As resource security and decarbonization become increasingly important, major economies are strengthening efforts to retain aluminum scrap. From the EU's review of export controls and the U.S. strategic asset proposal to Japan's circular economy initiatives and policies in the UAE and South Africa, these developments could reshape global scrap flows and affect secondary aluminum markets.

Copper is an irreplaceable material for power generation and has become a strategic resource in the AI era. A critical period is now approaching: the US Department of Commerce must submit a latest copper market assessment report by June 30, recommending whether the US should impose import tariffs on copper cathode.

[Tungsten News Flash] SMM June 5: On May 29 local time, the DRC Council of Ministers reviewed and approved a special decree, officially incorporating six mineral categories—lithium, tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, and rare earths—into the national strategic minerals list. According to the relevant provisions of the DRC's current Mining Code, strategic minerals are subject to a royalty rate of 10%, while the base royalty rate for ordinary non-ferrous metals is 3.5%. After the new policy takes effect, the royalty costs for local mining enterprises involved in newly designated strategic minerals such as lithium and tungsten will increase to nearly three times the original level. This expansion of the catalog is a significant implementation measure by the country to optimize critical minerals revenue distribution and strengthen control over domestic strategic resources. The policy will be officially implemented through a cabinet enforcement decree.

Overseas hafnium prices skyrocketed from $5,000 to $13,114.75/kg by April 2026, squeezed by AI-driven semiconductor demand and China's export controls, with high prices likely to persist.

Chapter 1: The Energy Crisis Reshapes Coking Coal Value In 2026, with the Russia-Ukraine war still ongoing and the U.S.-Iran war reigniting, crude oil price centers continued to shift upward. Coupled with persistent geopolitical conflicts in other regions worldwide, energy security demand climbed, driving a systematic revaluation of coking coal value. Moreover, against the backdrop of high oil prices, the cost advantages of coal-based chemicals over oil-based chemicals began to emerge, improving the economics of coal-to-oil substitution and expanding coking coal demand. Coking coal possesses the dual attributes of industrial raw material and energy commodity, supported by both rigid demand and high elasticity to energy prices, with premium capacity far exceeding that of ordinary industrial products. Market perception underwent a fundamental shift, as coking coal gradually shed its subordinate positioning within the steel industry chain and was upgraded to a scarce strategic energy asset. The energy crisis restructured its valuation logic. Pricing broke free from the singular steel supply-demand framework and was incorporated into the global energy price comparison system. Energy and security premiums elevated the valuation center, making it an important target for hedging geopolitical risks and allocating strategic resources. Chapter 2: Global Coking Coal Market Landscape (1) Global Coking Coal Resource Distribution Data source: publicly available data Global coking coal resources account for 13% of total global coal resources, approximately 1,140 billion mt. About 49% are distributed in Europe, 29% in Asia, and 19% in North America. The economically recoverable reserves of coking coal are approximately 500 billion mt, of which high-quality coking coal with low ash and low sulfur content amounts to only about 60 billion mt. Economically recoverable coking coal resources are primarily concentrated in three countries: Russia (42%, approximately 210 billion mt), China (23%, approximately 115 billion mt), and the US (18%, approximately 90 billion mt), with other countries accounting for relatively small shares. (II) Global Coking Coal Production Distribution Data source: publicly available data Global coking coal production in 2025 was approximately 1.1 billion mt, with a highly concentrated production landscape. China ranked first at 514 million mt, accounting for 47% of global production and serving as the core supply pillar, though virtually all output was consumed domestically. Australia (172 million mt) and Russia (98 million mt) ranked second and third, followed closely by the US (59 million mt), Mongolia (54 million mt), and Canada (32 million mt), while India produced 25 million mt and Indonesia produced 11 million mt. These eight countries collectively accounted for 88% of global coking coal production. Data source: World Steel Association, IEA Major producing countries: China firmly held the top global position with absolute volumes rising from 480 million mt (2020) to 514 million mt (2025), achieving the highest global increase of 34 million mt, primarily driven by new domestic mine commissioning and supply security policies. Russia and Mongolia became key growth contributors with increases of 12 million mt and 23 million mt respectively — the former benefiting from post-sanction market redirection and new mine development, while the latter achieved substantial production increases through upgraded border customs clearance with China and railway cost reductions. Australia's capacity remained basically flat. EU countries (Germany, Poland) and Ukraine continued to cut production due to factors such as coal phase-out policies, aging mines, and geopolitical conflicts, while the US, India, Mozambique and other countries achieved capacity growth driven by export demand and downstream industry boost. (III) Analysis of Global Coking Coal Export Trade Data source: publicly available data Global coking coal export trade is highly concentrated in five countries—Australia, Russia, Mongolia, the US, and Indonesia—primarily for the following reasons: Monopolistic resource endowment: Russia accounts for 42% of the world's recoverable coking coal reserves, and the US accounts for 18%. Australia possesses globally scarce high-quality coking coal resources with low ash and low sulfur content. Mongolia and Indonesia also have distinctive coal varieties suited to blending needs. These resource barriers create a supply-side monopoly. Locational and