[Industrial Silicon Prices Fluctuated; Polysilicon Price Sentiment Was Weak]: This week, the silicon metal market fluctuated significantly on news, falling first and then rising. As of March 5, SMM east China oxygen-blown #553 silicon was at 9,000-9,100 yuan/mt, with the transaction center moving down WoW; some suppliers quoted at 9,200 yuan/mt. The futures market fell first and then rose, with large fluctuations; amid disruptions from news such as expectations for Xinjiang electricity prices and environmental protection, futures prices recovered from the bottom. As futures prices rose, trading firms engaging in both spot and futures market raised their quotes accordingly; silicon enterprises held quotes steady or increased them by 100 yuan/mt. Low-priced supply in the market shifted from spot-futures to silicon enterprises, and downstream users purchased as needed, selecting lower-priced offers.

Capacity side, according to incomplete statistics, the domestic alkaline electrolyzer market remained at 43.77 GW and the PEM electrolyzer market remained at 2.7 GW, with no new capacity added. The 16 green electricity smart hydrogen production systems built by Shuangliang Group for ACME Group’s Oman green ammonia project with a daily output of 300 mt officially commenced shipment. Updates on electrolyzer projects: Xinjiang Hynda Energy Technology Co., Ltd.: The EPC tender was released for an integrated production line project with an annual production of 120,000 mt of green hydrogen and 700,000 mt of green ammonia. It is understood that this project is the largest green ammonia producer in China in terms of both scale and production, with a total investment of 10 billion yuan. At present, company registration, project filing, and equipment selection have been completed. The preliminary site is in Wusu West Industrial Park, covering about 600-800 mu; the next step will be to accelerate project planning and design, EIA, energy assessment, safety assessment, and other pre-project procedures, striving to commence production and achieve results as early as possible. Sinopec Sales Co., Ltd. Xinjiang Jiangbei Petroleum Branch: The first public notice for the EIA information disclosure of the new construction project of the Kunlun Road integrated energy supply station in Karamay District was released. Construction location: opposite the bus company on Kunlun Road, Karamay District. Construction content: the project covers an area of 7,504.01 m², with a newly built station building of 390 m² and a canopy of 450 m²; it will include 4 oil storage tanks, 2 fuel dispensers, 1 set of LNG skid-mounted equipment, 2 fast charging piles, 1 set of water electrolysis hydrogen production equipment, a set of hydrogen storage cylinders, and one set of hydrogen skid-mounted and refueling equipment. Annual sales: 3,500 mt of refined oil products, 800 mt of LNG, and 120 mt of hydrogen. China Coal Pingshuo Group Co., Ltd. : A change announcement was released for the procurement project of complete sets of alkaline electrolyzer equipment and ancillary facilities for Phase I of the 600,000 kW off-grid renewable energy hydrogen production project in the coal mining subsidence area of China Coal Pingshuo Group (green hydrogen coupled with the coal chemical segment), and the bid opening time was postponed to March 17, 2026. It is understood that the project adopts a main-and-auxiliary supply model, and the quotation includes 12×1,200 Nm³/h alkaline electrolyzers, 3×4,800 Nm³/h gas-liquid separation systems, 3×4,800 Nm³/h gas purification systems, etc. Junrui Green Hydrogen Energy (Shangdu County) Co., Ltd. : The 30,000 mt/year hydrogen production project in Lingyuan City completed filing. Total investment was 146,037 yuan; the project covers 375 mu, including an electrolysis workshop, 2 purification and compression workshops, a power station, a hydrogen tank farm, etc.; core equipment includes 84 sets of 1,000 Nm³/h electrolyzers, hydrogen storage tanks, as well as hydrogen purification units, compressors, etc. Inner Mongolia Green Hydrogen Steel Union Technology Co., Ltd.: The filing for the green electricity and green hydrogen steel mill plant construction project, a banner/county industrial project, was successfully completed. It was learned that the project’s main construction location is Guyang County, Baotou City; total investment: 1.02 billion yuan, funded by self-owned capital; planned construction period: from March 2026 to October 2027; construction content: construction of green electricity, green hydrogen, and green steel plant buildings and auxiliary facilities. Inner Mongolia Junhong Technology Co., Ltd.: Cancellation of the Green