July 31, 2026 Whenever economic growth begins to weaken, many investors instinctively turn their attention to gold and silver as traditional safe-haven assets. Yet reality is more complex than the familiar "safe haven" narrative. While both precious metals tend to benefit from periods of economic uncertainty over the long term, they often follow very different patterns during recessions. Investors who understand these differences can position their portfolios more effectively. Paradoxically, the prices of both gold—and especially silver—often decline during the initial stages of a severe crisis. This is not because investors suddenly lose confidence in precious metals, but because individuals and institutions urgently need liquidity. In times of market stress, investors frequently sell their most liquid assets, including gold and silver, to meet margin calls or raise cash. History Shows That Liquidity Comes First During the Initial Phase of a Crisis The global financial crisis of 2008 provides a clear example. As the crisis intensified, the gold price fell from nearly US$1,000 to around US$700 per ounce before recovering by year-end and eventually reaching new all-time highs. Silver suffered a much sharper decline, dropping from approximately US$21 to below US$9 per ounce, a decline of more than 50%, while gold lost only about 12% during the same period. A similar pattern emerged during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Both precious metals initially declined sharply, but silver once again proved considerably more volatile, falling from around US$18 to US$12 per ounce within just a few weeks. Gold also weakened but experienced a much more moderate correction. History repeatedly demonstrates that the urgent need for liquidity can temporarily drive down the prices of both gold and silver. Yet it also shows that investors who panic and sell during these periods often miss the powerful recovery that typically follows. Once the Recovery Begins, Silver Historically Outperforms Gold This is where the second—and perhaps most important—historical pattern emerges. During the recovery phase following a recession, silver has historically outperformed gold by a considerable margin. Following the 2008 financial crisis, silver gained approximately 400% from its lows, while gold appreciated by roughly 170%. This outperformance generally begins once the urgent need for liquidity subsides and investors return to risk assets. The same phenomenon occurred after the initial COVID-19 market shock. During 2020, silver advanced by nearly 48%, while gold gained approximately 25%. One of the primary reasons for silver's stronger performance is its dual role. Gold functions primarily as a monetary asset and store of value. Silver, by contrast, combines monetary demand with substantial industrial demand. As economic conditions improve, both sources of demand recover simultaneously, providing additional support for silver prices. Why Gold Performs Well During Recessions Gold benefits from several supportive factors during economic downturns. Central banks typically lower interest rates in an effort to stimulate economic activity, reducing the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset such as gold. At the same time, demand increases for assets without counterparty risk, particularly as confidence in equities, bonds, and sometimes even financial institutions begins to deteriorate. A review of six major U.S. recessions shows that gold prices increased during five of those downturns, declining only modestly during the 1990–1991 recession. There is, however, an important exception. If central banks aggressively raise interest rates to combat inflation—as they did in the early 1980s, when U.S. interest rates reached nearly 20%—gold can come under pressure even while the broader economy is contracting. The Great Depression: An Extreme Case A depression differs from a normal recession in both its severity and duration and is often accompanied by deflation. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, the official U.S. gold price remained fixed at US$20.67 per ounce under the gold standard. Gold's ability to preserve wealth therefore appeared not through price appreciation but through its purchasing power. As consumer prices fell by approximately 24%, gold maintained its nominal value, resulting in a significant increase in real purchasing power. In 1934, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt raised the official gold price to US$35 per ounce, effectively increasing its value by approximately 69% overnight. This change resulted from government policy rather than market forces. At roughly the same time, the U.S. government issued Executive Order 6102, requiring private citizens to surrender much of their gold holdings. This historical episode illustrates that during severe depressions characterized by fixed exchange rates or a gold standard, government policy may exert greater influence over precious metals than normal market supply and demand. Similar developments occurred in Europe during the Napoleonic Wars, when Austria, following its defeat at the Battle of Austerlitz, devalued its currency by roughly 80% against gold. What This Means for Investors Several practical lessons emerge from history. First, short-term declines in gold—and particularly in silver—during the early stages of a crisis should not be interpreted as evidence that precious metals have failed. Rather, they reflect the market's temporary scramble for liquidity. Second, investors who maintain long-term holdings of physical gold and silver in the form of coins or bullion have historically benefited disproportionately from the subsequent recovery, with silver generally delivering the stronger rebound. Third, stagflationary environments—where weak economic growth coincides with persistent inflation, as experienced during the 1970s—have historically been particularly favorable for silver because both its monetary and industrial demand tend to strengthen simultaneously. For investors seeking to protect their wealth against the uncertainties of a recession—or even a full-scale depression—gold and silver should therefore be viewed not as short-term speculative trades, but as long-term components of a well-diversified investment portfolio. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-and-silver-during-a-recession-how-do-precious-metals-really-perform

