Supply Side: Lower Year-on-Year Operating Rates, Extended Spring Festival Holiday Restricting Capacity Output.The overall supply of the zinc oxide industry in H1 2026 was characterized by "shrinking output and weak operating rates".

On July 13, the average warrant price rose $3/mt day-on-day to $86/mt (price range $80-92/mt); the average B/L price rose $3/mt day-on-day to $85/mt (price range $80-90/mt); the average EQ copper (CIF B/L) price rose $1/mt day-on-day to $54/mt (price range $50-58/mt), with quotations referencing cargoes arriving from July to mid-August. The SHFE/LME price ratio moved higher on the day, but limited by still scarce available cargoes in the market, actual transactions were thin. Domestic copper cathode social inventory continued to destock sharply, with premiums showing a further upward trend. The market heard that B/Ls registered in late July were quoted at $100/mt, while mainstream EQ quotations for late July to August were around $60/mt.

[Domestic Zinc Concentrate Market]This week, domestic zinc concentrate treatment charges (TCs) across multiple regions in China were gradually finalized, with July TCs continuing to decline from June levels. The primary driver behind the latest reduction was the persistently weak domestic-to-overseas price ratio, which pushed losses on imported zinc concentrate to nearly RMB 2,000/mt once again. As a result, Chinese smelters continued to prioritize purchases of domestic zinc concentrate in July, keeping the domestic concentrate market in a tight supply-demand balance.

According to SMM, the weekly combined operating rate of lead-acid battery enterprises across five provinces was 63.96% during July 3-9, 2026, down 0.14 percentage points WoW. Recently, China's e-bike and automotive battery markets remained in the traditional off-season, and in June, dealers had stockpiled extensively at low prices, leaving current battery inventory levels elevated. Since July, many lead-acid battery enterprises reported sluggish orders, and some began cutting production in early July, dragging down the operating rate this week. Meanwhile, as the lead SHFE/LME price ratio narrowed, the cost advantages of domestic auxiliary materials such as tin, antimony, and sulphuric acid improved. Some enterprises indicated that export orders improved relatively, and they modestly increased production, thus limiting the decline in the operating rate this week.

I. Key Points In H1 2026, nickel prices exhibited wide fluctuations characterized by a “rebound from lows—consolidation at highs—pullback and consolidation” pattern. The most-traded LME nickel contract surged from $14,000/mt at the beginning of the year to near $20,000 in May, before pulling back to $16,000-17,000 in July; the most-traded SHFE nickel contract climbed from 110,000 yuan/mt to above 150,000 yuan/mt, and then retreated to 125,000-130,000 yuan/mt. The driving logic of this market move was the intertwined resonance of three main themes: a shift in Indonesia’s resource policies, repeated fluctuations in global macro liquidity expectations, and the impact of geopolitical conflicts on raw material costs. The center of nickel prices did rise compared to 2025, but the “shadow of surplus” has not dissipated. In H2 2026, the key variables for tracking nickel prices are as follows: First, the approval results of Indonesia’s RKAB quota revision in July. A significant increase in the quota would substantially narrow the supply deficit and weigh on nickel prices. Second, the Fed’s policy path — whether the hawkish signal from the June dot plot will persist — which affects the US dollar index and the valuation center of commodities. Third, sulphur supply and the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, which determines the cost support strength along the MHP–nickel sulphate–refined nickel chain. Fourth, demand from stainless steel and NEV ternary power batteries. Fifth, the pace of global visible inventory destocking. Sustained destocking would serve as a real support signal, while high inventories would limit price elasticity. Under a neutral scenario, LME nickel prices are expected to trade in the range of $15,500-17,500/mt in H2. II. Macro Environment – Reversal of Liquidity Expectations, Substantial Impact of Geopolitical Costs, and the ‘Dual Strength’ Pattern of the RMB 1. Fed Policy Path: ‘From Dovish to Hawkish’ At the beginning of the year, the market widely expected 50-100 bp of rate cuts in H1 2026, and the US dollar index fell below 97 at one point, creating a relatively loose liquidity environment. However, mid-year, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s hawkish stance surprised the market. The June meeting kept rates unchanged and the dot plot signaled a bias toward rate hikes, leading to a systematic revision of the previously priced “dovish delivery” logic. This directly weighed on the valuation of industrial metals such as nickel, serving as a key macro trigger for the nickel price decline in June. 2. Geopolitical Conflicts Expanded from ‘Safe-Haven Trades’ to ‘Real Cost Shocks’ The Middle East situation (tensions among the US, Israel and Iran, and disturbances in the Strait of Hormuz) not only pushed up energy and safe-haven premiums, but also, through the critical link of sulphur supply, directly raised the production cost of Indonesia’s MHP (each mt of MHP in metal content consumes about 10 mt of sulphur), forming the core driver of the pulse-like surge in nickel prices in May. After a ceasefire agreement was reached between the US and Iran in mid-June, energy and safe-haven premiums receded, leading to a peak and subsequent pullback in commodities, confirming the dual impact of geopolitical variables on nickel prices. 3. China’s Macroeconomy and RMB ‘Dual Strength’ Provide a Unique Offset Against a generally stronger US dollar, the onshore RMB bucked the trend, appreciating from 6.98 to 6.79 (a gain of about 2.9%). The relative strength of the RMB, with the exchange rate declining (USD/CNY fell), caused import costs to drop sharply, opening the import window and generating arbitrage profits. However, as large volumes of imported nickel flowed into the domestic market, the spot supply of nickel plates in China increased, accelerating the pace of inventory buildup and weighing on domestic prices. At the same time, LME nickel inventories decreased, leading to a repair of the SHFE/LME nickel price ratio, and the import window closed again in May. III. Indonesia's Industrial Policy—Systemic Transformation from "Expanding Capacity" to "Controlling the Chain to Raise Prices" In H1 2026, Indonesia's nickel industry policy completed a strategic shift, systematically deploying a policy package centered on "controlling supply, stabilizing prices, and enhancing resource added value," which became the core fundamental variable driving wide fluctuations in nickel prices. 1. Significant tightening of total RKAB quotas and tilted allocation structure At the beginning of the year, Indonesia's ESDM announced that the 2026 nickel ore quota would be drastically cut from 379 million wmt in 2025 to 270 million wmt. The world's largest single nickel mine project, WBN, saw its 2026 quota suffer a "cliff-like" reduction; its quota was exhausted in May, leading to full-scale production cuts and shutdowns, stoking persistent concerns over tight supply in H1. The Indonesian authorities have clarified that July 1 to 31, 2026 will be the mid-year application period for supplementary RKAB quotas, prioritizing compliant miners with integrated domestic downstream smelting capacity (such as supporting NPI or HPAL projects). The mid-year policy game over RKAB quotas is intensifying. 2. HPM pricing formula reform shifts from single nickel pricing to multi-element comprehensive pricing The new formula effective April 15 incorporates associated elements such as iron, cobalt, and chromium into the value component for the first time. Indonesia sought to recapture the undervalued value of associated resources into the pricing system, raising benchmark prices for nickel ore and intermediate products across the cost side. However, this reform met strong opposition from the domestic smelting industry, which argued that it would further squeeze smelting profits amid already surging sulfur and energy costs. 3. Indonesian government officially releases new export control regulations for ferronickel (FeNi) and NPI In July, Indonesia further strengthened export supervision of high-value-added nickel products under Finance Minister Regulation (KMK) No.32/MK/BC/2026 (implementing Trade Minister Regulation No.17/2026). The new regulation targets products under HS Code Ex.7202.60.00, including ferronickel (FeNi) ingots and lumps with nickel content ≥8%, sponge ferronickel (Sponge FeNi) and granular ferronickel (Nugget FeNi) with nickel content ≥4%, as well as low-grade ferronickel products with 2% ≤ Ni <4% and iron content ≥75% (covering some NPI products). Export requires a surveyor's report (LS) and relevant export licenses; from January 1, 2027, export will generally only be allowed through state-owned export enterprises (BUMN Ekspor), with exemptions under specific circumstances. Overall, Indonesia is currently tightening quotas, raising taxes and fees, and imposing export controls to elevate resource value, seeking to keep nickel prices within its officially recognized desired range ($19,000-20,000/mt) over the long term. On the other hand, it must balance stability of the industry chain and foreign investor confidence in actual implementation, thus exhibiting a game-like characteristic of "tight first then loose, adjusting while