logistics cost advantages: Australia's coking coal producing regions are adjacent to east coast ports, enabling low-cost seaborne access to the world's core steel-producing regions. Mongolia's mining areas border China, with overland logistics providing direct access to the Chinese market. Russia, the US, and Indonesia leverage mature seaborne and cross-border railway networks to achieve efficient coverage of global demand markets. Industrial structure and supply-demand mismatch: Although China holds 23% of the world's coking coal reserves, as the world's largest steel producer, China has extremely rigid coking coal consumption demand, making it the world's largest coking coal importer. In contrast, the five countries mentioned above have limited domestic consumption and surplus coking coal supply. Their industrial structures are centered on resource exports, providing a supply foundation for large-scale exports. Coal quality and global demand matching: The coal varieties from these countries form a complementary supply system. Australian coal is suited to high-end coke demand, Mongolian coal serves as a premium blending raw material, Russian coal covers the full range of varieties, and US and Indonesian coal meet the blending needs of different steelmaking processes. This precisely matches the rigid blending needs of global steel enterprises, forming a stable export pattern. Chapter 3: China's Coking Coal Market (1) Current Supply and Demand of Coking Coal in China Data sources: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), General Administration of Customs of China, publicly available data Supply side, China's coking coal concentrate production grew steadily, rising gradually from 480 million mt in 2020 to 514 million mt in 2025, with overall supply scale remaining stable and no wild swings observed. Import and export side, imports became the core variable supplementing China's domestic supply: imports briefly declined 24% YoY to 54.768 million mt in 2021, then entered a sustained expansion trajectory, with 2025 imports surging 117% from 2021 to 118 million mt; exports remained at low levels over the long term, once plunging 89% YoY to 92,000 mt in 2021, then gradually rebounding, but the 2025 export volume of 1.175 million mt had minimal impact on the overall market. Demand side, coking coal concentrate demand also maintained mild growth, with 2025 demand reaching 628 million mt, a modest increase from 2020. Demand growth was primarily supported by the concurrent expansion of coke production (coke production reached 502 million mt in 2025). Overall, China's domestic coking coal production growth was unable to fully match demand expansion, with imported resources effectively filling the supply-demand gap. (II) China's Coking Coal Supply-Demand Balance Data source: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), publicly available data From 2020 to 2025, China's coking coal concentrate market completed a transition from tight supply to a tight balance with a slight surplus, with both supply and demand expanding simultaneously and market operational stability improving significantly. The supply side exhibited a sustained and steady growth trend, with the release of domestic capacity combined with supplementary import resources jointly driving continuous enhancement of supply capability. The demand side maintained mild expansion, primarily supported by rigid production demand from the coke and steel industries, with overall growth notably slower than the supply side. By phase, from 2020 to 2022, the market was in a state of persistent undersupply, with supply gaps appearing in all three years, and the industry was highly reliant on imported resources to fill the supply-demand gap. In 2023, the market reached a structural turning point, achieving a supply surplus for the first time; in 2024, the surplus scale expanded significantly; in 2025, the surplus pulled back, but the market had thoroughly shed its prolonged deficit status. With China's coking coal concentrate supply assurance capability continuing to improve, combined with flexible adjustment of import channels, the market entered a healthy tight balance range where supply was slightly greater than demand. Chapter 4: Global Coking Coal Supply-Demand Balance Data source: IEA, publicly available data From 2020 to 2025, the global coking coal market gradually shifted from maintaining a slight surplus to a slight supply-demand deficit. The long-term tightening of global premium coking coal resources, compounded by multiple external factors such as the restructuring of the global energy landscape triggered by the energy crisis and shifts in national energy policies, ultimately drove the global coking coal market from a relatively loose state in the earlier period to a slight deficit. Chapter 5: Summary Affected by geopolitical conflicts and energy transition, the strategic value of coking coal continued to rise, with energy security premiums becoming prominent, and the overall industry landscape gradually evolving toward a tight supply-demand balance. Global coking coal production is limited, with low-ash, low-sulfur premium resources being particularly scarce. Reserves, capacity, and export trade are all highly concentrated, with a few countries such as Russia, China, the U.S., and Australia controlling the supply side, forming a monopolistic landscape through advantages in resources, logistics, and coal grade complementarity, while the energy crisis brings new opportunities and challenges. Overall, coking coal markets both in and outside China have shifted toward a tight balance, with structural shortages of premium coal grades being a prominent issue. The coking coal market may hold up well throughout 2026.

The Indonesian government further strengthened natural resource export controls. Starting from June 1, exports of three categories of strategic resource commodities—palm oil, coal, and ferroalloys—will be managed uniformly through a government-designated state-owned enterprise. Indonesia's Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga stated at a press conference held on May 31 that the government established PT Indonesia Danantara Resources as the sole exporter of strategic natural resource commodities, aiming to strengthen national export supervision and governance through a "single window" mechanism.