Published: Jul 29, 2026 - 3:35 AM (Kitco News) - The gold market is struggling to hold support above $4,000 and could face further selling pressure, as one bank says a recovery remains unlikely as long as the war in Iran persists. On Tuesday, commodity analysts at Commerzbank led by Thu Lan Nguyen downgraded their gold price forecast for the second time in as many months. The German bank now expects gold prices to end the year around $4,500 an ounce, down from its revised June forecast of $4,800. At the same time, Commerzbank also lowered its year-end silver price target to $67 an ounce from its previous estimate of $80 an ounce. In the report, Nguyen said the price downgrade reflects the fact that persistent inflation pressures continue to force the Federal Reserve to maintain a tightening bias. However, she added that market expectations have become too aggressive, giving gold prices some room to recover from their current lows by the end of the year. She added that gold still has a path to $5,000 an ounce in 2027 if inflation pressures moderate. However, she said the biggest factor remains the uncertainty surrounding the war with Iran, saying that the ongoing conflict in the Middle East continues to overshadow all the bullish factors that drove gold prices to record highs at the start of the year. “This is partly because the US, as an energy exporter, benefits from the current energy crisis – as evidenced by the sharp rise in its oil exports in recent months. The risk premiums in the foreign exchange market are sending a similar signal: After Liberation Day – i.e. the introduction of extensive US tariffs by the US government – hedging against a depreciation of the dollar relative to the euro became significantly more expensive (as reflected in positive EUR-USD risk reversals, see figure below). Since the outbreak of the Iran war, however, the dollar has again been regarded as safer than the euro. As long as this remains the case, gold is unlikely to benefit disproportionately from increased demand for safe havens,” she said. Despite the heightened geopolitical uncertainty, Commerzbank said there is little evidence that the conflict is having a lasting impact on the U.S. economy. Nguyen pointed out that although near-term inflation pressures have increased, long-term inflation expectations remain anchored. She said that in this environment, it is unlikely the Federal Reserve will adopt a sufficiently aggressive monetary policy stance to alter gold's longer-term bullish outlook. “There is potential for the gold price to recover from its current level, as we consider current market expectations of Fed rate hikes to be excessive and anticipate that Fed interest rates will remain unchanged until the end of the year. The Fed is likely to raise interest rates only if inflation trends force them to do so,” she said. “Our economists’ base-case scenario, in which core inflation does not rise significantly above the assumed monthly rates consistent with the target in the coming months, remains unchanged. In this scenario, the Fed would likely refrain from raising interest rates and might even cut its key interest rate from mid-2027 onwards, as the 2% target would then be reached in spring 2027.” Nguyen explained that although gold’s months-long correction has damaged market sentiment, there are still significant long-term drivers supporting higher prices. Nguyen said the bank's long-term bullish outlook remains intact because the structural drivers that fueled gold's rally earlier this year have not disappeared. She noted that growing skepticism toward the U.S. dollar as a traditional safe-haven asset, driven by unpredictable U.S. policy, continues to support demand for bullion. At the same time, the freezing of Russia's foreign exchange reserves has prompted many central banks to reassess the security of their reserve assets, accelerating diversification into gold. Finally, mounting government debt across advanced economies has raised concerns about the long-term safety of sovereign bonds, further enhancing gold's appeal as an asset that is institutionally independent and carries no default risk. Source： https://www.kitco.com/news/article/2026-07-28/commerzbank-downgrades-gold-and-silver-prices-middle-east-conflict-takes

July 27, 2026 After several months of correction, the silver market is once again attracting increased investor attention. Following significant price declines earlier this year, signs of stabilization have begun to emerge. The US$60 per ounce level is increasingly developing into the key technical hurdle. A sustained breakout above this level could trigger the next leg higher, while another rejection would likely point to continued volatility in the near term. Silver Benefits from Both Industrial and Investment Demand Unlike gold, silver serves a dual purpose. In addition to its role as a precious metal and store of value, it is also an essential industrial metal. Demand from the solar industry, electronics, electric vehicles, and numerous high-tech applications remains robust, contributing to a physical market that has been operating in structural deficit for several consecutive years. Industry analysts expect this supply deficit to persist throughout 2026. The broader macroeconomic backdrop also remains supportive. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, rising energy prices, and growing concerns about stagflation continue to enhance the appeal of precious metals. While gold is primarily viewed as a monetary safe haven, silver also benefits from its industrial applications and therefore often responds even more dynamically to changes in the global economic outlook. US$60 Remains the Key Technical Level Following several consecutive sessions of gains, silver recently traded just below—or briefly around—the US$60 per ounce level. As a result, this price area has become the market's primary technical resistance. Many market observers believe that a sustained move above US$60 would represent an important breakout, potentially opening the door to further upside. At the same time, volatility remains elevated. Temporary pullbacks toward the US$57–58 range demonstrate that profit-taking can emerge at any time, while investor sentiment continues to react quickly to movements in Treasury yields, the U.S. dollar, and geopolitical developments. Nevertheless, the short-term technical picture has improved noticeably. Several technical analysts point to strengthening momentum after silver reclaimed key moving averages during the recent recovery. Fundamentals Continue to Support the Market From a fundamental perspective, the outlook also remains constructive. The global energy transition continues to drive demand for silver in solar panels, power grids, and electronic components. At the same time, the metal is becoming increasingly important in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, data centers, and advanced electronics. Should inflation remain persistent while real interest rates begin to decline again over the medium term, both gold and silver are likely to benefit. However, silver enjoys an additional advantage: unlike gold, it is supported by both investment demand and industrial consumption. Conclusion The silver market is approaching an important decision point. In the short term, price action will continue to be driven by geopolitical developments, oil prices, the U.S. dollar, and interest-rate expectations. Over the medium to long term, however, the combination of strong industrial demand, an ongoing structural supply deficit, and an increasingly challenging macroeconomic environment continues to provide a supportive backdrop for silver. Whether this ultimately develops into the next major rally will largely depend on whether silver can establish itself convincingly above the US$60 level. A successful breakout would significantly improve the technical outlook and shift investors' attention toward the next major resistance zones. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/silver-price-approaches-a-key-turning-point-will-it-break-above-ususd60