implementing."The extreme policy uncertainty was one of the core reasons behind the wide fluctuations in nickel prices in H1. IV. Changes in Nickel Intermediate Product Raw Materials: Restructuring of the Cost Transmission Chain 1. MHP and High-Grade Nickel Matte: A Dynamic Game Dominated by "Auxiliary Material Costs" There are three main production routes for nickel sulphate raw materials: MHP (hydrometallurgy): the dominant route with the largest long-term growth, but highly dependent on sulphur; high-grade nickel matte (pyrometallurgy RKEF conversion / oxygen-enriched side-blowing route): an alternative route with low dependence on sulphur and relatively stable cost elasticity; nickel briquette dissolution: the least economical, feasible only within specific price spread windows. The sharp fluctuations in sulphur prices in H1 reshaped the cost structure of the entire nickel industry chain. Producing one mt in metal content of MHP requires approximately 10 mt of sulphur, while tensions in the Strait of Hormuz disrupted Indonesia’s sulphur import channels, forcing Huayou Cobalt’s Huafei Nickel-Cobalt to cut production on some lines starting in May. Sulphur prices surged, with the SMM sulphur CIF Indonesia price peaking at $1,300/mt, and the cost shock was transmitted step by step along the “sulphur—MHP—nickel sulphate—electrodeposited nickel” chain, becoming one of the core drivers behind the rapid nickel price rise in May. The high-grade nickel matte route, relying on pyrometallurgy, is far less dependent on sulphur than MHP. Consequently, during the sulphur price spike, high-grade nickel matte’s cost advantage over MHP widened significantly, creating direct substitution pressure on MHP’s market share. In terms of production trends, Indonesia’s MHP production edged up about 0.02% YoY to 206,000 mt in metal content in January-June 2026. Over the same period, high-grade nickel matte posted the most impressive growth, with production up about 123% YoY to 185,000 mt in metal content, strengthening its position in the competition for nickel sulphate raw materials. In the medium and long term, however, once sulphur supply normalizes and MHP costs pull back, the MHP route, with its scale effects and relatively mature cost curve, will reclaim its dominant share of the nickel sulphate raw material market; after all, MHP projects’ capacity base is far larger than that of high-grade nickel matte, and its cobalt by-product also provides a substantial marginal revenue contribution (about $4,500/mt Ni). 2. Production Capacity Switching Game Between High-Grade Nickel Matte and NPI High-grade nickel matte and NPI share the same RKEF production lines and laterite nickel ore resources, differing only in whether a sulphidation conversion stage is added at the end. The conversion decision is essentially a profit-maximization problem: when the marginal revenue of high-grade nickel matte relative to NPI covers the additional equipment and process losses of sulphidation conversion, lines switch to high-grade nickel matte; otherwise, they tend toward NPI. The conversion profit chart shows that profit for NPI-to-high-grade-nickel-matte conversion appeared only in April-May. After MHP production cuts in May, the monthly nickel sulphate raw material deficit was about 8,000 mt Ni, theoretically requiring increased high-grade nickel matte production to fill. However, due to RKAB quota constraints and the continued decline in NPI feed grade, integrated enterprises prioritized supplying stainless steel, making it difficult for high-grade nickel matte to offset the MHP raw material shortfall. This was a key reason why nickel sulphate prices remained firm even after refined nickel prices fell sharply in May. 5. Refined Nickel Supply-Demand Pattern: High Inventory vs. Structural Tightness Expectations 1. Supply Side: Electrodeposited Nickel Capacity Continues to Expand, Production Hits Repeated Records The most certain trend on the supply side is the sustained release of electrodeposited nickel capacity and production in China and Indonesia. According to SMM data, from January to June 2026, China’s refined nickel production was 215,000 mt, a YoY growth rate of 9%; Indonesia’s refined nickel production was 56,000 mt, a YoY growth rate of 97%. Meanwhile, at the beginning of 2026, China’s refined nickel trade pattern underwent a temporary reversal. Previously, benefiting from the explosion in electrodeposited nickel capacity, China had once been expanding its net exports of refined nickel. However, entering Q1 2026, as the price spread between Chinese and overseas markets opened up and the import arbitrage window was activated, China turned back into a net importer of refined nickel, with net imports exceeding 80,000 mt in January-April. 