Methanol Plant Building Construction Project. It was learned that the Green Methanol Plant Building Construction Project of Inner Mongolia Junhong Technology Co., Ltd. is located in Baotou City—Guyang County—Jinshan Industrial Park. The project entity is Inner Mongolia Junhong Technology Co., Ltd., with a total investment of 1.5 billion yuan. Policy Review 1. Premier Li Qiang delivered the Government Work Report at the Fourth Session of the 14th National People’s Congress, emphasizing that efforts must be made to advance the development of a green, low-carbon economy. Specific measures include: improving relevant policies to promote green and low-carbon development; carrying out actions to improve quality, reduce costs, and cut carbon emissions in key industry; further advancing the development of zero-carbon industrial parks and factories; establishing a national low-carbon transition fund and actively fostering emerging growth drivers such as hydrogen energy and green fuels; implementing strong and effective controls over high energy-consuming and high-emission projects, accelerating the phase-out of outdated capacity, while supporting innovation and application of green and low-carbon technology and equipment; improving the mechanism for total resource volume management and the comprehensive conservation system, and strengthening the recycling and utilization of renewable resources. 2. The European Commission stated that it will maintain the fertilizer carbon tariff mechanism, while simultaneously implementing temporary tariff reductions and exemptions for fertilizers such as ammonia and urea, in order to balance environmental protection goals with agricultural cost pressure, ensure fair competition, and stabilize clean energy investment. 3. The European Commission approved a 4 billion euro dedicated fund for electrolyzers, providing a 30% equipment cost subsidy for projects with capacity ≥500MW/year, and setting the 2030 electrolyzer efficiency target for green hydrogen projects at ≥60% (LHV basis). Enterprise Updates Shandong Port Qingdao Port (Group) Co., Ltd. : At the Qianwan Port Area of Shandong Port Qingdao Port, the methanol bunkering vessel “Jianhang Lida” successfully carried out 2,500 mt of green methanol ship-to-ship bunkering operations for two international seagoing vessels. SPIC Green Energy Co., Ltd.: Tender Announcement for the 10th Batch of Centralized Tenders in 2026 (infrastructure projects). This includes multiple tenders related to the Lishu wind and solar power hydrogen-ammonia-methanol project: the foundation pile detection service project for the Lishu wind and solar power green hydrogen biomass-coupled green methanol project; the non-destructive detection service project for the Lishu wind and solar power green hydrogen biomass-coupled green methanol project; and the EPC project for the design and construction of the fine interior fit-out of the office building and canteen in the plant-front area of the chemical section of the Lishu wind and solar power green hydrogen biomass-coupled green methanol project. Hangzhou Fenghua Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd. : The major project approved by the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Marine Economic Development, jointly applied for with Windey, Baimahu Laboratory, Zhejiang University of Technology, and others—R&D and application demonstration of key equipment for an offshore wind power direct-coupled hydrogen production off-grid system—was approved. Tangshan Haitai New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. : Held a symposium with Beijing Energy International Holding Co., Ltd. The two sides focused on areas such as the construction of green electricity transmission corridors into Beijing and green hydrogen pipeline transportation, and conducted discussions and exchanges on deepening cooperation. China Huadian Corporation Ltd. : Party Secretary and Chairman Jiang Yi held talks in Baotou with Chen Zhichang, Member of the Standing Committee of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Party Committee and Party Secretary of the Baotou Municipal Party Committee, and Meng Qingwei, Deputy Party Secretary and Mayor. The two sides exchanged views on further deepening cooperation between central enterprises and local governments. CIMC Enric Holdings Limited​​​​​​​: Formally signed the Strategic Cooperation Framework Agreement in Jakarta with PT SAMATOR Group, an Indonesian provider of industrial gases and energy solutions. Based on their deep accumulation in energy equipment, industrial gases, and clean energy, the two sides reached a consensus on long-term strategic cooperation. Zhizi Automobile Technology Co., Ltd.