July 27, 2026 The potential bottoming process in the gold market around the US$4,000 level remains highly volatile. After breaking above the downtrend line that had capped prices since the end of May, gold quickly rallied to US$4,165 before giving back almost all of those gains yesterday as tensions surrounding the Iran conflict and rising oil prices escalated once again. Price action around the psychologically important US$4,000 level therefore remains fragile and extremely volatile. One day, gold gains US$100; the next, it gives back US$100. Nevertheless, the prospects for a successful bottoming process, followed by a trend reversal and a broader recovery—or even a summer rally—remain intact. Gold Reflects the Reshaping of Global Markets Financial markets continue to be driven by an unusually dense combination of geopolitical uncertainty and structural changes in the global monetary system—and nowhere is this more evident than in the gold market. Following its record high of approximately US$5,600 per ounce in January, gold corrected sharply to just below US$4,000, pressured by profit-taking, the Iran war, rising interest rate expectations, and a modest strengthening of the U.S. dollar. During the second quarter alone, gold declined by around 14%, while silver lost approximately 22%. However, interpreting this correction as the end of gold's long-term bull market would confuse a cyclical pullback with a structural change in the market. The underlying fundamentals continue to support the view that January's record high did not mark the end of the secular bull market. Central Banks Remain the Primary Driver The underlying pillar of the gold bull market continues to be central bank demand. Over the past four years, central banks around the world have purchased an average of 1,000 tonnes of gold annually—roughly double the pace seen during the previous decade. According to the latest survey by the World Gold Council, 45% of reserve managers expect to increase their gold holdings over the next twelve months. This trend is not simply a short-term hedge against market volatility, but rather reflects a long-term strategy of diversifying away from the U.S. dollar as the sole anchor of the global monetary system. De-Dollarization Continues to Gain Momentum The broader geopolitical landscape reinforces the ongoing trend toward de-dollarization. While the United States continues its aggressive—but strategically unfocused and, under international law, illegal—military campaign and air war against Iran using the weapons of the 20th century, Tehran has responded with an asymmetric strategy. One U.S. military installation after another across the Middle East is being targeted with remarkable precision using missiles, drones, and cruise missiles. Before long, the United States may find itself running short not only of precision-guided munitions and air defense systems—including air-to-air, surface-to-air, and missile defense interceptors—but also of viable operating bases. Without functioning runways and adequate fuel supplies, the paradigm shift in modern warfare unfolding over the Persian Gulf may become impossible to ignore, even for the West. The precision of Iran's attacks is, of course, being significantly supported by China and Russia, as neither country is prepared to allow Iran to collapse. Against this backdrop, one of the most remarkable developments in recent weeks has received relatively little attention. Beginning July 24, China's largest banks—including the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)—will suspend retail paper gold trading through the Shanghai Gold Exchange. Officially, the move is intended as a risk-management measure following a period of elevated volatility during which retail investors suffered significant losses on leveraged products. Speculative paper-gold trading is being curtailed, while physical gold ownership, gold savings plans, gold ETFs, and the reserve strategy of the People's Bank of China remain unaffected. Regardless of the official justification, the move can also be interpreted as another step away from a financial system in which Western paper markets such as COMEX and the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) facilitate price discovery through extensive leverage, allowing multiple paper claims to exist for every physical ounce of gold. By encouraging Chinese investors to shift toward physical ownership, China is gradually changing the balance of power between the paper and physical gold markets. The development recalls historical precedents such as the collapse of the London Gold Pool in 1968, although this time the transition is more likely to be gradual, orderly, and largely unnoticed. Geopolitics Meets Stagflation This monetary realignment is unfolding against a geopolitical backdrop that has become increasingly concerning even for seasoned market observers. According to the International Monetary Fund's World Economic Outlook, the conflict in the Middle East is already weighing measurably on global economic growth, which is projected to reach only around 3.1% in 2026. At the same time, warnings from former U.S. military officials regarding Iran's asymmetric strategy against U.S. and Israeli air forces operating in the Gulf underscore how fragile the regional security architecture has become. For gold, traditionally regarded as a crisis hedge and store of value, this environment represents a structural tailwind—even if higher interest rates and persistent demand for U.S. dollar liquidity have weighed on prices in the short term. Meanwhile, the sharp rise in oil prices over the past three weeks has brought the stagflation scenario that we have repeatedly outlined back into focus. Stagflation—the toxic combination of weak economic growth, high inflation, and rising unemployment—creates a particularly difficult environment for investors, as conventional monetary policy tools often become ineffective or even counterproductive. During such periods, financial assets and fixed-income investments tend to lose purchasing power in real terms, while tangible assets such as commodities, defensive high-quality equities, and particularly gold have historically served as reliable stores of value. Gold as a Top Performer During Stagflation Every economic regime favors different asset classes. © VanEck Gold tends to perform particularly well during periods of stagflation because its value does not depend on the creditworthiness of an issuer and it cannot be eroded by negative real interest rates. When inflation remains persistently high, economic growth weakens, and confidence in fiat currencies, government bonds, and policymakers continues to deteriorate, gold regains its traditional role as a scarce, liquid, and globally recognized store of value. The experience of the 1970s illustrates this dynamic particularly well. During that decade's stagflationary environment, gold not only served as an effective hedge but also became one of the very few asset classes capable of preserving purchasing power in real terms. Gold Battles Around the US$4,000 Level – Bottoming Process Remains Intact Gold in U.S. Dollars, Daily Chart as of July 24, 2026. © Gold.de Since the latest sharp decline ended at US$4,023 on June 11, gold has been attempting to establish a bottom around the psychologically important US$4,000 level. After six weeks, this process has produced a nervous back-and-forth trading pattern and one lower low at US$3,942. At the same time, however, the bears have failed to make any decisive progress over the past six weeks. The weekly chart remains clearly oversold, while the daily chart continues to display positive divergences, suggesting at least the potential for a technical rebound. On some days, buyers regain control and push gold US$100 to US$200 higher within hours. A few days later, the bears return, quickly