY and MoM Growth for Two Consecutive Months Starting in April, the price spread between China and overseas markets gradually recovered, the overseas off-season ended, and industry exports began a continuous recovery channel. Exports that month were 76,000 mt, surging 56.8% MoM and up 6.9% YoY, returning to the normal range for past years. Trade and logistics order in the Middle East recovered, stockpiling in Southeast Asia ahead of the rainy season began, and domestic enterprises accelerated their layout in emerging markets in Central Asia and Latin America. Leveraging overseas affiliated warehouses and cross-border stockpiling models to continuously take on rigid demand orders for overseas doors, windows, and curtain walls, export prosperity recovered rapidly. Exports in May continued their high-growth momentum, hitting the monthly peak for H1 at 87,000 mt, up 14.6% MoM and 20.1% YoY. The export structure continued to optimize; low-end construction extrusions saw steady incremental growth, while the export share of high-value-added industrial aluminum components, outdoor aluminum semis, and PV supporting extrusions continued to rise. Southeast Asia, Australia, South America, and Central Asia became the four core growth markets for domestic extrusion exports, effectively offsetting the shrinking demand in European and US markets. 3. H2 2026 Industry Outlook: Weakly Stable Domestic Demand, Marginal Export Weakness, Continued Structural Divergence Looking ahead to H2 2026, the structural divergence pattern in China's aluminum extrusion industry is expected to become further entrenched, with overall operations characterized by "consolidation on a subdued note, industrial support, and construction material drag." On the domestic demand side, the fundamentals of the real estate sector are hard-pressed to see a substantive repair in the short term. Commercial housing new starts and project payment returns are expected to remain weak, and construction extrusion demand will continue to operate in a low range without a trending recovery. Non-residential infrastructure and home decoration retail can only provide a slight offset, unable to reverse the overall weakness of construction extrusions. Industrial extrusion will remain the core pillar of the industry: in H2, steady climbing of domestic PV installations will drive the continued release of demand for PV frames and mounting extrusions; demand for new-type energy storage, data center heat dissipation, and power equipment extrusions will maintain steady incremental growth. NEV extrusions will show a divergence between strong and weak segments; demand for high-end lightweight structural components will be firm, but overall industry overcapacity and intensifying end-user competition will exert marginal contraction pressure on demand for ordinary automotive extrusions. Overall, industrial extrusion can defend the industry’s baseline but can hardly offset the downward pressure from construction extrusions. In H2, the industry's overall operating rate may be slightly lower than in H1. Pressure on the export front will gradually emerge, with the trend potentially turning from the high growth of Q2 to a mild slowdown. In H2, the bonus from overseas traditional peak seasons will gradually fade, while the domestic-overseas aluminum price spread narrows, export processing profits are compressed, and overseas local aluminum processing capacity continues to be released, alongside persistent trade barriers against Chinese aluminum semis in some countries. This will gradually weaken the price advantage of domestic extrusion exports. Although secondary aluminum extrusion exports may still hold cost advantages, homogenized competition in low-end products is fierce and profits remain compressed. The export growth rate for aluminum extrusions is expected to slow down gradually in H2, with overall volumes weaker than in Q2. In summary, throughout 2026, the aluminum extrusion industry is expected to continuously exhibit structural characteristics of weak construction, strong industrial, stable but weak domestic demand, and exports that are high in the first half and low in the second. Industry competition will further concentrate on high-end industrial extrusion, high-value-added deep processing, and overseas emerging markets, with low-end construction extrusion capacity continuously entering a phase of being cleared.

Overall, the main theme of the Indonesia and Philippines nickel ore market in H1 2026 can be summarized as follows: policy is redefining Indonesia’s supply boundary, HPM is redefining resource value, ore grade decline is redefining the long-term cost floor, and Philippine ore is increasingly acting as the marginal balancing source.