​​​​​​​: Completed a Series B financing of several hundred million yuan, with investors including Shengshi Juxin, Guoxin Venture Capital, Hebei Industrial Investment, Green Era, Youda Shangrong, the Private Economy Fund, Huoshui Capital, and Huitou Zhizao. The funds will mainly be used for R&D of core technologies such as intelligent driving and autonomous driving, replenishment of working capital, and global market expansion. Patent Applications 1. Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) published patent CN2025110028, developing a ceramic-based anion exchange membrane with a laboratory-tested service life of 80,000 hours. 2. Johnson Matthey (UK) filed patent WO2025109876, disclosing a Fe-Ni-Mo ternary non-precious metal catalyst formulation with activity close to platinum-based materials. Technology Footprint/Technical Specifications 1. Xi’an Jiaotong University and a Peking University team jointly developed a new-type osmium-based catalyst, significantly improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of AEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production, supporting the large-scale deployment of low-cost green hydrogen. 2. Johnson Matthey and Syensqo achieved efficient recycling and reuse of platinum-group metals and ionomers from PEM fuel cells and electrolyzers, significantly reducing the carbon footprint. 3. Relevant research teams from the School of Electrical Engineering of Xi’an Jiaotong University and the National Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment Materials successfully developed a Ru/Ti3C2Ox@NF seawater electrolysis bifunctional electrocatalyst. 4.《Technical Specification for Wind and Solar Power + ESS Coupled Green Electricity Electrolysis Hydrogen Production (No. T/CIEP 0272—2025), a group standard, was issued and implemented by the China Industrial Environmental Protection Promotion Association. Zhongneng Dayou Energy Technology Co., Ltd. successfully conducted R&D of a 100 kW-class PEM electrolyzer hydrogen production multi-field coupling test device. 5. GKN Powder Metallurgy announced that it had developed a new-generation high performance, high-porosity, high-purity porous transport layer (HP-PTL) for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis.

In January 2026, the European Union and India reached a historic Free Trade Agreement (FTA), with the elimination of steel tariffs of up to 22% becoming a major market focus. However, clearing the policy fog of "bilateral exemptions" and analyzing actual export and carbon emission data reveals that the steel industry faces a highly asymmetric trade reshaping. This seemingly fair reduction is actually Europe trading a "capped" ticket for India's "uncapped" massive incremental market.

[SMM Stainless Steel Daily Review] SS Futures Fluctuate Rangebound; Bullish Sentiment for Spot Stainless Steel Set Back SMM News on March 4: SS futures showed a fluctuate upward trend, overall fluctuating rangebound with limited upside momentum, and closed at 14,205 yuan/mt before noon. In the spot market, affected by factors including weakening momentum for further upside in SS futures, unchanged guidance prices from major mainstream stainless steel mills yesterday, a sharp increase in expected stainless steel production schedules within the month, and the buildup of social inventory, bullish sentiment was set back and quotes loosened. The most-traded SS futures contract fluctuated downward. At 10:30 a.m., SS2604 was quoted at 14,245 yuan/mt, up 80 yuan/mt from the previous trading day. Spot premiums for 304/2B in Wuxi were in the 275-475 yuan/mt range. In the spot market, Wuxi cold-rolled 201/2B coils were generally stable; for cold-rolled trimmed-edge 304/2B coils, the average price in Wuxi was stable while the average price in Foshan fell by 50 yuan/mt; cold-rolled 316L/2B coils in Wuxi were stable; for hot-rolled 316L/NO.1 coils, Wuxi quotes rose by 100 yuan/mt; cold-rolled 430/2B coils in both Wuxi and Foshan were stable. The stainless steel market is gradually recovering, and SS futures strengthened and moved higher. Driven by warming expectations for the traditional peak consumption season of “Golden March and Silver April” and the continued fermentation of news on Indonesian nickel ore, market participants’ bullish sentiment was strong. However, the recovery pace on the spot side was slow. Some traders and downstream end-users have not yet resumed operations, market trading activity has not fully recovered, and only a small number of rigid-demand orders were concluded during the week, presenting a clear pattern of “strong futures, weak spot.” On the inventory side, ...