reclaiming most of those gains on heavy trading volume. It is a highly volatile battle in an exceptionally challenging market environment, with equity markets repeatedly coming under pressure, bond yields moving higher, and rising oil prices once again dominating the news flow. A Move Above US$4,100 Could Trigger the Next Rally The gold bulls nevertheless scored an important technical victory on Tuesday when prices broke above a downtrend line that had been in place since the end of May. Although nearly all of those gains were surrendered again on Thursday, the overall market structure has improved modestly. Should gold now manage to reclaim and hold above the US$4,100 level, another key downtrend line would be eliminated. Such a breakout could open the way toward the upper Bollinger Band on the daily chart, currently located around US$4,181, followed by the declining 50-day moving average near US$4,231. If the current bottoming process ultimately develops into a confirmed trend reversal, gold could, under favorable conditions, advance toward the 200-day moving average, now situated around US$4,494. This average currently aligns closely with the broader downtrend that has been in place since the January peak and therefore remains the key technical reference for the medium-term outlook. Overall, our expectations remain unchanged. We continue to believe that the bottoming process is likely to succeed and still see a recovery toward US$4,200 and US$4,300, with a subsequent move toward approximately US$4,500 remaining a realistic possibility. However, we are not yet prepared to declare that the broader correction has come to an end. Conclusion: Nervous, but the Bottoming Process Remains Intact While the gold market continues to be driven in the short term by geopolitical developments, interest-rate expectations, U.S. dollar movements, and oil prices, the broader picture remains supportive for precious metals. The fact that gold has so far managed to defend the US$4,000 area despite the recent sharp swings is less a sign of weakness than evidence of a market attracting value-oriented buyers following a significant correction. As long as central banks continue to accumulate gold, geopolitical risks remain elevated, and real interest rates fail to provide a compelling alternative, the longer-term market structure remains constructive. The combination of slowing economic growth, persistent inflation, and increasing global uncertainty continues to support gold's role as a monetary safe haven. Stagflation is not an environment in which investors typically chase high-growth assets. Instead, it is one in which scarcity, liquidity, and capital preservation regain importance. Historically, these have been precisely the conditions under which gold has demonstrated its greatest strength—not as a perfect predictor of the next trading session, but as a strategic hedge in an increasingly fragile economic and monetary landscape. Source: https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-nervous-but-the-bottoming-process-remains-intact

July 10, 2026 Although the price of gold has regained the $4,100-per-ounce mark, analysts at Metals Focus say the precious metal is set to undergo a summer consolidation for the time being. However, this phase offers promising prospects: Later in the year, strong fundamental drivers are likely to push the price significantly higher again. Interest rate fears and a seasonal lull are dampening short-term momentum Currently, the market is primarily on edge due to U.S. monetary policy. New geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, as well as the immense investment boom in the field of artificial intelligence, are keeping inflation stubbornly high. This is fueling market concerns that the Federal Reserve could raise interest rates again this year. For gold, which generates no current income, rising opportunity costs represent a strong headwind and cap any rapid upward breakout. Compounding this is the typical seasonal weakness. July and August are traditionally considered slow months for physical demand. The already high price level has recently caused a noticeable slowdown in jewelry consumption and general retail interest. Even though there are initial, tentative signs of recovery in key Asian markets such as China and India, the typically strong demand phase there will not begin until late summer at the earliest. The current trading range is therefore likely to persist throughout the summer months. Structural drivers remain intact: Comeback expected in the fall Despite these short-term hurdles, experts at Metals Focus do not see the broader bull market as being in any danger. A breakout from the sideways trend will become more likely once the market’s interest rate speculation cools down. There are strong indications that the U.S. Federal Reserve will ultimately leave key interest rates unchanged for the remainder of 2026. To avoid an economic slowdown or even a recession, policymakers are likely to grudgingly tolerate moderate inflation above their target, according to the analysts. As soon as the market prices in this easing of monetary policy—expected sometime during the third quarter—the gold price will once again have room to rise. The structural pillars underpinning the recent record-breaking rally remain unshaken, according to Metals Focus. Persistent geopolitical risks—particularly given Iran’s focus on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz—continue to warrant high risk premiums. Coupled with the mounting uncertainty surrounding the U.S. elections, the ambitious valuations in the stock markets, and concerns about the U.S. dollar, the fundamentals for the precious metal remain extremely robust. Those who weather the current summer lull will be well-positioned: In the medium term, gold remains the preferred safe haven and an essential component of portfolio diversification, the report concludes. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-price-a-summer-breather-before-the-next-rally

July 9, 2026 Despite the escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, gold is losing its lustre as a safe haven for the time being. Rather than benefiting from the renewed tensions between the US and Iran, precious metals remain in the stranglehold of macroeconomic factors: A sharp rise in oil prices, climbing US yields and a strengthening dollar are dominating market activity, pushing spot gold down to around US$4,074 per ounce, whilst silver slips to around US$58.12. Macroeconomics trumps geopolitics Even following the weak US labour market report for June, which briefly fuelled hopes of a more accommodative monetary policy, the outlook for precious metals looked positive. However, this positive effect quickly faded with the publication of the latest Fed minutes , which underline the US Federal Reserve’s continued focus on persistent inflation. At the same time, the military escalation in the Strait of Hormuz is driving massive market volatility. Following clashes between the US and Iran, oil prices surged sharply, with WTI and Brent initially soaring by around six per cent to US$74.93 (WTI) and US$78.73 (Brent) per barrel respectively. However, this crisis situation did not trigger a flight-to-safety reaction for the price of gold. Rather, the surge in oil prices fuelled fresh inflation fears and expectations of higher interest rates in the longer term. As a result, the yield on ten-year US government