The minutes of Xingye Silver&Tin's investor briefing announced on May 27 show: 1. Question: Mr. Sun! After the commissioning of Yinman Phase II, the plan is to mainly process lead-zinc-silver series ore, and the ore type and grade are expected to show relatively small changes compared to the Phase I lead-zinc system. Simply put, Zone 1 and Zone 4 are important resource replacement areas for Yinman Mining in the future, but currently they still belong to "potential zones" and cannot be directly classified into the "core rich ore" category like Orebody No. 17. Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! As of now, Orebody No. 17 is the main orebody that has been proven at Yinman. 2. Question: Hello, could you share the company's outlook on its own resources going forward and its assessment of the future market? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! As an important participant in China's mineral resources sector and one of the world's leading silver-tin polymetallic mining enterprises, the company is firmly optimistic about its strategic layout, resource reserves, and industry prospects. 3. Question: Mr. Sun, over the past two years, the company has continuously pursued project acquisitions with an expanding financing scale. Can talent and technology be guaranteed? Can timely operations and safety be ensured? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! In recent years, the company has prudently conducted project acquisitions and financing activities centered on its core business, with the overall expansion pace being controllable. Currently, the company has a complete talent pipeline and mature core technologies, and has established a standardized operational management and safety and environmental protection-related controls system, which can fully ensure the stable operation of all acquired projects and effectively prevent various risks. 4. Question: Mr. Sun, was your increase in shareholding in 2026 because you are optimistic about the company's several major projects this year? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Like other small and medium investors of the company, I am firmly optimistic about the company's potential investment value and plan to hold for the long term. 5. Question: @Director, Vice President and Board Secretary Sun Kai. Dear Secretary Sun, the company's Hong Kong IPO prospectus disclosed a 2026 tin production guidance of 5,500 mt, but Q1 production was only 777 mt, annualized at only 3,100 mt, far below the full-year guidance. May I ask: 1) Was the low Q1 production due to the technological transformation ramp-up of Yinman's copper-tin system, equipment commissioning, or low recovery rates? 2) What is the capacity release pace in subsequent quarters, and can the full-year guidance of 5,500 mt be achieved? 3) What are the timetable for reaching full production after technological transformation and the recovery rate improvement targets? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Based on the principles of comprehensive resource recovery and safe and efficient mining, the company simultaneously mines Orebody No. 17 and other copper-tin orebodies. For the company's production data, please refer to the periodic reports published on the company's designated information disclosure media. 6. Question: After the acquisition of Weiling Co., the company's related resources will inevitably be tilted toward that company. Please terminate the acquisition of Weiling Co. Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Regarding the progress of the Weiling Co. project, please follow the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 7. Question: What are the respective positioning of Xingye Silver&Tin A-shares, Xingye Silver&Tin H-shares, and Weiling Co.? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Regarding the progress of the Weiling Co. project, please follow the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 8. Question: Dear Board Secretary, is the Q1 performance sustainable? What are the current capacity and inventory of silver and tin respectively? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! In Q1 2026, the company's mined silver production was 78.95 mt and mined tin production was 777.33 mt. As of the end of Q1 2026, silver inventory was 15.04 mt and tin inventory was 83.67 mt. 9. Question: Is there a preliminary timetable for the Hong Kong listing? Can it be completed before the end of December this year? Among the company's plans, no projects have been implemented in Xinjiang yet. What kind of resources is the company planning for in the Xinjiang segment? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! The company will release progress announcements on designated media in a timely manner based on project developments. Please stay tuned! 10. Question: Dear Board Secretary, how does the company view the sustained growth in silver and tin demand driven by AI and new energy? Tin production was 8,900 mt in 2024, but the 2026 guidance was lowered to 5,500 mt. What is the core reason? What is the pace of subsequent capacity release for the Yinman technological transformation and the Morocco project? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! The materials related to the Hong Kong listing adopt the JORC Code, a technical standard developed by Australia. For example, the JORC Code defines "ore reserves" as the economically mineable part of measured and/or indicated mineral resources. The above standard differs to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data under planning and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 11. Question: Has the land certificate and construction permit for Yinman Phase II been obtained? Please do not respond with "please follow the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media." Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Yinman Phase II is expected to commence construction on July 1. After construction begins, the company will promptly disclose relevant progress announcements. Please stay tuned! 12. Question: Last year, the company was bullish on silver prices continuing to rise and chose to stockpile. Now silver prices are under pressure and the company did not hedge. Is the company still bullish on silver?The stock price has been continuously under pressure. Will the company proactively manage this? Xingye Silver&Tin replied: Thank you for your attention! As of now, the company has not conducted any futures hedging business. The company's hedging is carried out prudently at appropriate times based on actual production and operations as well as market conditions, with strict control over transaction risks. 