2. Demand Side: New Energy Recovery, Stainless Steel Support, and Steady Alloy & Special Steel In H1 2026, stainless steel, the largest downstream application of nickel, maintained mild growth. Total stainless steel production in China and Indonesia from January to June was approximately 23 million mt, up about 2% YoY. Steel mills maintained relatively high operating rates throughout H1, with stable apparent consumption. In the new energy (ternary battery) sector, nickel demand saw a strong recovery. From January to June, China’s ternary cathode precursor production was 528,000 mt, up 32% YoY; ternary cathode material production was 493,000 mt, up 40% YoY. Alloy & special steel and electroplating, although accounting for a relatively low share of total primary nickel consumption, played a critical role in refined nickel demand in H1 due to their irreplaceability. From January to June, China’s total refined nickel demand was approximately 140,000 mt, up 9% YoY. Military and aerospace demand strengthened, while high-end manufacturing demand remained steady with moderate growth. 3. Inventory Side: Global Visible Inventory Remains at Historical Highs Despite wild swings in nickel prices in H1, global visible nickel inventory remained at relatively high historical levels. LME nickel inventory fluctuated in the range of 270,000-280,000 mt for an extended period. China’s social inventory and exchange warrants experienced significant buildup. As of July, SMM refined nickel social inventory reached 130,000 mt, with total global inventory hitting a high of 497,000 mt. High visible inventory posed a significant constraint on nickel price rises. In June, after digesting supply disruption narratives, the market refocused on the fundamental reality of “high inventory and lackluster demand,” and nickel prices pulled back from a temporary high to around $16,100/mt. 6. H2 2026 Risk Alerts and Nickel Price Forecasts Based on the logic of H1, nickel price trends in H2 are expected to maintain a fundamental pattern dominated by policy gaming, with macro factors amplifying volatility. The following variables merit close monitoring: 1. The final outcome of the RKAB quota revision approval in Indonesia in July; 2. whether the US Fed's policy path in H2 will continue its hawkish stance; 3. whether sulfur supply can substantially return to normal, and whether there is a risk of repeated disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz situation; 4. whether end-use demand from stainless steel and new energy sectors can show a substantial improvement; 5. the destocking pace of global visible inventory. Based on the above price influencing factors, a scenario analysis for nickel prices is conducted: Bearish scenario (quotas being more accommodative than expected): quota increase ≥30% + sulfur pullback + high inventory pressure → LME nickel $14,000—$16,000/mt. Neutral scenario (highest probability): quota slightly increased but still tight + sulfur consolidates at highs → LME nickel $15,500—$17,500/mt. Bullish scenario (tight quotas + secondary cost surge): quotas continue to tighten + export controls + repeated geopolitical tensions push up sulfur → LME nickel $17,000—$19,000/mt.

[Cost Squeeze and Overcapacity: 2026 Zinc Oxide H1 Review and Market Outlook] Overall H1 operating run showed a trend of “low-level pullback during Chinese New Year — phased recovery after the holiday — weakening again in the off-season”, with the industry average operating rate in H1 falling 0.11 percentage points YoY.

[SHFE/LME Price Ratio Drops to Around 6.8 and Consolidates]: This week, the SHFE/LME price ratio pulled back to around 6.8 and consolidated, and the zinc ingot export window opened intermittently. Outside China, expectations for US-Iran negotiations heated up, expectations for US Fed interest rate cuts improved, and, coupled with continued LME inventory destocking, LME zinc performed relatively strong.

On July 10, the average warrant price rose by $1/mt from the previous trading day, closing at $83/mt (quotation range $76-90/mt); the average B/L price was flat from the previous trading day, closing at $82/mt (quotation range $74-90/mt); the average price for EQ copper (CIF B/L) increased by $1/mt from the previous trading day, closing at $53/mt (quotation range $49-57/mt), with quotations referencing cargoes arriving between July and mid-August. The SHFE/LME price ratio pulled back today. Available supply in the market remained tight, and market quotations continued to stay firm. However, some suppliers indicated they were temporarily holding back shipments to observe trends, resulting in sparse spot market transactions during the day. It is heard that registered warrants for delivery from late July to early August were quoted at $90-95/mt today, while EQ copper quotations for July to August shipment showed a wide range, mainly quoted at $55-65/mt.