bonds climbed to over 4.58 per cent, pushing the dollar index to its highest level since early July. Silver was hit even harder, as concerns over the industrial economy put further downward pressure on its price and widened the gap with gold even further. Key technical levels in focus Due to these economic headwinds, the bears have taken the upper hand in the short term. Spot gold hit a five-day low of US$4,022 and failed in its attempt to reclaim the 20-day moving average. On the downside, a break below the US$4,041.65 level is now seen as the next negative signal, which could pave the way towards US$3,942.10 and US$3,886.46. For a noticeable improvement in the chart picture, prices would first need to break through the resistance zone between US$4,162.36 and US$4,214.34 in order to target the 50-day moving average at US$4,372.44. Technical weakness is also weighing on sentiment for silver. The market recently tested the key support zone between US$59.44 and US$58.53. If this level gives way, there is a risk of further declines down to the region around US$55.60 or even US$50.00. Only a return above US$63.28 would unlock new potential and once again make the moving averages beyond the US$70 mark realistic targets. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/current-gold-and-silver-prices-rising-interest-rates-and-the-us-dollar-are-holding-back-precious

July 6, 2026 Despite current headwinds from high U.S. yields and a strong dollar, HSBC believes the gold price still has further upside potential through the end of 2026. While the precious metal is currently trading within a narrow range in the short term—as higher real yields increase the opportunity cost of this non-interest-bearing asset—analysts remain extremely bullish on the long-term investment case. Short-Term Pressure: Raising Liquidity Rather Than a Safe Haven During the recent geopolitical crises in the Middle East and amid rising oil prices, gold behaved less like a traditional safe haven and, at times, moved in tandem with the stock market. In an environment marked by inflation concerns and falling stock markets, investors primarily used the precious metal as a highly liquid hedge. To quickly generate cash during tense market phases or to meet impending margin calls on other investments, gold positions were aggressively sold off. This development was accompanied by previously massively overextended positioning in the futures market. Driven in part by inexperienced speculators, a noticeable correction followed the rapid surge to around $5,400 per ounce at the end of January, as these often leveraged positions had to be hastily unwound. Also noteworthy for commodity investors is the profoundly altered market dynamic: The historical correlation between gold and oil, which was still strongly positive in the 1970s and 1980s, has since decoupled dramatically. Today, this correlation has weakened to a value of around 0.15 or even into negative territory, posing entirely new challenges for diversification in modern portfolios. Structural demand from Asia and ETF inflows provide support The gold price owes its solid foundation to the ongoing need for diversification among institutional investors. Global de-dollarization and geopolitical uncertainties, along with steady ETF inflows, are driving demand, particularly in Asia. On the Shanghai Gold Exchange, this is reflected in a significant price premium of around 20 U.S. dollars. The focus here is less on jewelry or coins and more on large-format bars for the institutional sector. Regulatory changes in China and India now allow large local insurers and asset managers to strategically build up gold positions. This robust demand is complemented by steady purchases by central banks, as underscored by the People’s Bank of China ’s recent acquisitions of an additional 8.1 metric tons. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-price-forecast-for-2026-why-the-precious-metal-holds-huge-potential-despite-headwinds

Published: Jul 04, 2026 - 2:01 AM (Kitco News) – Even as U.S. Treasury yields and a stronger dollar continue to limit gold’s upside, growing diversification demand, central bank buying and ETF inflows should support further price gains for the yellow metal by the end of 2026, according to HSBC. "Gold did not rally during the Middle East conflict and has largely moved in tandem with equities,” HSBC Global Chief Investment Officer Willem Sels and Global Head of Wealth Insights Lucia Ku wrote. “Our analysis indicates that US yields are the primary driver of gold prices. We believe gold may remain range-bound in the near term amid elevated real yields and a stronger USD. However, demand for portfolio diversification, central bank buying and steady ETF inflows should support gold prices over the medium term.” “We continue to view gold as an effective diversifier against broader portfolio risks." Sels and Ku said their analysis indicates that U.S. Treasury yields are currently acting as the primary driver of gold’s price action. “When yields rise, the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset increases, putting pressure on gold prices,” they said. “Moreover, gold has been less effective as an equity hedge in 2026, having largely moved in tandem with equities.” HSBC believes gold will likely remain rangebound in the near term in the face of elevated real yields and a strong U.S. dollar. “However, demand for portfolio diversification, central bank purchases and steady ETF inflows continue to support our bullish view on gold and its role as a diversifier against broader portfolio risks,” they said. “We anticipate further upside for gold by year-end." On May 11, James Steel, Chief Precious Metals Analyst at HSBC, said that gold has performed exactly as it should throughout the Iran conflict . “The demand has been good out of China,” Steel said. “The Shanghai Gold Exchange premium – the difference between the domestic price in China and the global price – is around $20, indicating strong domestic demand in China, which is mostly on the institutional side. It's interesting; it's less on jewelry and coins and small bars, which we have seen traditionally, and more on the large bars, more for institutions, because we had some regulatory reform in both China and India. Now the top insurance companies in China are allowed to accumulate bullion, and asset managers in India are allowed to accumulate it as well.” “But in addition to that, we saw surprisingly strong buying in the latest data from the central bank, from the People's Bank of China, who bought 8.1 tonnes for the last month's data.” Steel was asked what he learned from gold’s peak around $5,400 per ounce in late January, and its subsequent decline amid the Middle East conflict. “Well, I think the run up was a little robust,” he said. “We were bringing in a lot of money that had not been in the market for quite some time, or had not traded gold at all. One could argue that the market had become overly long, particularly when you look at CFTC data and other things we have available now.” “There's been a lot of critics of the bullion market saying that the decline since the strikes on Iran and escalating oil prices, [claiming] that gold is not a safe haven, that it’s failed in some sense,” Steel said. “I would argue exactly the opposite, because as the oil went up and we got restoked inflationary fears, and bond yields rose, and the dollar rose, equities declined. In that atmosphere, ready