13. Question: What is the current tin recovery rate at Yinman? The report for the Hong Kong listing shows a significant decline in grade. Is this in line with the company's current situation? If based on that report, it seems the company does not need to proceed with the Phase II expansion of Yinman, which appears somewhat contradictory. When will all of the company's capacity reach full production? After all capacity reaches full production, what will be the approximate production of silver and tin? Atlantic Tin has a gold exploration right. Could you briefly introduce the situation of that mine? Does the company have any plans to increase its equity stake in Far East Gold in the future? Xingye Silver&Tin replied: Thank you for your attention! The technical standards used in the Hong Kong listing materials are based on the JORC Code formulated by Australia. For example, the JORC Code defines "Ore Reserves" as the economically mineable part of Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resources. The above standards differ to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data in the long-term planning and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 14. Question: Hello, Secretary of the Board. The resource volumes and capacity plans for Yinman and Yubang Mining disclosed in the Hong Kong IPO prospectus are lower than the company's previous communication figures. What is the core reason? Is it due to differences in the JORC Code methodology (only including Measured and Indicated Resources, excluding Inferred Resources)? Does it involve resource reductions, grade downgrades, or mining plan adjustments? Is there room for future resource additions or upward revisions? Xingye Silver&Tin replied: Thank you for your attention! The technical standards used in the Hong Kong listing materials are based on the JORC Code formulated by Australia. For example, the JORC Code defines "Ore Reserves" as the economically mineable part of Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resources. The above standards differ to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data in the long-term planning and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 15. Question: Mr. Sun, based on the materials disclosed for the company's Hong Kong listing, the company's production of silver and especially tin is significantly lower than previous expectations. Is this estimate, this guidance, the company's true guidance, or a theoretical guidance made by SRK based on their assessment? Does the company plan to issue a medium and long-term guidance that is in line with the company's actual production plans to clarify these expectations?Otherwise, these expectations may have a significant negative impact on the company and noticeably undermine investor confidence. In fact, this is also unfavorable for the company's listing on international capital markets for financing and further development. Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! The Hong Kong listing-related materials adopt the JORC Code established by Australia as the technical standard. For example, the JORC Code defines "Ore Reserves" as the economically mineable part of Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resources. The above standards differ to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data in the long-term plan and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 16. Question: Mr. Sun, hello. The prospectus explains that there will be discrepancies between the Competent Person's planned mineral processing production schedule and the enterprise's actual situation. Could Mr. Sun please introduce the production plan for silver and tin from 2028 to 2030? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! The Hong Kong listing-related materials adopt the JORC Code established by Australia as the technical standard. For example, the JORC Code defines "Ore Reserves" as the economically mineable part of Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resources. The above standards differ to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data in the long-term plan and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 17. Question: Specifically regarding Yinman Mining: according to SRK's data, there will be significant grade decline in the future. In addition, the feed grade differs considerably from the company's disclosures in the 2025 annual report and previous annual reports. Is it necessary to issue a specific announcement to provide an explanation based on the different mining standards? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! The Hong Kong listing-related materials adopt the JORC Code established by Australia as the technical standard. For example, the JORC Code defines "Ore Reserves" as the economically mineable part of Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resources. The above standards differ to some extent from China's standards, resulting in certain deviations between the relevant data in the long-term plan and actual production and operations. Specific production data shall be subject to the data disclosed in the company's periodic reports. 18. Question: Have the specific construction commencement dates been confirmed for Yinman Phase II, Yubang Phase II, the Morocco tin mine, and the Budun Yingen mine managed by the controlling shareholder? Could you also provide the commissioning and full production timelines? Thank you. Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Yinman Phase II is expected to commence construction on July 1; the Yubang 8.25 million mt/year project is expected to commence construction in Q3; the Atlantic Tin project has obtained all construction permits and is currently carrying out preliminary preparation work including contractor tender and equipment transportation, with construction expected to commence in mid-July; all the above projects are expected to achieve commissioning with feed materials in Q4 2028. The managed company Budun Yingen plans to commence construction in Q4, with production expected to begin in 2029. 19. Question: Director Sun, in a previous institutional survey, you clearly stated that the company's quarterly tin production of 3,600 mt can be achieved on a regular basis. Is there an opportunity to achieve this quarterly target this year? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Adhering to the principles of comprehensive resource recovery and safe, efficient mining, the company simultaneously mines Orebody No. 17 and other copper-tin orebodies. For the company's production data, please refer to the periodic reports published by the company on designated information disclosure media. 20. Question: Does the company have the right to abandon the acquisition of the relevant equity in Weiling Shares? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! For the progress of the Weiling Shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 21. Question: Director Sun, in the records of a previous institutional survey, the company responded that Yinman's quarterly tin production of 3,600 mt can be achieved on a regular basis, but it seems this has not been realized subsequently. Is there a possibility of attempting to reach this record this year? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! Adhering to the principles of comprehensive resource recovery and safe, efficient mining, the company simultaneously mines Orebody No. 17 and other copper-tin orebodies. For the company's production data, please refer to the periodic reports published by the company on designated information disclosure media. 22. Question: Is there a plan to spin off minor metals other than silver and tin to Weiling Shares? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! For the progress of the Weiling Shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 23. Question: Has the matter of acquiring Weiling been terminated? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! For the progress of the Weiling Shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 24. Question: Has the company already dispatched personnel to take over the production and operations of Jiayu Mining? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! For the progress of the Weiling Shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 25. Question: After acquiring Weiling Shares, our company will become an AAH (Xingye Weiling H) publicly listed firm. What is the company's positioning for the three listing platforms? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention! For the progress of the Weiling Shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. 26. Question: In the company's 2025 annual report, the company stated "solidly advancing the subsequent acquisition and integration of Weiling Shares," but Weiling Shares has been subject to a delisting risk warning. What is the purpose of our acquisition of Weiling? Xingye Silver&Tin's response: Thank you for your attention!For updates on the progress of Weiling shares project, please refer to the relevant announcements disclosed by the company on designated media. Xingye Silver&Tin's Q1 report showed that from January to March 2026, the company achieved operating revenue of 2.13 billion yuan, up 85.32% YoY; net profit attributable to shareholders of the publicly listed firm was 1.338 billion yuan, up 257.32% YoY. As of March 31, 2026, the company's total assets were 19.689 billion yuan, and net assets attributable to shareholders of the publicly listed firm were 10.825 billion yuan. Operating revenue breakdown: From January to March 2026, the proportion of operating revenue from the company's main mineral products to total operating revenue was as follows: ore-derived silver (1.41 billion yuan, 66.21%), ore-derived tin (234 million yuan, 10.99%), ore-derived zinc (228.12 million yuan, 10.71%), ore-derived lead (71.85 million yuan, 3.37%), ore-derived antimony (53.1 million yuan, 2.49%), ore-derived gold (51.02 million yuan, 2.40%), ore-derived iron (44.17 million yuan, 2.07%), ore-derived copper (35.65 million yuan, 1.67%), and ore-derived indium (524,100 yuan, 0.02%). Among them, ore-derived tin and ore-derived silver combined accounted for 77.19% of total operating revenue. Xingye Silver&Tin's Q1 report stated that operating profit for the current period increased 238.16% compared with the previous period, total profit increased 236.36%, and net profit attributable to the parent company's shareholders increased 257.32%. The main reasons were: During the reporting period, the selling prices of the company's main mineral products such as silver and tin rose YoY; Yubang Mining's capacity was gradually released, with ore-derived silver production and sales increasing significantly YoY; and the transfer of 60% equity in Shuangyuan Non-ferrous realized investment income of 321 million yuan. Xingye Silver&Tin's 2025 annual report showed that in 2025, the company achieved operating revenue of 5.555 billion yuan, up 30.09% YoY; total profit of 2.096 billion yuan, up 18.75% YoY; and net profit attributable to shareholders of the publicly listed firm of 1.704 billion yuan, up 11.40% YoY. Xingye Silver&Tin's announcement showed that in 2025, the proportion of operating revenue from the company's main mineral products to total operating revenue was as follows: ore-derived silver (2.176 billion yuan, 39.17%), ore-derived tin (1.65 billion yuan, 29.70%), ore-derived zinc (975.87 million yuan, 17.57%), ore-derived lead (220.95 million yuan, 3.98%), ore-derived iron (180.38 million yuan, 3.25%), ore-derived copper (133 million yuan, 2.39%), ore-derived antimony (100.36 million yuan, 1.81%), ore-derived gold (82.34 million yuan, 1.48%), and ore-derived bismuth (16.67 million yuan, 0.30%). Among them, ore-derived tin and ore-derived silver combined accounted for 68.86% of total operating revenue. Regarding the company's main business and key performance drivers, Xingye Silver&Tin stated in its 2025 annual report: The company is a large mining group primarily engaged in the exploration, mining, and ore processing of non-ferrous metals and precious metals. As of the disclosure date of this report, the company had over 20 subsidiaries, of which 8 were operating mining companies, namely Yinman Mining, Qianjinda Mining, Yubang Mining, Rongguan Mining, Xilin Mining, Rongbang Mining, Ruineng Mining, and Bosheng Mining. Atlas Tin SAS under Atlantic Tin was in the construction phase for the Achmmach tin mine. Tanghe Times Mining was in a suspended construction phase, while Yitong Mining and Yunnan Xigui were in the exploration phase. Hainan Fund was primarily engaged in equity investment management; Xingye Gold (Hong Kong) was primarily engaged in metals and mining trading, corporate M&A, and was responsible for expanding markets outside China and acquiring quality mineral resources ex-China; Hainan Guomao and Tianjin Guomao were primarily engaged in non-ferrous metal mineral product sales and partial raw material procurement; Xingye Ruijin was primarily engaged in process research, technology R&D and upgrading in areas such as exploration, mining and processing, and comprehensive tailings recovery and utilization. Tibet Shannan Antimony Gold, Tibet Xinda Mining, and Xing'an League Fuxingtun Mining served as the company's regional resource integration platforms. During the reporting period, the company successfully acquired 85% equity in Yubang Mining. According to data compiled by the Silver Institute as of the end of 2023, Yubang Mining's monomer silver mine ranked first in Asia and fifth globally. This acquisition further strengthened the company's resource advantages and laid a solid resource foundation for sustainable development. Meanwhile, using its subsidiary Xingye Gold (Hong Kong) as the investment vehicle, the company increased investment in mineral resources outside China and successfully acquired 100% equity in Atlantic Tin. This acquisition was an important step in implementing the company's "going global" strategy. According to the classification standards for large-scale tin mines in the "Standards for Classification of Mineral Resource Reserve Scales" (DZ/T 0400-2022), the Achmmach tin mine owned by Atlantic Tin currently amounts to the equivalent of 5 large deposits. Through this integration of tin ore resources outside China, the company further improved its international tin ore layout and also reserved important strategic resources for long-term development. The company's main performance was derived from non-ferrous metal mining and processing operations. During the reporting period, revenue from non-ferrous metal mining and processing accounted for 99.64% of total operating revenue in 2025. Key factors affecting the operating performance of the mining and processing segment included production and sales volumes of major products, market prices, and costs of non-ferrous metal and precious metal mining and processing operations. Regarding the business plan, Xingye Silver&Tin stated in its 2025 annual report: 2026 is the concluding year of the company's "Second Three-Year" plan. The Board of Directors will closely focus on the theme of high-quality development, fully implement established work objectives, continue to deepen the philosophy of "Trust and Collaboration," and make an all-out push to achieve the closing targets of the "Second Three-Year" plan, with emphasis on the following areas of work: 1. Uphold the bottom line of safety and environmental protection. Using 2026 as the "Year of Safety Management Implementation," the company will comprehensively enforce safety responsibilities, consolidate the achievements of the "Year of Collective Safety Vigilance," strengthen risk anticipation and process control, resolutely prevent all types of safety and environmental protection incidents, and achieve safe, steady, green, and low-carbon development. 