In H1 2026, Shanghai aluminum prices followed a high-first-then-low trajectory. In Q1, a mix of market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East drove aluminum prices to multi-year highs. Entering Q2, confirmation of the US strong-dollar policy stance, easing supply disruptions in the Middle East, and a seasonal lull in domestic downstream consumption combined to push the aluminum price center downward continuously. Looking ahead to H2, persistent strong US dollar sentiment and overseas liquidity concerns will cap non-ferrous metal valuations. On the supply side, elevated aluminum prices have incentivized higher production releases; domestic operating capacity is projected to rise month-on-month, while newly commissioned capacity in the Middle East and Indonesia will ramp up output gradually. On the demand side, domestic consumption recovery is set to remain modest. Existing export order backlogs will still prop up aluminum semi-finished product shipments, yet market expectations for new export orders have softened. All told, Shanghai aluminum’s price center is likely to slide further in H2, delivering a full-year high-first-then-low price pattern. 1. H1 2026 Shanghai Aluminum Price Review by Stage 1.1 Q1: Macroeconomics & Geopolitics Dominate, Aluminum Prices Surge Then Consolidate Shanghai aluminum prices in Q1 2026 were primarily dictated by macro sentiment and overseas supply disruptions, with seasonally weak fundamentals taking a backseat. January: Rate Cut Expectations & Capital Inflows Fuel Price Rally Fundamentals: A seasonal lull ahead of the Lunar New Year created demand weakness, leading to a continuous build-up of social aluminum ingot inventories. By late January, SMM-tracked social inventories hit 782,000 tonnes, the highest level for the period in three years. Sustained high aluminum margins squeezed profit margins for downstream processors, dampening their willingness to operate and curbing primary aluminum purchasing activity. Macroeconomics: Markets priced in an impending Fed rate-cut cycle, sending the US Dollar Index sharply lower and drawing heavy speculative capital into commodity futures. Complementary pro-consumption policies rolled out domestically further underpinned aluminum prices. SMM’s average A00 aluminum price stood at RMB 24,086/tonne in January, the highest monthly average in H1. February: Cooling Rate-Cut Hopes Trigger Range-Bound Weakness Fundamentals: Lunar New Year holidays triggered a sharp collapse in downstream procurement, while smelters ramped up ingot casting, pushing social inventories even higher. Post-holiday SMM social inventories climbed to 1.108 million tonnes, with bloated stock levels failing to provide upward price support. Macroeconomics: Dimming Fed rate-cut bets lifted the US Dollar Index, prompting profit-taking liquidation that dragged aluminum prices lower and locked the market into weak consolidation. The average SMM A00 aluminum price retreated to RMB 23,385/tonne in February, down roughly RMB 700 month-on-month. March: Alternating Middle East Supply Risks & Demand Drags Intensify Volatility March trading centered on alternating forces of Middle East supply disruptions and demand-side headwinds, amplifying long-short volatility and driving aluminum prices through a pattern of rally-correction-rebound. Supply-side developments saw widespread overseas production curtailments: Mozal entered maintenance; Qatalum maintained a 60% operating rate and ruled out further output reductions; Alba shut down Lines 1, 2 and 3 with additional cutbacks rumoured; major damage to EGA facilities stoked fears of large-scale production suspensions. SMM estimates tally nearly 4 million tonnes of overseas primary aluminum capacity subject to cuts, including Mozambique’s smelter. Worries over contracting overseas supply became the core catalyst for periodic price rallies. Geopolitical risks: Escalating conflict in the Middle East raised widespread market concerns over shipping security in the Strait of Hormuz, embedding persistent geopolitical risk premiums into aluminum valuations. Demand-side headwinds: Mounting stagflation fears lifted risk aversion; lofty aluminum prices deterred downstream buying, while surging energy and freight costs crushed processor profitability and restrained demand recovery. SMM’s average A00 aluminum price rebounded to RMB 24,386/tonne in March, the second-highest monthly average in H1, alongside markedly wider price swings. 1.2 Q2: Expanding Supply & Marginal Demand Weakness Push Price Center Lower In Q2, high aluminum prices lifted domestic capacity utilization, while the market gradually priced in the impacts of overseas smelter cutbacks, shifting focus back to domestic fundamentals. Shanghai aluminum’s average price fell from roughly RMB 24,665/tonne in April to RMB 23,769/tonne in June, with prices dipping to an intra-year low of RMB 22,665/tonne in late June. Supply side: Strong prices encouraged primary aluminum smelters to boost operating rates and lift domestic output. The market gradually absorbed the impact of cutbacks in Mozambique and the Middle East, weakening the Shanghai-LME aluminum price ratio. Between June and July, rumours circulated that curtailed Middle East capacity would resume production, coupled with sequential commissioning of new Indonesian smelters, amplifying expectations of rising overseas