cash was needed. And that's what gold provides you.” “We did see liquidation in the gold market, but mostly as a reaction to the financial market,” he added. “In a sense, gold was an insurance policy, and that insurance policy was being cashed in.” Steel was also questioned on his views of gold’s historical relationship with oil prices. “Well, that's interesting, because I'm old enough to remember when it was a positive relationship,” he replied. “We've done some work on this. In the 1970s, gold was positively correlated with oil: Oil ran up, and so did gold. In the 1980s, that was the same; oil fell and gold also fell.” “Now, that correlation seemed to break apart as we got into the 90s, as oil was a less significant part of the global economy,” he said. “That correlation is now only about 0.15, or even negative at times… It's negative at the moment.” Finally, Steel was asked whether he views gold as one of several alternative assets within investor portfolios, or whether he sees it as a standalone asset. “Well, I think you could argue that it is an alternative asset,” he said. “It’s certainly quite unique, in the sense that it's a hard asset and it's also highly liquid. It doesn't correlate to Apple or Nvidia, it tends not to, over the long run anyway. Things like Canadian farmland, for instance, that's also a hard asset, but you can't liquidate it quickly. And that's the beauty of gold. It's both a hard asset, and it's highly liquid, highly traded.” “But what you have touched on, and I think we will see it back again, is many asset managers who never before have included gold in their portfolio, are beginning to do that, because they're looking for alternatives.” And on April 2, Sels and Ku said that despite gold’s recent underperformance, the rise of cross-asset correlations makes the yellow metal more valuable than ever as a portfolio diversifier, and they remain bullish on gold’s long-term outlook . Sels and Ku reiterated their constructive outlook on gold over the next six months, and said the bank is maintaining its Overweight positioning. "Inflation concerns have also led to rate volatility and a repricing of monetary policy expectations,” they noted. “Policymakers are likely to maintain current interest rates for some time before easing later. We continue to seek quality yields from investment-grade credit and EM local currency bonds for income generation.” “However, as cross-asset correlations have increased, we use gold and alternative assets to enhance diversification,” Sels and Lu underlined. “Despite the recent pullback, we remain bullish on gold over the medium to long term due to its diversification benefits and safe-haven demand.” The analysts added that they still expect gold’s recent headwinds to be short-lived, as the underlying fundamentals remain supportive. “Gold continues to serve as a compelling portfolio diversifier amid geopolitical uncertainty and central bank buying,” they wrote. HSBC has held fast to their positive outlook for the yellow metal throughout the recent pullback. On March 30, analysts at HSBC Asset Management said gold is behaving more like a risk asset in 2026, selling off sharply amid heightened geopolitical tensions and a stronger dollar, but the de-dollarization trend still makes it a good long-term investment . "Moves in the gold price since the Iran conflict broke out have defied expectations,” the analysts wrote. “The conventional playbook assumed that mounting geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty would naturally boost the yellow metal, mirroring last year’s ‘Liberation Day’ episode and sustaining a spectacular two-year rally.” Instead, the yellow metal has done the opposite, they noted, losing 15% to date in March. “A stronger US dollar has certainly been a headwind, deterring non-US buyers, while a hawkish repricing of interest rates has increased the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset,” the analysts said. “Yet, gold withstood a similar surge in the greenback and rates throughout 2022, weakening this traditional thesis.” HSBC believes gold is actually behaving like a risk asset in 2026. “Ownership has shifted towards retail and other leveraged buyers, many of whom are forced to liquidate holdings in periods of market stress,” they noted. "There remains a decent long-term investment case for gold, particularly amid ongoing global de-dollarisation,” the analysts said. “However, the recent volatility offers a stark reminder: robust portfolio diversification demands a broad-based approach." Source： https://www.kitco.com/news/article/2026-07-03/we-anticipate-further-upside-gold-year-end-hsbcs-sels-and-ku

June 17, 2026 Despite a sharp 26 percent drop in prices during the Iran conflict, Barclays believes the long-term upward trend for gold remains intact. The British bank attributes the recent slump to temporary market forces, while structural price drivers such as inflation and central bank purchases persist. Temporary Factors Overshadow Safe-Haven Role Between January and June, gold lost massive value—an unusual pattern, as geopolitical crises typically boost demand for safe havens. According to Barclays’ Cross-Asset Research Team, however, this role was overshadowed by massive macroeconomic headwinds. A strong U.S. dollar and rising real interest rates weighed heavily on the precious metal, as the market quickly priced out the Federal Reserve’s previously anticipated interest rate cuts. At the same time, the rally in the stock markets—fueled by a roughly 10 percent rise in the S&P 500—tied up considerable risk capital. According to Barclays, however, these factors explain only part of the price decline. The greatest downward momentum stemmed from the massive unwinding of leveraged gold positions, which was further accelerated by simultaneous sales by the Russian and Turkish central banks . Investors were driven by higher yields, causing short-term capital flows to dictate prices. Structural Drivers Justify Premium Analysts, however, view these headwinds as temporary. With the foreseeable easing of tensions in the Middle East, fundamental price drivers are likely to regain the upper hand. These include persistent inflationary pressure, monetary policy uncertainties, and the continued diversification of government currency reserves. Barclays quantifies this effect clearly: historically, every additional percentage point of inflation increases the price of gold by about five percent. The bank currently estimates the fair value of the precious metal at $4,150 per ounce and anticipates a reversal in the near future. This is contingent on the U.S. dollar resuming its long-term downward trend and central banks returning to sustained gold purchases. Forecast Confirmed: Winners in the Mining Sector Accordingly, Barclays is sticking to its ambitious price targets: The bank expects the gold price to reach $4,791 per ounce by 2026, rising to $4,900 by the end of 2027. However, the bank does not rule out short-term price fluctuations until the trend ultimately reverses. According to analysts’ estimates, established gold producers such as Endeavour, Hochschild, Fresnillo, Newmont, and Agnico Eagle are likely to benefit most from this bullish scenario. The key question for the sector now is whether the expected recovery in the gold price will quickly translate into higher profit margins. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-price-analysts-expect-a-rebound-to-nearly-usd4-800

