[SMM Analysis:Rare Earth Ore Imports Surge in Early 2026, Exceeding Demand and Causing Surplus] According to the latest data from the General Administration of Customs, from January to February 2026, China’s imports of mixed rare earth carbonate were about 3,013.7 mt, up 321% YoY. Over the same period, imports of unlisted rare earth oxides were about 12,860.4 mt, also posting a sharp increase of 209% YoY.

As supply and demand for construction steel were not fully matched across different markets, regional supply-demand mismatches created price differentiation, which in turn drove the cross-regional circulation of steel resources. When the regional price spread gradient was appropriate, regions with surplus construction steel capacity and production often shipped excess resources out, thereby rebalancing construction steel resources across regions.

Morocco has published the implementing decree for 'Law 82-21', officially enabling renewable energy self-consumption and surplus sales starting June 9, 2026. PV owners can now inject up to 20% of their annual production into the grid, earning up to MAD 0.21/kWh. To manage grid stability, the government capped total available capacity at 3,886 MW (72% solar). Research suggests this regulatory milestone could help unlock a 28.6 GW distributed solar market to support the country's broader low-carbon transition and future EV charging needs.

SMM Morning Meeting Summary: Overnight, LME copper opened at $12,093.5/mt. Early in the session, the center of copper prices gradually moved lower and fell to $11,754/mt, then fluctuated upward to a high of $12,228.5/mt, before seeing wide swings and finally closing at $12,211.5/mt, down 1.05%. Trading volume reached 46,900 lots, open interest stood at 288,600 lots, an increase of 239 lots from the previous trading day. Overnight, the most-traded SHFE copper 2605 contract opened at 92,500 yuan/mt and fell to 91,820 yuan/mt early in the session. The center of copper prices then fluctuated upward to a high of 95,530 yuan/mt, before fluctuating rangebound and finally closing at 94,920 yuan/mt, down 0.91%. Trading volume reached 153,000 lots, open interest stood at 197,000 lots, down 6,302 lots from the previous trading day, mainly due to long liquidation.

[SMM Silicon-Based PV Morning Meeting Summary: Polysilicon Prices Remained Slightly Weak, While Module Prices Were Overtly Stable but Softened in Practice] Over the weekend, N-type recharging polysilicon was quoted at 39.5-47.5 yuan/kg, the N-type polysilicon price index stood at 43.64 yuan/kg, and granular polysilicon was quoted at 40-43 yuan/kg. Polysilicon prices still appeared slightly weak over the weekend, with reports of some transactions concluded at low prices. Bearish sentiment among upstream and downstream enterprises persisted, and prices were expected to remain weak.

SMM, March 19: During the day, the most-traded SHFE lead 2605 contract opened at 16,571 yuan/mt. Prices edged up slightly in early trading, but upward momentum was limited and failed to surpass the night session high. In the afternoon, affected by the broad decline in base metals, lead prices quickly fell to 16,405 yuan/mt. Although SHFE lead prices rebound slightly toward the close, the rebound was limited, and it finally closed at 16,415 yuan/mt, posting a small bearish candlestick, down 235 yuan/mt, or 1.41%. Supply side, secondary lead smelters showed a strong willingness to hold prices firm, with limited spot order shipments and overall tight supply. Demand side, downstream battery enterprises mainly made just-in-time procurement, showing clear resistance to high premium quotations, with strong wait-and-see sentiment. Spot order transactions were sluggish, with only long-term contracts supporting a small amount of demand. Overall, the cost side of smelters still provided some support, but weak downstream demand constrained upside room. Lead prices were unlikely to see a trending market in the short term and would most likely maintain sideways movement within a range. Data source statement: Except for public information, all other data is derived by SMM based on public information, market communication, and SMM's internal database models, and is for reference only and does not constitute decision-making advice.

The US is expected to launch two new trade investigations into the “surplus industrial capacity” of 16 major trading partners, including China. According to officials from the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the move could trigger new tariff measures. In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun pointed out that the so-called “overcapacity” is utterly groundless, and that China firmly opposes using this as a pretext for political manipulation. Meanwhile, the European Commission also made its position clear: if the US takes actions that violate trade agreements, the EU will “respond firmly.”