February 2026 coincided with the Chinese New Year holiday. Affected by holiday factors, production pace across core segments of China’s sodium-ion battery industry generally slowed, showing an “off-season reset” trend. From cathodes, anodes, and electrolyte to battery cells and end-users, production across all segments declined MoM to varying degrees, while YoY still maintained a certain degree of growth resilience.

Over the past few days, the Indonesian nickel market has reacted to the government’s announcement of a restricted 2026 RKAB production quota, set at approximately 260–270 million tons. This reduction has sent shockwaves through the industry, sparking widespread concern among both operational and upcoming smelters. Stakeholders are increasingly worried that these tightened supply levels will be insufficient to sustain their long-term production requirements. For the first one, The Indonesian Nickel Miners Association (APNI) has stated that the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) has agreed to consider revisions to the 2026 Work Plan and Budget (RKAB) starting in July. It is believed that the RKAB revisions could increase nickel production quotas by 25% to 30%. According to APNI, the domestic smelter demand based on the capacity is around 380-400 million tons, With the existing RKAB quota at 270 million tons and projected imports from the Philippines at 23 million tons, this 30% adjustment is critical to meeting the national ore deficit. This potential for more quota provides some relief to the market, but there is a second, more pressing issue to consider Another media also stated that The Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) has set a conservative nickel ore production target of 209.08 million tons for 2026, a figure notably lower than the approved RKAB quota of 260–270 million tons. According to Siti Sumilah Rita Susilawati of the Directorate General of Minerals and Coal, this strategic reduction is intended to preserve national reserves and stabilize global commodity prices As a result, the sudden perception of even deeper quota cuts has fueled confusion across the Indonesian market, which might further intensifying the pressure from already spiking nickel ore prices. I. Indonesia’s Calculated Nickel Ore Demand in 2026 According to SMM’s latest calculations, the total nickel ore requirement for 2026, which includes the demand from NPI, FeNi, Nickel Matte, and MHP, is estimated at approximately 334 million tons, based on the production estimates of smelter's current condition. This sharp increase is primarily driven by the rapid expansion of MHP production, which utilizes higher volumes of limonite ore. This surge in consumption has intensified the pressure on smelters to secure significantly higher mining quotas. II. Current Update and Understanding The Quota Revision? According to current understanding from the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 17 of 2025, citing the 11 th Article Regarding the Amendment of Work Approved Quotas in ESDM, it is stated that: Article 11 (1) Holders of an IUP (Mining Business License) for the Exploration stage, holders of an IUPK (Special Mining Business License) for the Exploration stage, holders of an IUP for the Production Operation stage, holders of an IUPK for the Production Operation stage, or holders of an IUPK as a Continuation of Contract/Agreement Operations may submit one (1) application for an amendment to the Exploration stage RKAB or the Production Operation stage RKAB in each current year. (2) The application for the RKAB Amendment as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be submitted after the holders of the Exploration stage IUP, Exploration stage IUPK, Production Operation stage IUP, Production Operation stage IUPK, or IUPK as a Continuation of Contract/Agreement Operations have submitted periodic reports up to the second quarter or no later than July 31st of the current year. SMM observes that RKAB revisions and amendments are standard procedure, as seen in both 2024 and 2025. This year, however, the submission window for revisions is expected to open after June, with a final deadline of July 31st. While the ESDM has not clarified whether the 260–270 million ton target already accounts for these mid-year adjustments, it remains highly likely that these revisions will be sufficient to meet domestic smelter demand. Another Potential Cuts? According to SMM’s further communication with ESDM, the predicted quota for 2026 still remains on 260-270 million tons estimate. Since the further production cuts rumor by ESDM is not in an official setting announcement, it is hereby confirmed that the quota approved of 2026 will not be lower than ESDM’s initial estimate of 260-270 million tons. From SMM's understanding, the target number to be lower than the quota is merely just an estimate of the production target, not necessarily reflecting the actual production numbers. III. Nickel Ore Supply and Demand Given the government’s push to tighten annual quotas, SMM expects this year’s revisions to land at approximately 20%, a more conservative number. Furthermore, nickel ore imports from the Philippines are unlikely to see significant growth compared to 2025, with estimates holding at approximately 19 million tons. This stagnant growth is due to the heavy concentration of Philippine exports to China, coupled with limited domestic mining capacity and a lack of new mining companies . After factoring in import volumes from the Philippines, the nickel ore market is likely to remain in a tight supply-demand balance, especially with potential hurdles like the rainy season slowing down mining operations. Nonetheless, this scenario is much more realistic than the alternative: a massive 50+ million ton deficit that would occur if the total quota were strictly capped at 270 million tons. IV. Conclusion Overall, the signal for significant quota cuts at the start of the year has already triggered a sharp rally in nickel ore prices, which could be seen from the substantial rise in premiums, largely driven by quota reductions at major mining companies and persistent uncertainty among small-to-mid-scale operators. Looking ahead, if the government maintains these restricted levels and fails to approve adequate supplemental quotas, domestic ore prices are poised for further upward momentum, potentially intensifying the cost burden on the downstream smelting sector.