[SMM Insights] China's Steel Export Landscape to Middle East Reshaped: Finished Products Stall while Billets Stand Out Looking back at 2025, the Middle East market was undoubtedly the most dazzling "emerging dynamic market" in China's overseas steel landscape. In 2025, China's total steel exports to the Middle East reached 15.81 million mt, with monthly shipments basically stable in the high range of 1.2–1.3 million mt. Against the backdrop of total annual steel exports of 134 million mt, up 14% YoY, the Middle East market accounted for 11%–12% of China's total overseas steel export share. This means that in a single geo-economic region, its share and strategic reliance were second only to Southeast Asia, serving as the "second largest core pillar" for China's steel going global. In terms of product mix, high-added-value HRC (29% share), steel pipes essential for oil and gas projects (18% share), and medium-thickness plates (14% share) formed the three dominant players, reflecting the region's strong diversified industrial and infrastructure throughput capacity. However, it was precisely due to such a massive trade base in 2025 and high reliance on conventional Persian Gulf shipping lanes that when geopolitical storms suddenly struck and straits were dramatically blocked, the resulting "broad market stall" and supply chain disruption were so severe. Below, we will analyze in order: the specific situation of China's steel exports to the Middle East, how cargo pressure was shifted through port replacements during the strait blockade, and how the export landscape will be reshaped after the latest US-Israel negotiations? The "Stall" and Structural Anomaly of China's Steel Exports to the Middle East Data Source: SMM, China's General Administration of Customs First, let's look at total export performance. According to SMM historical data and the latest customs export trends, China's total steel exports to the Middle East in the first four months of 2026 plummeted from 5.47 million mt in the same period of 2025 to 3.57 million mt, with April exports directly halving. Specifically, among China's 5.47 million mt of steel exports to the Middle East from January to April 2025, a highly advanced finished-product-oriented export characteristic was evident. HRC (29%), steel pipe (18%), coated steel (15%), and medium-thickness plates (14%) constituted the four mainstays of China’s steel trade. In terms of destination countries, Saudi Arabia’s rigid demand for offshore/oil & gas pipe (986,000 mt) and the UAE’s strong processing throughput of general HRC (1.607 million mt) and medium-thickness plates (779,000 mt) jointly established the traditional “dual-core consumption hinterland” within the Persian Gulf. Data source: SMM, General Administration of Customs of China Supply Shock and Physical Scissors Gap: The “Billet Export Bonanza” Under a Double Squeeze Since the start of 2026, the blockade of the Persian Gulf Strait caused by geopolitical conflicts significantly weakened overall shipments, while a dramatic “underlying mutation” simultaneously unfolded in the product mix. Steel billet, a minor product that previously accounted for only an 8% share (431,000 mt), registered a strong countertrend increase of 24% in the first four months of 2026. According to the SMM survey, the underlying driver of this anomaly originated from a localized supply shock induced by geopolitical shifts in Iran. If the closure of the Persian Gulf Strait severed the “aorta” of Middle Eastern steel imports, the sudden destruction of Iran’s two largest steel giants—Mobarakeh Steel Company (MSC) in Isfahan and Khuzestan Steel Company (KSC)—on March 27, 2026, completely ignited a “raw material upheaval” within the region. Iran is the world’s tenth-largest and the Middle East’s largest crude steel producer (accounting for over 50% of the region’s total crude steel output), with annual steel exports exceeding 10 million mt, among which semi-finished steel billets are the absolute mainstay. Mobarakeh (MSC) has an annual capacity of 11.8 million mt (20% of Iran’s total capacity), making it the undisputed “King of Flat Products/Sheets & Plates” in the Middle East; Khuzestan (KSC) is Iran’s second-largest steel producer and its most critical production base for slabs and billets. Data source: SMM, General Administration of Customs of China Under normal conditions, Iran was the primary supplier of low-priced steel billets to local rolling mills in the Middle East. With the sharp contraction in Iran's external supply, rolling mills in the Middle East, particularly in Oman and parts of the UAE outside the Gulf that were not directly affected by the blockade, faced severe raw material supply disruption risks. To maintain production, local buyers quickly released a large number of urgent inquiries to the international market. According to SMM survey, the huge demand gap for steel billets created by Iran's exit was filled and shared by supplies from China, India, and Russia. Because the local shortage was mainly crude steel raw material for rolling sheets and plates, and the equipment destruction from explosions meant that rolling lines were the first to restart, the main incremental product in these counter-trend orders was steel slab. This situation shares similarities with the article at https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bsrZaRRSRDHC_FmGLulJOQ (Middle East turmoil triggers "mismatch", China accelerates filling a supply vacuum of about 2.3 million mt in Southeast Asia), which mentioned that China would accelerate taking over steel billet supply gaps. That is, despite the decline in steel exports this year, billet exports also achieved counter-trend growth. Stock Game: The "X-Shaped Crossover" of Inside-Gulf Shutdowns and Outside-Gulf Safe Havens Verified by SMM through freight forwarders, steel trade (especially medium-thickness plates, pipes, and steel billets) relies heavily on bulk or breakbulk vessels. When container liners encounter blockades, they can easily reroute by amending bookings via computer systems, but the diversion of bulk carriers faces rigid constraints from destination port drafts, specialized handling equipment (such as large quay cranes), and inland truck connections. Therefore, over the past two months, the supply chain staged a dramatic "port drift" inside and outside the Persian Gulf. The following uses SMM's panoramic shipping data to explain in detail the changes in cargo flow between ports. Under normal conditions, over 70% of China's steel shipments to the Middle East converged densely on Jebel Ali Port inside the Persian Gulf and Dammam Port on the eastern coast of Saudi Arabia. But after the strait blockade, steel port arrivals at these two traditional hubs showed a historic "physical shock" in SMM's high-frequency shipping data (falling to zero from April to May). Meanwhile, the diverted cargo, fighting to survive, surged wildly toward alternative ports outside the strait, tearing open a "lifeline of safety" spatially: ① "Overload Surge" at Oman's Port of Sohar: As the most critical cross-border multimodal transshipment hub outside the Gulf, its port arrivals in April surged nearly fivefold MoM. Large batches of Chinese HRC and steel billet originally destined for the inner Gulf were forced ashore here, causing massive congestion at the port in May as cross-border heavy truck capacity collapsed. ② "Western Route Counterflow" at Saudi Arabia's Jeddah