2. Advance key project construction at full speed, strengthen full-process management of project budgets, schedules, and quality, and coordinate the implementation of projects including the 2.97 million mt expansion of Yinman Mining, the 8.25 million mt expansion of Yubang Mining, the Morocco project, and the Budun Yingen Mining (under trusteeship) project, ensuring on-schedule completion, reaching full production, and releasing capacity benefits. 3. Continue to intensify exploration and reserve expansion efforts, properly balance production operations with geological exploration, steadily advance exploration of existing mines and surrounding areas, accelerate the conversion and upgrading of resource volumes, and continuously strengthen the resource foundation. 4. Deepen industrial synergy and resource integration. Leveraging the core regional advantages in Inner Mongolia, the company will steadily expand its resource layout outside China; adhering to silver and tin as the main business direction, it will enrich and optimize resource varieties. The company will solidly advance the subsequent acquisition and integration of Weiling shares, actively track quality mineral project opportunities in and outside China, and enhance overall competitiveness through synergistic industrial M&A. 5. Further strengthen institutional enforcement and internal control management, drive the effective implementation of various systems, processes, and control requirements, and enhance the company's refined management capabilities; strengthen enforcement capacity building to ensure production plans, comprehensive budgets, and various work deployments are fully implemented, and promote deep integration of corporate culture with business management. 6. Advance Hong Kong stock listing preparations at full speed, accelerate the establishment of a dual capital market platform at home and abroad, enhance cross-border capital operation capabilities, provide stronger financial support for the company's resource integration and strategy implementation, and drive the company's high-quality sustainable development to new heights. Reviewing the 2025 price performance of spot silver: the average price of SMM 1# silver (Ag99.99%) on December 31, 2025 was 18,430 yuan/kg, compared with 7,440 yuan/kg on December 31, 2024, representing an increase of 10,990 yuan/kg, or 147.71%. Recently, spot silver prices have been fluctuating. On May 27, the morning quote for SMM 1# silver (Ag99.99%) was 18,654–18,684 yuan/kg, with an average price of 18,669 yuan/kg, up 0.54% from the previous trading day. Compared with the average price of 18,430 yuan/kg on December 31, 2025, the price edged up by 239 yuan/kg, a gain of 1.3%. Regarding the outlook for precious metals, some institutions' views are as follows: FXTM Senior Research Analyst Lukman Otunuga stated: "As hopes for a US-Iran peace deal waver, gold prices have pulled back and are approaching the $4,450 support level. In addition, market expectations for a US Fed rate hike are steadily building amid conflict-driven price pressures, which is also exerting further downward pressure on gold prices." "Ultimately, if more signs emerge that price pressures are rising, it could further reinforce market bets that the US Fed will keep interest rates higher for longer, which would expose gold to greater downside risk." (Jin10 Data APP) CITIC Futures stated: Renewed tensions in US-Iran geopolitics have dampened risk appetite, while rising oil prices have reignited inflation concerns and strengthened market bets on a US Fed rate hike within the year, with multiple factors dragging silver prices lower. On one hand, US economic data still showed resilience, with the latest Chicago Fed National Activity Index for April at 0.14, significantly better than the previous reading of -0.15. The US May Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index and Present Situation Index both pulled back from prior readings, but the confidence index still beat market expectations. Combined with renewed US-Iran tensions pushing oil prices higher and sparking inflation concerns, market pricing for a year-end US Fed rate hike has strengthened. On the other hand, spot silver's fundamental drivers remained weak, with London market silver lease rates running at persistently low levels. In the short term, silver is expected to maintain a fluctuating trend, with overall capital interest still relatively low. Attention should be paid to US-Iran negotiation progress and strait navigation resumption. If US-Iran negotiations progress smoothly, this could drive a short-term silver rebound, but interest rate expectations will continue to suppress the trend. If geopolitical tensions escalate again and push oil prices higher, caution is warranted regarding further medium-term suppression of silver's industrial products elasticity and potential supply disruptions. Over the long term, weakening US dollar credibility, safe-haven demand, and investment demand provide solid support for silver prices. (Jin10 Data APP) A CITIC Securities research report noted that the resilience of the global economy is being tested by the Middle East conflict, with a glimmer of hope for the resumption of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. The US economy may continue to grow mildly but unevenly this year, the pace of the EU's weak recovery is being delayed, and Japan's private-sector demand will inevitably be disrupted by energy shortages. High oil prices are already pushing up global inflation, with headline inflation rates in Europe and the US likely to fluctuate at highs this year, while Japan's headline inflation rate may continue its mild performance. The US Fed may not cut interest rates at all this year, while potential rate hikes by the ECB and BOJ are imminent, and the "unrestrained" fiscal stance of Japanese and European political circles may constitute a source of market risk this year. We maintain our view that US equities will outperform US bonds and that the US dollar index has support, and gold prices are expected to break free from their predicament as tail risks of inflation dissipate. ANZ analyst Kumar, Soni recently stated that inflation expectations, rising US Treasury yield, and a stronger US dollar are unfavourable factors putting gold prices under pressure. These factors will persist until we can clearly determine how long this conflict will last. Gold has fallen more than 14% since the outbreak of war in late February. OANDA Senior Market Analyst Kelvin Wong stated that since early March, the overall trend of the 10-year US Treasury yield has remained in a medium-term upward phase. Therefore, at this juncture, gold bulls may not be as aggressive in pushing prices higher. Gold is expected to continue weakening over the next few trading days, with resistance at $4,645 and support at $4,456. (Jin10 Data) Goldman Sachs stated that central banks are expected to increase gold purchases, helping gold prices rebound by year-end. Analysts Thomas, Lina and Struyven, Daan stated in a research report published on May 15 that the average monthly central bank gold purchases in 2026 are expected to rise to 60 mt. Based on the revised accumulation model, the 12-month average of central bank gold purchases in March reached 50 mt, compared with a previous figure of 29 mt. Citing internal surveys, the analysts noted that central banks have long-term rigid allocation demand for gold, and recent changes in the geopolitical landscape are likely to continue driving countries to accelerate asset diversification. JPMorgan lowered its 2026 average gold price forecast from $5,708 per ounce to $5,243 per ounce. As demand is expected to re-accelerate in H2 2026, the base case still projects gold prices reaching $6,000/ounce by year-end.