February 2026 proved to be a pivotal month of challenge and adjustment for the global stainless steel market. Driven by the compounding pressures of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), intensifying geopolitical trade friction, significantly tightened raw material quotas, and sudden supply chain disruptions, the market navigated a complex landscape.

When Trump announced the launch of a $12 billion "Gold Reserve Plan" at the White House to procure and stockpile critical minerals such as rare earths, gallium, and cobalt for manufacturers, the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CNIA) was also studying the inclusion of copper concentrates in the national reserves. The global strategic resource reserve system is undergoing rapid restructuring, and a resource security battle centered on critical minerals has quietly begun. In early February 2026, the world's two largest economies almost simultaneously announced strategic reserve plans for critical minerals. The Trump administration officially launched a $12 billion critical mineral reserve project named the "Gold Reserve Plan." This plan aims to establish a 60-day emergency mineral reserve, utilizing $10 billion in loans from the US Export-Import Bank and approximately $2 billion in private capital to procure and stockpile critical mineral resources such as rare earths, gallium, and cobalt. From the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act setting clear recycling rate targets to the US’s tax incentive policies, a global policy network covering legislation, subsidies, and standards is taking shape. For China, the recycling industry of rare and precious metals is not only a vital component of resource security but also a key link in achieving the "dual carbon" goals and ensuring supply chain autonomy and control.

The global strategic resource reserve system is undergoing rapid restructuring, and a resource security battle centered on critical minerals has quietly begun.

In times of peace, oil and gas are cost variables; in a war context, traditional energy becomes a security variable. The escalation of conflict in the Middle East at the end of February led to a high opening for oil prices on the first trading day of March. During peacetime, energy prices fluctuate around the supply-demand gap, with the market focusing on production, inventory, and cost curves. However, in a war environment, the market first trades not on production but on deliverability. Whether key shipping routes are open, whether insurance costs soar, and whether sanctions spread, all quickly translate into risk premiums. As a result, oil prices exhibit high fluctuations, even if actual supply has not significantly decreased, as prices are pushed up by delivery uncertainties. Energy thus transforms from a commodity into a strategic resource. As an analyst in the new energy sector, I believe that this change does not simply benefit new energy. Rising oil prices reinforce the logic of electrification, making EVs and renewable energy more economically attractive. However, the macroeconomic uncertainty brought about by war may also dampen consumer and investment confidence. If high oil prices drive inflation and slow growth, overall demand for cars and industry will slow down, and new energy will not be immune. Therefore, the investment logic for new energy is no longer unidirectional, but depends on the balance between substitution effects and macroeconomic contraction effects. A deeper change lies in the fact that capital is beginning to re-evaluate energy security. The traditional oil and gas system is highly dependent on cross-border transportation and continuous fuel supply, with its vulnerabilities lying in shipping and geopolitics. In contrast, wind and PV do not require continuous fuel input during operation, and energy storage can enhance the stability of the power system, giving new energy strategic value in a war environment. They are not only low-carbon tools but also a path to reducing external dependence. The security attributes of new energy are thus being revalued. However, it must be recognized that this security attribute is not absolute. The manufacturing of new energy is highly dependent on critical minerals such as lithium, nickel, and cobalt, with their mining and processing concentrated and heavily reliant on transportation. If upstream resource policies tighten or logistics are disrupted, risks will also propagate through the industry chain. Therefore, the security of new energy is operational security, not supply security. This means that future investment logic will shift from simply pursuing the lowest cost to focusing on supply chain control capabilities and regional diversification. In a war environment, the allocation of risk premiums by capital changes. Transportation premiums, geopolitical premiums, and supply chain concentration premiums all rise. The volatility of traditional energy intensifies; new energy generation assets gain a security bonus; and critical minerals and midstream processing capabilities become new strategic nodes. Efficiency is no longer the sole criterion, with redundancy and controllability becoming important components of the valuation system. Deglobalization