Port: Saudi Arabia abandoned its eastern sea route (Dammam Port) nationwide, forcibly redirecting all Chinese orders to Jeddah on the Red Sea side, causing its throughput to surge to a peak of 361,000 mt in April. Source: SMM, Google Maps However, it should be noted that while cargo can be transferred via other ports in the short term, port arrivals in May have already shown a weakening trend again. The reason is that alternative ports outside the Gulf simply cannot handle such massive and concentrated cargo volumes, leading to extremely severe congestion. According to SMM's survey, because navigation within the Gulf is no longer possible, some shipping lines originally bound for Jebel Ali had to divert to Fujairah, but are still queuing for berths. Jeddah Port faces similar issues. With tight capacity, prices keep surging, and transportation faces severe obstacles. Source: SMM Outlook for Change: With the US-Iran blockade-lifting deal, what impact will the shipping supply chain face? After 108 days of the "dual blockade" (Iran's blockade of the strait and the US's counter-blockade of Iranian ports) that gripped the lifeline of global energy and commodities, the US and Iran officially issued successive high-profile statements announcing a ceasefire memorandum of understanding. The relevant timeline is summarized below. Data source: Compiled by SMM from public channels The news, once released, triggered a strong market reaction. On one hand, there are expectations for export increments from shipping recovery; on the other hand, there are certain demand expectations for post-disaster reconstruction. According to the latest SMM survey, most exporters have not responded enthusiastically to the lifting of the blockade and remain skeptical about its actual implementation. Therefore, from the perspective of actual order-taking, shipments to the Middle East still need 3 to 4 weeks to be verified. If a full lifting is confirmed, the "demand backlog" caused by the earlier shipping disruptions will see a concentrated release. Based on past customs data and the local supply-demand balance table, SMM roughly predicts that finished steel products will experience strong growth expectations, potentially filling a disaster-induced gap of approximately 1.7-2.1 million mt. Among them, HRC accounts for the highest proportion (29%) of China's finished steel exports to the Middle East. Although the Middle East's largest flat steel giant, Iran's Mobarakeh Steel Company (MSC), has reported production resumptions for its blast furnace previously damaged by war, its capacity is in a post-disaster repair phase and is not expected to fill the local gap in the short term. However, recent market rumors suggest that Indian resources are seizing the Middle Eastern market at lower prices, which will also pose some impact on China's export order-taking. However, for semi-finished products, the reason Chinese steel billets have been "hot" in recent months is the supply gap caused by the strait blockade and the bombing of Iranian steel mills. Once Iran's logistics fully recover, Chinese steel billets will lose their advantage in absolute price, logistics distance, and surrounding multilateral competition, and the demand gap in Southeast Asia previously filled by substituting Iranian sources may also be reclaimed. Recently, according to SMM surveys, billet resources are already circulating in the Middle Eastern market. Through the following comparison of comprehensive landed costs (CFR) for billets in the Middle East, it can be clearly seen that Chinese resources are under comprehensive pressure: Source: SMM Therefore, steel billet exports to the Middle East are expected to be somewhat limited, with competition only possible at lower prices. Preliminary forecasts indicate a pressure reduction of 50,000–250,000 mt. However, we need to broaden our perspective to the global multilateral trade context, and we must not fall into excessive pessimism due to localized marginal reductions. Although the billets exported to the Middle East are under pressure, the incremental steel billet volumes that previously replaced Iranian exports to Southeast Asia may not necessarily be wiped out. Given the uncertainty of the Middle East situation and based on considerations of a more stable supply chain, Southeast Asian buyers may continue to source from Chinese suppliers. Therefore, against the backdrop of an overall steel recovery and resilience in steel billet prices, SMM maintains its earlier view, holding a moderately optimistic stance on annual steel exports, with expectations of "steady incremental growth." Finally, it needs to be added that, currently, due to severe port congestion, even if the strait is confirmed passable, it will still take a long time for actual cargo to arrive and cannot immediately be reflected in the data. At the same time, ocean freight rates will also maintain high-level fluctuations in the short term due to unfavorable port cargo pick-up. SMM will continue to track subsequent developments... Copyright and Intellectual Property Statement: This report is independently created or compiled by SMM Information & Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "SMM"), and SMM legally enjoys complete copyright and related intellectual property rights. The copyright, trademark rights, domain name rights, commercial data information property rights, and other related intellectual property rights of all content contained in this report (including but not limited to information, articles, data, charts, pictures, audio, video, logos, advertisements, trademarks, trade names, domain names, layout designs, etc.) are owned or held by SMM or its related right holders. The above rights are strictly protected by relevant laws and regulations of the People's Republic of China, such as the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China, the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, as well as applicable international treaties. Without prior written authorization from SMM, no institution or individual may: 1. Use all or part of this report in any form (including but not limited to reprinting, modifying, selling, transferring, displaying, translating, compiling, disseminating); 2. Disclose the content of this report to any third party; 3. License or authorize any third party to use the content of this report; 4. For any unauthorized use, SMM will legally pursue the legal responsibilities of the infringer, demanding that they bear legal responsibilities including but not limited to contractual breach liability, returning unjust enrichment, and compensating for direct and indirect economic losses. Data Source Statement: (Except for publicly available information, other data in this report are derived from publicly available information (including but not limited to industry news, seminars, exhibitions, corporate financial reports, brokerage reports, data from the National Bureau of Statistics, customs import and export data, various data published by major associations and institutions, etc.), market exchanges, and comprehensive analysis and reasonable inferences made by the research team based on SMM's internal database models. This information is for reference only and does not constitute decision-making advice. SMM reserves the final interpretation right of the terms in this statement and the right to adjust and modify the content of the statement according to actual circumstances.