In H1 2026, Shanghai aluminum prices followed a high-first-then-low trajectory. In Q1, a mix of market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East drove aluminum prices to multi-year highs. Entering Q2, confirmation of the US strong-dollar policy stance, easing supply disruptions in the Middle East, and a seasonal lull in domestic downstream consumption combined to push the aluminum price center downward continuously. Looking ahead to H2, persistent strong US dollar sentiment and overseas liquidity concerns will cap non-ferrous metal valuations. On the supply side, elevated aluminum prices have incentivized higher production releases; domestic operating capacity is projected to rise month-on-month, while newly commissioned capacity in the Middle East and Indonesia will ramp up output gradually. On the demand side, domestic consumption recovery is set to remain modest. Existing export order backlogs will still prop up aluminum semi-finished product shipments, yet market expectations for new export orders have softened. All told, Shanghai aluminum’s price center is likely to slide further in H2, delivering a full-year high-first-then-low price pattern. 1. H1 2026 Shanghai Aluminum Price Review by Stage 1.1 Q1: Macroeconomics & Geopolitics Dominate, Aluminum Prices Surge Then Consolidate Shanghai aluminum prices in Q1 2026 were primarily dictated by macro sentiment and overseas supply disruptions, with seasonally weak fundamentals taking a backseat. January: Rate Cut Expectations & Capital Inflows Fuel Price Rally Fundamentals: A seasonal lull ahead of the Lunar New Year created demand weakness, leading to a continuous build-up of social aluminum ingot inventories. By late January, SMM-tracked social inventories hit 782,000 tonnes, the highest level for the period in three years. Sustained high aluminum margins squeezed profit margins for downstream processors, dampening their willingness to operate and curbing primary aluminum purchasing activity. Macroeconomics: Markets priced in an impending Fed rate-cut cycle, sending the US Dollar Index sharply lower and drawing heavy speculative capital into commodity futures. Complementary pro-consumption policies rolled out domestically further underpinned aluminum prices. SMM’s average A00 aluminum price stood at RMB 24,086/tonne in January, the highest monthly average in H1. February: Cooling Rate-Cut Hopes Trigger Range-Bound Weakness Fundamentals: Lunar New Year holidays triggered a sharp collapse in downstream procurement, while smelters ramped up ingot casting, pushing social inventories even higher. Post-holiday SMM social inventories climbed to 1.108 million tonnes, with bloated stock levels failing to provide upward price support. Macroeconomics: Dimming Fed rate-cut bets lifted the US Dollar Index, prompting profit-taking liquidation that dragged aluminum prices lower and locked the market into weak consolidation. The average SMM A00 aluminum price retreated to RMB 23,385/tonne in February, down roughly RMB 700 month-on-month. March: Alternating Middle East Supply Risks & Demand Drags Intensify Volatility March trading centered on alternating forces of Middle East supply disruptions and demand-side headwinds, amplifying long-short volatility and driving aluminum prices through a pattern of rally-correction-rebound. Supply-side developments saw widespread overseas production curtailments: Mozal entered maintenance; Qatalum maintained a 60% operating rate and ruled out further output reductions; Alba shut down Lines 1, 2 and 3 with additional cutbacks rumoured; major damage to EGA facilities stoked fears of large-scale production suspensions. SMM estimates tally nearly 4 million tonnes of overseas primary aluminum capacity subject to cuts, including Mozambique’s smelter. Worries over contracting overseas supply became the core catalyst for periodic price rallies. Geopolitical risks: Escalating conflict in the Middle East raised widespread market concerns over shipping security in the Strait of Hormuz, embedding persistent geopolitical risk premiums into aluminum valuations. Demand-side headwinds: Mounting stagflation fears lifted risk aversion; lofty aluminum prices deterred downstream buying, while surging energy and freight costs crushed processor profitability and restrained demand recovery. SMM’s average A00 aluminum price rebounded to RMB 24,386/tonne in March, the second-highest monthly average in H1, alongside markedly wider price swings. 