Iran’s threat to drive oil prices up to $200 a barrel may sound like hyperbole, but as the energy crisis persisted, that outcome already looked more likely than US President Trump’s prediction that oil prices would soon pull back to pre-war levels… The conflict involving Israel and the US against Iran entered its third week — and escalated into one spanning the entire Middle East — yet the global oil benchmark’s response so far was surprisingly “mediocre.” Brent crude oil was currently trading near $100 a barrel, up about 65 from the start of the year. Although that level would have been unimaginable just a few weeks ago, it still remained below last Monday’s brief peak of nearly $120. Given that since the conflict began, the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz had trapped about one-fifth of global oil supply — roughly 20 million barrels a day — crude oil prices should, in theory, have been much higher. That seemed to suggest investors still retained a degree of trust in Trump , betting that the crisis would be resolved quickly and that the Strait of Hormuz would soon reopen — whether it was called the “Trump put,” the “TACO trade,” or “buy Trump,” many oil traders appeared to be wagering that the president would ultimately be able to limit the market damage. “When this is over, oil prices will come down very, very quickly,” Trump said on Monday this week. Yet that optimism looked increasingly difficult to reconcile with realities on the ground — whether on a battlefield where the conflict was intensifying, or in the physical oil market, where supply bottlenecks were steadily spreading. Signals Being Overlooked In fact, the physical crude oil market was sending an increasing number of stress signals, even though the international benchmark “paper oil” market had so far largely ignored them. Although trade had stalled under the impact of the Iran conflict, Middle Eastern crude benchmarks still surged to record highs, making them the most expensive crude in the world. The spike in these benchmark indicators, which are used to price millions of barrels of Middle Eastern crude sold to Asia, was raising costs for Asian refiners and forcing them to seek alternatives or make further production cuts in the coming months. S&P Global Platts said Dubai spot crude assessments for May-loading cargoes hit a record $157.66 a barrel on Tuesday, surpassing the previous all-time high of $147.5 set by Brent crude oil futures in 2008. That left Dubai crude’s premium to swaps at $60.82 a barrel, compared with an average premium of just 90¢ in February. Meanwhile, Oman crude oil futures hit a record high of $152.58 per barrel on Tuesday, with its premium to the Dubai swap set at $55.74 per barrel, versus an average premium of just 75¢ in February. Oman crude oil is exported from a terminal outside the Strait of Hormuz. This surge reflected massive uncertainty over actually available supply in the Middle East after Iran repeatedly attacked Oman's oil terminal and the UAE's major oil export terminal of Fujairah outside the Strait of Hormuz. Are Brent and WTI Failing to Reflect the "True Severity" of the Oil Market? As JPMorgan's head of commodities, Natasha Kaneva, pointed out in her latest research note on Tuesday , there was a clear mismatch between international benchmark crude pricing and the Middle Eastern geography of the supply disruptions. The core issue was that Brent and WTI are benchmark indicators at opposite ends of the Atlantic basin, while the current shock is concentrated in the Middle East. As a result, these benchmark crude prices were particularly influenced by relatively loose regional fundamentals—commercial oil inventory in both the US and Europe were ample in early 2026, and supply across the Atlantic basin was also relatively abundant in the short term. In addition, expectations for a release from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)—as well as a partial release that will soon materialize—further eased prompt tightness in Brent- and WTI-linked markets. By contrast, Middle Eastern crude benchmarks such as Dubai and Oman more accurately reflected the current dislocation in the physical market. Dubai and Oman spot prices were both trading above $150 per barrel, underscoring the severity of crude oil shortages originating in the Gulf region. These Middle Eastern oil prices were directly affected by export disruptions and therefore more effectively reflected marginal supply deficits than Atlantic-linked crude prices. Crucially, trade geography intensified this dynamic. Most of the crude