and supply chain restructuring may push up the cost center of the industry, but they also enhance the strategic position of assets. In this context, the value of energy storage and power grid assets stands out. If conflicts persist, the core goal of the energy system will shift from cost optimization to system resilience. Distributed energy, microgrids, and energy storage have insurance-like attributes, and their value becomes more evident in extreme scenarios. Even if high raw material prices increase project costs, an elevated policy priority may still provide long-term support. Over the past five to ten years, the narrative of the energy transition has largely focused on new energy as a tool for decarbonization to ensure sustainable development of the planet. However, geopolitical tensions in the last two to three years have redefined new energy as part of the energy security framework. Within new energy, it is not just the power generation assets that are being repriced, but also energy storage and the power grid. 1) In a war environment, the core issue of the energy system shifts from efficiency to resilience During peacetime, the goal of the energy system is to maximize efficiency: lowest cost, highest utilization rate, and optimal allocation. Cross-border trade and centralized power generation have made the global energy structure highly globalized and scaled. War exposes the vulnerabilities of such a system. Maritime transport routes, natural gas pipelines, tanker insurance, key ports, and large power plants can all become risk nodes. At this point, the system's priority is no longer efficiency but resilience – the ability to maintain basic operational capacity under shocks. Energy storage and the power grid are at the core of a resilient system. 2) Energy storage: from an arbitrage tool to system insurance In normal circumstances, the value of energy storage mainly comes from electricity arbitrage, ancillary services, and peak load regulation, with its return on investment depending on fluctuations in electricity prices and policy subsidies. However, in a wartime context, the value of energy storage is redefined. It is no longer merely an economic optimization tool but a guarantee of power system stability. Energy storage can provide emergency support during fuel supply disruptions or grid shocks, preventing the power system from collapsing due to a single point of failure. This means that energy storage assets have insurance-like attributes. When system risks rise, capital's risk appetite for these assets increases. Even if high raw material prices drive up project costs, there may still be stronger policy support because of the rising strategic value. The valuation logic of energy storage thus transitions from "IRR-driven" to "system safety premium." 3) Power grid: an undervalued strategic hub The impact of war on the energy system often first manifests in the transmission and distribution network. Centralized energy structures rely on a few key periods, and once damaged, the impact is widespread. Therefore, power grid upgrades and digitalization have become the focus of secure investments. Enhancements in smart grids, regional interconnections, grid redundancy, and distributed access capabilities can significantly strengthen the system's resilience to shocks. The investment logic for power grid assets becomes clearer in a wartime context: it is not only infrastructure but also the backbone of national energy security. In the long term, power grid upgrades will be a necessary prerequisite for the expansion of new energy. The fluctuations in new energy generation require more robust transmission, distribution, and dispatching capabilities. When risk environments rise, countries are more inclined to accelerate grid construction to reduce dependence on external energy. 4) Distributed Energy and Microgrids: The Strategic Significance of Decentralization While centralized energy systems are efficient, they are also highly vulnerable. Although distributed PV, community energy storage, and microgrids are relatively small in scale, they possess the capability for independent operation. In a war context, distributed energy has two advantages: first, it reduces the risk of single-point failures; second, it decreases reliance on cross-border fuel transportation. The strategic value of such assets is being re-evaluated in high-risk environments. 5) Deep Changes in Investment Logic The rising value of energy storage and power grids means that new energy investments no longer solely revolve around installation growth and cost reduction, but rather around system security and supply chain control. Key changes include: a. Capital is more focused on localized manufacturing and supply chain diversification; b. The weight of security in investment decisions has increased; c. The cost center may shift upward in stages, but the strategic premium has risen. The valuation system of the new energy industry is transitioning from a growth premium to a strategic premium. What opportunities and risks does geopolitics bring to China's new energy industry? 