1.2 Q2: Expanding Supply & Marginal Demand Weakness Push Price Center Lower In Q2, high aluminum prices lifted domestic capacity utilization, while the market gradually priced in the impacts of overseas smelter cutbacks, shifting focus back to domestic fundamentals. Shanghai aluminum’s average price fell from roughly RMB 24,665/tonne in April to RMB 23,769/tonne in June, with prices dipping to an intra-year low of RMB 22,665/tonne in late June. Supply side: Strong prices encouraged primary aluminum smelters to boost operating rates and lift domestic output. The market gradually absorbed the impact of cutbacks in Mozambique and the Middle East, weakening the Shanghai-LME aluminum price ratio. Between June and July, rumours circulated that curtailed Middle East capacity would resume production, coupled with sequential commissioning of new Indonesian smelters, amplifying expectations of rising overseas supply. Industry communications indicate domestic primary aluminum output rose approximately 3.5% year-on-year over the first five months. Demand side: Elevated aluminum prices weighed on domestic end-user consumption, yet a stronger LME premium relative to Shanghai aluminum boosted semi-finished aluminum exports, offsetting weak domestic primary aluminum offtake. General Administration of Customs data records cumulative exports of unwrought aluminum and semi-finished products at 2.685 million tonnes in Jan-May, up 10.4% YoY. April single-month exports hit 598,000 tonnes, a one-year-plus high, followed by May shipments of 632,000 tonnes, up 15.5% YoY. Robust export volumes effectively filled the gap left by muted domestic consumption. Inventory side: Q2 delivered a pronounced destocking cycle. Social inventories peaked at 1.465 million tonnes in early May before falling to 1.165 million tonnes by end-June, a total drawdown of around 300,000 tonnes with an accelerated destocking pace. Weekly inventory drawdowns once surged to 170,000 tonnes, a four-year high for single-week de-stocking volumes. 2. Fundamental Supply & Demand Analysis 2.1 Supply: High Smelting Margins Boost Operating Rates, New Capacity Ramp-Ups Keep H1 Supply Ample Persistently robust smelting profitability in H1 2026 significantly expanded production flexibility, acting as the core driver of loose supply conditions through the first half. On one hand, sustained aluminum price strength maintained healthy per-tonne margins, maximizing smelters’ production incentives. On the other hand, new projects commissioned from late 2025 through H1 2026 entered sequential ramp-up phases, delivering steady monthly output increments. Continuous volume growth from newly commissioned capacity further lifted domestic primary aluminum production. The combined effects drove steady gains in national primary aluminum output, resulting in abundant raw material supply across the market. 2.2 Demand: Muted Domestic Consumption, Exports Act as Key Support Domestic primary aluminum demand in H1 2026 displayed a clear divergence: soft domestic offtake offset by buoyant external demand. Persistently high aluminum prices suppressed downstream purchasing, yet semi-finished aluminum exports benefited from favourable cross-market price differentials and delivered standout performance. General Administration of Customs data shows China exported 1.435 million tonnes of aluminum semi-finished products in Jan-May 2026, up 13.7% YoY, with May single-month exports reaching 320,000 tonnes (+14.7% YoY). Elevated export volumes over the first five months created a vital outlet for domestic primary aluminum digestions. The core driver behind export strength was the LME-over-Shanghai price spread: overseas markets faced tight supply expectations stemming from Middle East production cuts, while bloated domestic inventories depressed Shanghai aluminum, creating lucrative profit windows for semi-finished aluminum exporters. 2.3 Inventories: H1 Inventory Build to Multi-Year Highs Followed by Rapid Q2 Destocking Domestic social primary aluminum inventories traversed three distinct phases in H1 2026: rapid accumulation, consolidation at elevated levels, then steep destocking. Early-year seasonal weakness ahead of the Lunar New Year combined with high aluminum prices curbing demand drove continuous inventory builds, which peaked at a multi-year high of 1.465 million tonnes in early May. Subsequent downstream post-holiday restocking and surging export shipments triggered accelerated inventory drawdowns through Q2. The sharp destocking rate stemmed from concentrated export deliveries paired with a wave of downstream replenishment demand. 3. H2 2026 Outlook 3.1 Macroeconomics: Strong US Dollar Caps Metal Valuations The US will maintain its strong-dollar policy stance, keeping the US Dollar Index elevated and capping valuation upside across non-ferrous metals. Middle Eastern geopolitical risk premiums will gradually fade amid improved shipping outlook for the Strait of Hormuz and easing overseas liquidity jitters, creating long-term bearish pressure on aluminum prices. 3.2 Supply: Overseas Capacity Resumptions & New Commissioning Run Parallel Overseas market developments include incremental production restarts across Middle Eastern smelters, alongside faster ramp-up schedules for newly commissioned overseas capacity. 3.3 Demand: Weakening Support from Export Orders Short-term backlogged orders will continue to underpin semi-finished aluminum export volumes, yet narrowing cross-market price spreads have softened market expectations for new export order intake, pointing to downside risks for export growth over the medium-to-long term. Market participants will closely monitor domestic seasonal peak consumption trends and overseas new order placement momentum. 4. Comprehensive Market Assessment All factors considered, the Shanghai aluminum market will face dual headwinds of macro valuation pressure and expanding supply volumes throughout H2 2026.