transported via the Strait of Hormuz goes to Asia—before the outbreak of the Middle East conflict, about 11.2 million barrels of crude and 1.4 million barrels of refined products flowed through the strait to Asia each day. As a result, the direct physical shortage—and the surge in oil prices—was concentrated in Asian markets most dependent on Gulf crude. In fact, early signs of demand destruction had already emerged in Asia as product prices surged and spot crude became prohibitively expensive. JPMorgan noted that timing effects further reinforced this divergence. A typical voyage from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries to Asia takes about 10 to 15 days, while cargoes bound for Europe via the Suez Canal require nearly 25 to 30 days, or 35 to 45 days if rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope. Therefore, the impact of disrupted Gulf flows would hit Asian markets sooner and more severely, while Atlantic Basin benchmarks such as Brent and WTI would enjoy a longer buffer because of surplus inventory and slower supply adjustments. The US, with crude oil production exceeding 13 million barrels per day, would be affected the least. JPMorgan believed that, in this context, the apparent price stability shown by Brent and WTI should not be taken as evidence of adequate global supply. It reflected a temporary buffer created by regional surplus inventory, benchmark composition, and policy intervention. In fact, for refiners, especially those in Asia, the current crude oil shortage had already become a serious problem. About 60% of the region’s crude oil imports depended on the Middle East, and the difficulty of finding alternative, timely supplies was rapidly becoming acute. The pressure had already forced many countries into painful adjustments. Refiners across Asia had begun cutting run rates to conserve dwindling inventory. Some countries had banned exports of refined products, a defensive move that could further tighten the global market. As the crude oil shortage worsened, refined product prices surged. Asian jet fuel prices were approaching $200 a barrel, near the record high of about $220 reached earlier this month. The Crisis Could Spread Further Ultimately, this crisis was expected to extend beyond Asia. Data from analytics firm Kpler showed that Europe accounted for about three-quarters of Middle Eastern jet fuel exports shipped through the Strait of Hormuz last year—about 379,000 barrels per day—but since the conflict began, no such cargoes had passed through the strait. Unsurprisingly, jet fuel barge prices in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp refining hub had surged to a record $190 a barrel, exceeding the previous peak set after the Russia-Ukraine conflict in February 2022. The comparison with the Russia-Ukraine crisis may be even more compelling. Before the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, Russia supplied about 30% of Europe’s crude oil imports and one-third of its refined product imports. As traders feared Europe would lose supplies from one of the world’s largest oil producers, Brent crude rose to $130 a barrel after the Russia-Ukraine conflict—even though that worst-case scenario never fully materialized in the end. By contrast, according to Morgan Stanley, the physical disruption caused by the Iran conflict had already exceeded that level of concern by more than threefold. Even if the Strait of Hormuz were to reopen immediately, it would not bring immediate relief. According to the International Energy Agency, about 10 million barrels per day of production in the Middle East has been shut in since the conflict began. Restoring these flows will take weeks, if not months. To be sure, the oil market entered the Iran conflict in a relatively loose state, and the International Energy Agency had projected that global supply would exceed demand by about 3.7 million barrels per day. But that surplus has now been erased by the current turmoil. Last week, the International Energy Agency announced plans to release a record 400 million barrels from member countries' strategic petroleum reserves, which will help cushion the initial shock. But drawing down inventories cannot substitute for deliveries of new oil. In other words, the supply shock to the oil market is real and may persist. Once the Strait of Hormuz finally reopens, oil prices could initially plunge in a relief rebound, but given the harsh realities of the physical market, traders may need to think twice before betting that the return to normalcy promised by Trump is about to arrive…