1) China's Energy Security Structure: From Import Dependence to Electrification Advantage China has long been one of the world's largest crude oil importers, with persistent energy security issues. In a wartime environment, oil price fluctuations and transportation risks increase, directly affecting energy costs and macro expectations. However, unlike before, China has established the most complete new energy manufacturing system globally. The high integration of the PV, wind, energy storage, battery, and EV industry chains gives China a manufacturing and scale advantage during the energy transition. In a war context, this advantage is beginning to translate into security attributes: an increase in electrification means a reduction in dependence on external fuels; an increase in new energy installations means a more resilient energy structure. Thus, China's new energy system has the potential for alternative security. 2) Energy Storage and Power Grid: China's Most Strategic Assets If the war becomes protracted, the core of the energy system will no longer be power generation capacity itself, but system stability. China's layout in energy storage and power grid gives it a relative advantage at this stage. In terms of energy storage, China possesses the world's largest battery manufacturing capacity and cost advantages. Under the logic of energy security, energy storage is no longer solely about economics, but has become an important tool for ensuring the stability and emergency response capability of the power system. At the policy level, there may be an emphasis on increasing the proportion of energy storage in the power system. Regarding the power grid, China has developed the world's largest ultra-high voltage transmission network and grid construction capabilities. The increased redundancy and interconnectivity of the grid help to absorb more new energy installations while enhancing the system's resilience against shocks. In a high-risk environment, investment in the grid may accelerate. This means that, under the security logic, China's energy storage and power grid assets have structural strategic premiums. 3) Critical Minerals and Supply Chain: Advantages and Risks Coexist China has advantages in the new energy manufacturing sector, but still relies on overseas layouts for upstream resources. The supply chains for critical minerals such as lithium, nickel, and cobalt are highly internationalized, and wars or geopolitical risks may amplify policy and logistics uncertainties. For China's new energy industry chain, the real challenge lies not in the manufacturing end, but in the stability and cost fluctuations of the resource end. The trend of supply chain deglobalization may push up the cost center, compressing profit margins. The core of future competition will shift from scale expansion to resource control capabilities and the diversification of global layouts. 4) New Energy Vehicles: China's Structural Advantages and Short-term Fluctuations The impact of the war environment on new energy vehicles also has a dual nature. On one hand, rising oil prices reinforce the economic advantages of EVs. In a context of high oil prices, the cost advantages of using EVs become even more evident, which is conducive to increasing the penetration rate among end-users. China has the world's largest EV capacity and supply chain system, with scale and cost advantages. On the other hand, high oil prices may suppress consumer confidence through inflation and macroeconomic uncertainty. If the war continues for a long time, global economic growth may slow down, putting overall car demand under pressure. Although new energy vehicles have a substitution logic, they cannot be completely independent of the macro cycle. Therefore, the short-term performance of China's new energy vehicle industry will depend on the relative strength of the substitution effect and macroeconomic drag. 5) Long-term Structure: Re-stratification of Strategic Assets In the era of energy security, the competitiveness of China's new energy system will be more reflected in three aspects: First, manufacturing scale and cost control capabilities; Second, the system support capacity of the power grid and energy storage; Third, the diversification of upstream resources and supply chain layout. War has accelerated the stratification of the global energy system. Traditional energy bears higher fluctuation risks; new energy power generation and power grid assets gain a safety premium; critical minerals become the focal point of geopolitical competition. For China, the new energy industry is no longer just an engine for growth but also a part of the energy security system. The investment logic will shift from pure growth rate and subsidies to strategic position and supply chain stability. Overall, as energy transitions from a cost variable to a security variable, the strategic value of China's new energy system rises, but it also faces higher supply chain risks and global competitive pressures. Energy storage and the power grid are becoming the core of system stability; new energy vehicles benefit under the substitution logic, but one must be wary of macro cycles; critical minerals will determine the cost center and industrial profit margins. In an era where war reshapes the energy order, stability is more important than growth. SMM New Energy Analyst Yang Le 13916526348