supply. Industry communications indicate domestic primary aluminum output rose approximately 3.5% year-on-year over the first five months. Demand side: Elevated aluminum prices weighed on domestic end-user consumption, yet a stronger LME premium relative to Shanghai aluminum boosted semi-finished aluminum exports, offsetting weak domestic primary aluminum offtake. General Administration of Customs data records cumulative exports of unwrought aluminum and semi-finished products at 2.685 million tonnes in Jan-May, up 10.4% YoY. April single-month exports hit 598,000 tonnes, a one-year-plus high, followed by May shipments of 632,000 tonnes, up 15.5% YoY. Robust export volumes effectively filled the gap left by muted domestic consumption. Inventory side: Q2 delivered a pronounced destocking cycle. Social inventories peaked at 1.465 million tonnes in early May before falling to 1.165 million tonnes by end-June, a total drawdown of around 300,000 tonnes with an accelerated destocking pace. Weekly inventory drawdowns once surged to 170,000 tonnes, a four-year high for single-week de-stocking volumes. 2. Fundamental Supply & Demand Analysis 2.1 Supply: High Smelting Margins Boost Operating Rates, New Capacity Ramp-Ups Keep H1 Supply Ample Persistently robust smelting profitability in H1 2026 significantly expanded production flexibility, acting as the core driver of loose supply conditions through the first half. On one hand, sustained aluminum price strength maintained healthy per-tonne margins, maximizing smelters’ production incentives. On the other hand, new projects commissioned from late 2025 through H1 2026 entered sequential ramp-up phases, delivering steady monthly output increments. Continuous volume growth from newly commissioned capacity further lifted domestic primary aluminum production. The combined effects drove steady gains in national primary aluminum output, resulting in abundant raw material supply across the market. 2.2 Demand: Muted Domestic Consumption, Exports Act as Key Support Domestic primary aluminum demand in H1 2026 displayed a clear divergence: soft domestic offtake offset by buoyant external demand. Persistently high aluminum prices suppressed downstream purchasing, yet semi-finished aluminum exports benefited from favourable cross-market price differentials and delivered standout performance. General Administration of Customs data shows China exported 1.435 million tonnes of aluminum semi-finished products in Jan-May 2026, up 13.7% YoY, with May single-month exports reaching 320,000 tonnes (+14.7% YoY). Elevated export volumes over the first five months created a vital outlet for domestic primary aluminum digestions. The core driver behind export strength was the LME-over-Shanghai price spread: overseas markets faced tight supply expectations stemming from Middle East production cuts, while bloated domestic inventories depressed Shanghai aluminum, creating lucrative profit windows for semi-finished aluminum exporters. 2.3 Inventories: H1 Inventory Build to Multi-Year Highs Followed by Rapid Q2 Destocking Domestic social primary aluminum inventories traversed three distinct phases in H1 2026: rapid accumulation, consolidation at elevated levels, then steep destocking. Early-year seasonal weakness ahead of the Lunar New Year combined with high aluminum prices curbing demand drove continuous inventory builds, which peaked at a multi-year high of 1.465 million tonnes in early May. Subsequent downstream post-holiday restocking and surging export shipments triggered accelerated inventory drawdowns through Q2. The sharp destocking rate stemmed from concentrated export deliveries paired with a wave of downstream replenishment demand. 3. H2 2026 Outlook 3.1 Macroeconomics: Strong US Dollar Caps Metal Valuations The US will maintain its strong-dollar policy stance, keeping the US Dollar Index elevated and capping valuation upside across non-ferrous metals. Middle Eastern geopolitical risk premiums will gradually fade amid improved shipping outlook for the Strait of Hormuz and easing overseas liquidity jitters, creating long-term bearish pressure on aluminum prices. 3.2 Supply: Overseas Capacity Resumptions & New Commissioning Run Parallel Overseas market developments include incremental production restarts across Middle Eastern smelters, alongside faster ramp-up schedules for newly commissioned overseas capacity. 3.3 Demand: Weakening Support from Export Orders Short-term backlogged orders will continue to underpin semi-finished aluminum export volumes, yet narrowing cross-market price spreads have softened market expectations for new export order intake, pointing to downside risks for export growth over the medium-to-long term. Market participants will closely monitor domestic seasonal peak consumption trends and overseas new order placement momentum. 4. Comprehensive Market Assessment All factors considered, the Shanghai aluminum market will face dual headwinds of macro valuation pressure and expanding supply volumes throughout H2 2026.

In H1 2026, the refined zinc industry struggled under multiple pressures. Ore supply remained tight, with both domestic and imported zinc concentrate TCs falling to record lows since data records began in 2013, directly squeezing smelter profits, and some enterprises have already fallen into losses. How will the refined zinc market develop in H2?