Germany fed 438.2 TWh into its public grid in 2025. While solar generation surged 17.4% to a record 70.1 TWh (nearly tying with natural gas), overall renewable output dipped slightly, reducing its grid share to 58.6%. Wind remained the top energy source despite a 3.6% drop to 131.3 TWh. Conversely, fossil fuel generation increased to a 41.4% share, largely driven by a 10.2% jump in gas-fired output. Germany also narrowed its net electricity import surplus to 19.4 TWh.

SMM Alumina Morning Comment 2.26 Futures: The most-traded alumina 2605 futures contract opened at 2,879 yuan/mt overnight, hit a high of 2,883 yuan/mt, touched a low of 2,850 yuan/mt, and finally closed at 2,874 yuan/mt, up 4 yuan/mt from the previous day. Open interest increased by 8,601 lots to 314,000 lots. The phased tightness of spot cargo in certain regions provided some confidence to the market, but the industry surplus persists, and trading overall remains cautious. Technically, the closing price was above the MA5 (2,833.40), MA10 (2,838.10), and MA30 (2,795.20), indicating continued upward momentum. Meanwhile, the MACD indicator's DIF (23.59) crossed above the DEA (17.07), sustaining a golden cross at low levels, with the histogram at 13.06. Alumina futures are expected to be in the doldrums in the short term. Industry Dynamics: 1) According to a report by Ghana Web on February 14, Ghanaian President Mahama announced that Ghana plans to stop exporting unprocessed ore by 2030. The President stated that this move aims to support local processing enterprises, enabling them to lead the government's flagship industrial development and job creation plan. On February 13, 2026, President Mahama emphasized the importance of halting the export of unprocessed resources in a speech delivered in Addis Ababa. He advocated for enhancing the capacity of local processing enterprises to increase production and strengthen the value chain. Ore Side: As of February 25, 2026, the SMM imported bauxite index was reported at $61.33/mt, flat from the previous trading day. The SMM Guinea FOB average price was $37/mt, unchanged from the previous day. The SMM Guinea bauxite CIF average price was $60/mt, flat from the previous day. The SMM Australia low-temperature bauxite CIF average price was $58.5/mt, unchanged from the previous day, while the SMM Australia high-temperature bauxite CIF average price was $54.5/mt, down $1/mt from the previous day. The Malaysia bauxite CIF average price was $47/mt, unchanged from the previous day, and the Malaysia bauxite CIF (washed) average price was $59/mt, flat from the previous day. The Ghana bauxite CIF price was reported at $73/mt, unchanged from the previous day. The bauxite CFR (Turkey) price was $71.5/mt, flat from last Friday. According to an SMM survey, during the Chinese New Year holiday, some domestic mine mouths halted shipments, and current supply is slowly recovering. However, bauxite inventory at various alumina refineries remains above safe levels, leading to weak purchase willingness from alumina refineries. Prices continue to be contested, and further downside room is expected. For imported ore, no spot transactions were heard; however, against the backdrop of declining ore prices, alumina refineries maintain cautious sentiment towards bauxite procurement. Absolute inventory remains high, and overall purchase demand is weak. Additionally, some alumina refineries in north China reported that, amid tightening environmental protection policies, current ore storage must strictly comply with the requirement of using enclosed storage silos or covered stockyards. As a result, alumina refineries are controlling the pace and volume of bauxite transfers from port inventories to stockyards. It is expected that in the near term, imported ore prices will remain under pressure with fluctuations. SMM will continue to monitor the impact of domestic and overseas mine production, port shipments, and policy changes on prices. Spot prices: As of February 25, 2025, the SMM alumina index was reported at 2,618.49 yuan/mt, up 1.45 yuan/mt MoM; the SMM Shandong alumina index was reported at 2,548.51 yuan/mt, up 3.17 yuan/mt MoM; the SMM Henan alumina index was reported at 2,616.24 yuan/mt, up 0.52 yuan/mt MoM; the SMM Shanxi alumina index was reported at 2,602.39 yuan/mt, up 0.38 yuan/mt MoM; the SMM Guizhou alumina index was reported at 2,697.01 yuan/mt, up 2.25 yuan/mt MoM; and the SMM Guangxi alumina index was reported at 2,670.41 yuan/mt, up 0.74 yuan/mt MoM. Daily spot-futures price spread report: According to SMM data, on February 25, the SMM alumina index was at a discount of 234.51 yuan/mt against the latest transaction price of the most-traded contract at 11:30. Warehouse warrant daily report: On February 25, the total registered alumina warehouse warrants increased by 19,000 mt to 347,000 mt compared to the previous trading day. The total registered alumina warehouse warrants in Shandong remained unchanged at 17,701 mt, in Henan at 6,011 mt, in Guangxi at 12,613 mt, and in Gansu at 36,048 mt. In Xinjiang, the total registered alumina warehouse warrants increased by 19,000 mt to 275,000 mt compared to the previous trading day. Overseas market: As of February 25, 2026, the FOB Western Australia alumina price was $311/mt, with an ocean freight rate of $20/mt. The USD/CNY selling rate was around 6.89, and the converted domestic mainstream port selling price was approximately 2,656.47 yuan/mt, which is 37.98 yuan/mt higher than the SMM alumina index price. According to SMM model calculations, the import window remained closed. Summary: Before the holiday, domestic alumina market inventory continued to rebound, and the oversupply situation persisted. Supply side, alumina refineries in various regions gradually resumed production, driving up the overall industry operating rate. Weekly production increased by 11,000 mt WoW. In terms of inventory structure, aluminum smelters' raw material inventory increased by 18,000 mt WoW due to the arrival of previously purchased spot cargoes. In-factory inventory at alumina refineries increased slightly by 10,000 mt WoW, as production remained relatively stable and daily shipments were maintained. Meanwhile, warehouse warrants continued to grow due to strong futures performance and active point-price deliveries. Recent shipments have remained generally stable, with relatively small fluctuations in shipments under long-term contract, increasing by only 2,000 mt. Due to maintenance initiated by some enterprises and the shutdown of roasting operations in north China, short-term production has declined, leading enterprises to consume their in-factory inventory. It is expected that alumina inventory will show a slight destocking trend in the short term. [Except for publicly available information, other data are processed by SMM based on public information, market communication, and SMM's internal database model, and are for reference only, not constituting decision-making advice.]