The global copper scrap market is entering a period of structural tightening as geopolitical tensions and industrial policy increasingly reshape trade flows. The relationship between the United States and China sits at the center of this transition, particularly as Washington considers restricting exports of high-quality copper scrap in 2027 while China remains heavily dependent on imported secondary copper feedstock. China’s copper scrap imports remained strong in 2024 at 441,080 MT, underscoring continued demand from secondary refiners serving the EV, renewable energy, power grid, and manufacturing sectors. However, imports have collapsed in 2025 to 143,271 MT, with current projections for 2026 falling further to just 5,305 MT. The sharp decline signals a rapid deterioration in China’s direct access to imported scrap feedstock amid rising geopolitical friction and tariffs. China’s existing 10% tariff on US-origin scrap has already reduced the competitiveness of direct shipments, although clean high-grade material has continued to move because of favorable processing economics. Trade flows indicate that copper scrap is increasingly being rerouted through Southeast Asia rather than moving directly from the United States into China. US copper scrap exports to ASEAN rose from 170,687 tonnes in 2024 to 222,993 tonnes in 2025, while Chinese imports of copper scrap from ASEAN increased from 434,176 tonnes to 529,345 tonnes over the same period. The correlation strongly suggests ASEAN is emerging as a critical intermediary hub for scrap aggregation, processing, blending, and re-export into China. This shift reflects a broader restructuring of the global scrap trade as market participants adapt to tariffs, geopolitical risk, and the growing probability of tighter controls on high-quality US scrap exports. Countries such as Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are increasingly functioning as alternative routing channels within the global secondary copper supply chain. The timing is significant because the United States continues to export around 1 million tonnes of copper scrap globally in 2025 while domestic secondary refinery production remains limited at approximately 50kt. This imbalance is becoming central to the policy debate in Washington. As US demand for copper accelerates through grid modernization, electrification, AI-driven data center expansion, and defense manufacturing, policymakers are increasingly questioning whether high-grade recyclable copper should continue flowing overseas while the US remains dependent on imported refined copper. Current policy discussions focus on retaining a larger share of premium copper scrap within the domestic market beginning as early as 2027. Although proposals currently stop short of a full export ban, any retention mechanism would still materially reduce export availability for high-quality grades such as bare bright copper and No.1 copper scrap. For China, tighter access to premium scrap has important implications beyond the secondary market. High-quality scrap directly competes with refined copper cathode because it offers high recovery rates with lower processing intensity than primary smelting. If imported scrap availability continues to tighten, Chinese refiners will likely need to increase refined copper purchases to maintain output levels. This dynamic could become increasingly supportive for refined copper markets globally. The primary copper market is already facing structural constraints from weak mine supply growth, declining ore grades, permitting delays, and years of underinvestment in new projects. A simultaneous tightening in high-grade scrap availability would amplify pressure on refined copper balances precisely as demand linked to electrification continues to strengthen. As a result, the market could see narrower scrap discounts relative to cathode, firmer copper premiums in Asia, and increased volatility across both COMEX and LME pricing. The secondary copper market is therefore becoming an increasingly important variable in the broader refined copper outlook. Ultimately, the copper scrap market is no longer operating purely on economic arbitrage. Strategic resource security is becoming a defining driver of trade flows and policy decisions. The rapid growth in ASEAN intermediary trade, combined with collapsing direct Chinese scrap imports and growing US policy intervention, signals that the global copper supply chain is entering a new phase of fragmentation — one that is likely to tighten both scrap and refined copper markets into 2026 and beyond. Author: Shairaz Ahmed, Principal Market Analyst For more information or to discuss market dynamics, you can contact me on shairazahmed@smm.cn

[SMM Tin Midday Review: Newly Appointed Fed Chairman Reaffirmed Inflation Bottom Line Upon Taking Office, the Most-Traded SHFE Tin Contract Opened Higher Then Pulled Back]

Nickel Ore " Indonesia Officially Issues Presidential Decree Requiring Designated State-Owned Enterprises to Monopolize Strategic Resource Exports Starting This June " 1. Price Dynamics and HMA Revisions The Indonesian nickel ore price remained stable this week. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) has officially released the Nickel Mineral Benchmark Price (HMA) for the second half of May 2026. Nickel HMA: $18,849.3/dmt (up $1047.15 or 5.88% from $17,802.14 in early May). Cobalt HMA: $55,854/dmt. Iron Ore HMA: $1.58/dmt. Chrome Ore HMA: $6.37/dmt. Current port-delivered prices for 1.6% grade pyrometallurgical ore (saprolite) stand at $77.8-80.8/wmt. In contrast, 1.2% grade hydrometallurgical ore (limonite) is priced at approximately $28-33/wm.. 2. Supply-Demand Fundamentals and Weather Impacts For pyrometallurgical ore, unseasonal, abnormally heavy rainfall in the Central and South Sulawesi regions (Morowali and surrounding mining areas) has severely disrupted land transportation and barge transshipment. A series of micro-earthquakes (reaching up to magnitude M$1.9$) that occurred near Morowali between May 17 and 18 further exacerbated this impact. The combination of highly saturated soil moisture and minor crustal tremors has significantly increased the risk of landslides and slope instability, forcing mines to slow down their extraction and heavy-truck transportation pace for safety reasons. Therefore, even though the approval rate of regulatory quotas (RKAB) has reached approximately 90%, the spot supply of high-grade ore remains tight. To cope with exorbitant costs and tight supply, smelters are actively adopting cost-reduction strategies. These include blending low-grade ores into raw materials to lower the overall grade, promoting a unified premium pricing model of "HPM + USD $7–$10/wmt," and implementing standardized benchmarks for the chemical specifications of pyrometallurgical ore (Cobalt 0.05%, Iron 20%, Chrome 1%) to eliminate additional premiums for individual ore components. Meanwhile, the hydrometallurgical nickel ore market continues to suffer a severe disconnect from official pricing. The price of low-grade hydrometallurgical ore is under severe pressure and has completely failed to follow the upward trend of the new HPM. This price depression is primarily driven by the dual contraction of smelter operating rates and immediate raw material demand, with the core trigger being a potential production cut in Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate (MHP) caused by a sulfuric acid supply shortage in May. Against a backdrop of relatively stable inventory levels, MHP refineries are leveraging this low-capacity operating environment to aggressively suppress procurement bids, causing hydrometallurgical ore prices to continue hovering at low levels. 3. SMM Internal Estimates The new pricing formula has led to increased price divergence and amplified volatility, particularly influenced by higher associated cobalt content in certain ores. SMM calculations show that the new HPM for 1.2% grade limonite is approximately $49.95, significantly higher than current market assessments. The new HPM for 1.6% grade saprolite is $70.83; the inclusion of higher cobalt content in the new formula has markedly amplified price fluctuations. While actual market transaction prices currently remain above this benchmark, the gap is steadily narrowing. 4. Regulatory Quotas (RKAB) and Market Outlook According to the ESDM, RKAB approvals for 2026 have reached approximately 90%. SMM statistics indicate that the total approved quota for Indonesian nickel ore stands at roughly 240 million wmt. The macroeconomic and policy focus of the market has recently shifted, primarily concentrating on the following two major export and contract regulatory policies: DSI's Full Takeover of the Export Mechanism: The Indonesian government has confirmed that starting January 1, 2027, DSI will fully take over the export business of coal, palm oil, and ferroalloys. This policy will facilitate a smooth transition of the export mechanism in two phases. Since ferroalloys (including ferronickel, NPI, etc.) fall within the scope of this takeover, the market is closely evaluating the impact of this transition period on the export logistics and compliance costs of Chinese-funded smelters. Crackdown on Under-Invoiced Long-Term Contracts: The Indonesian government emphasized that it will honor existing, valid long-term export contracts to maintain commercial credit. However, at the same time, the government will strictly investigate and punish long-term contracts suspected of "under-invoicing" (low-price customs declarations). It is reported that relevant Indonesian departments will soon hold consultations with major industry associations to ensure a smooth policy transition while plugging loopholes that lead to tax revenue losses from underpricing. Nickel Pig Iron " Supply-Demand Price Gap Widens; Short-Term Prices to Fluctuate within a Range " The average price of SMM 10-12% NPI average price fell by RMB 5.7 per nickel unit week-on-week to RMB 1140.3 per nickel unit (ex-works, tax included), while the Indonesia NPI FOB index dipped by USD 1.37 USD per nickel unit to an average of USD 146.52 per nickel unit. Downstream purchasing sentiment dropped even more visibly, intensifying the divide in market mindsets between buyers and sellers. On the supply side, existing NPI production cutbacks, coupled with recent disruptions from Indonesian export policy updates, have gradually tightened spot availability. Consequently, upstream producers are holding back cargo to defend their asking prices, generally keeping their offers firm. Sellers only slightly softened their quotes under the weight of weak futures markets, and their willingness to offload cargo at lower price levels remains low. This expectation of tighter market supply provides a solid floor for prices. On the demand side, pressure remains acute. The stainless steel market lacks upward momentum, forcing steel mills to adopt a highly cautious procurement stance centered strictly around hand-to-mouth restocking. Furthermore, as the price-to-performance advantage of stainless steel scrap expands, downstream buyers are pushing hard for discounts. Target buying prices remain heavily clustered between RMB 1,120 and 1,130/mtu, leaving a massive spread against upstream asking prices that makes reconciling the two sides very difficult. Market Outlook: While expectations of tightening supply will support spot prices, the weak futures market and competitive pricing from alternative raw materials will continue to cap upside gains. Accordingly, high-nickel pig iron prices are expected to exhibit a high-level, range-bound volatile trend next week.