![Aluminum Semis Export Profits Continued to Rise, Recovering to Pre-Rebate-Cancellation Levels [SMM Analysis]](https://imgqn.smm.cn/usercenter/JnyfJ20251217171654.jpg)
In Q1 2026, China’s aluminum semis exports showed a pronounced pattern of product-category divergence amid the interplay of three factors: the long-term impact of the cancellation of export tax rebates in December 2024, the divergence in demand structures outside China, and the sudden outbreak of geopolitical conflict in the Strait of Hormuz.....
Mar 31, 2026 23:33According to market sources, the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) concludes its first definitive quarter today with multiple unresolved administrative hurdles. The EU Commission is set to announce the initial CBAM certificate price on April 7, yet country-specific default values remain flawed, hindering reliable cost calculations. Furthermore, the tender for the central trading platform has faced delays, and a backlog of nearly 10,000 companies awaits registration. The system's viability is further challenged by a severe lack of certified emissions validation bodies and looming changes to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) benchmarks, which directly dictate CBAM pricing structures and future allocations.
Mar 31, 2026 19:38Markets frequently mistake an industry's sudden breakout for its origin. China's long-duration energy storage (LDES, ≥4 hours) sector did not abruptly emerge in 2026. Following policy incubation (2023-2024) and initial scaling (2025), 2026 marks a definitive inflection point, driven by a validated, closed-loop business model and exponential growth in grid-connected capacity.
Mar 31, 2026 18:28On March 31, 2026, Zenith Steel released its pricing policy for early April I. Price Adjustment for the Three Ten-Day Periods of March: 1. Wire rod: 235 2. Rebar: 155 II. Provisional Prices for the First Ten-Day Period of April: 1. Wire rod: 3,700 2. Rebar: 3,400 III. The benchmark monthly discount rate for bank acceptance bills was adjusted to 1.2‰ [SMM Steel]
Mar 31, 2026 17:58Today, SMM's spot battery-grade lithium carbonate price fluctuated downward from the previous working day, while the most-traded futures contract also moved lower. After the opening, the price once climbed above 170,000 yuan/mt, then fluctuated downward all the way and finally closed at 157,000 yuan/mt.
Mar 31, 2026 16:56[Supply Tightening Coupled With Macro Tailwinds Keeps Aluminum Prices Firmly at High Levels] Overall, the geopolitical situation in the Middle East remains the core factor affecting the global aluminum market. A series of production cuts and damage incidents at Middle Eastern aluminum plants is expected to provide strong upward momentum for aluminum prices in and outside China, together with support from expectations of gradually releasing peak-season demand in China. In the short term, aluminum prices are expected to remain in a high-level consolidation pattern.
Mar 31, 2026 09:12[SMM Tin Morning Briefing: The Most-Traded SHFE Tin Contract Opened Slightly Higher in the Night Session and Then Fluctuated Lower, While Trading in the Spot Market Was Relatively Weak]
Mar 31, 2026 08:57Indonesian Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) Bahlil Lahadalia clarified that the pricing of non-subsidized fuels, such as high-octane RON 95 and 98 used by industries and upper-income groups, fluctuates according to global market trends as outlined in the 2022 ESDM regulations. Addressing rumors of a 10% price increase for non-subsidized fuels starting April 1, 2026, Bahlil emphasized that these adjustments follow market mechanisms and do not burden state finances or require official public announcements. Meanwhile, he assured that any decisions regarding subsidized fuels remain under the direct authority of President Prabowo Subianto, who continues to prioritize public purchasing power and social conditions.
Mar 30, 2026 23:42In recent years, the most common and straightforward framework for assessing demand across the lithium battery value chain has been to anchor it to EV sales. The logic was simple: the more vehicles sold, the stronger the battery demand; conversely, a slowdown in vehicle sales would imply weaker battery demand. This relationship held true in the early stages of the industry, when EV penetration was rapidly increasing, product structures were relatively simple, and battery demand exhibited a strong linear correlation with vehicle sales. However, this linear relationship is now clearly weakening. Increasing evidence suggests that battery demand is no longer solely determined by vehicle sales , but is increasingly driven by multiple factors, including average battery capacity per vehicle, product mix, commercial vehicle electrification, and export dynamics. 1. The “Vehicle Sales = Battery Demand” Formula Is Breaking Down At its core, vehicle sales represent the number of units sold, while battery demand reflects total energy consumption, i.e., total installed battery capacity. These two metrics only move in tandem when the average battery capacity per vehicle remains stable. Once average battery size increases, or when the sales mix shifts across BEV vs. PHEV, passenger vs. commercial vehicles, the direct linkage between vehicle sales and battery demand begins to decouple. As a result, assessing battery demand today requires answering several additional questions beyond headline vehicle sales: What is the average battery capacity per vehicle? Which vehicle segments are driving incremental growth? Are export flows and regional differences amplifying demand volatility? In other words, the industry is transitioning from a “unit-driven” model to an “energy-driven” model . 2. Rising Battery Capacity per Vehicle: The Primary Driver The most direct reason for the decoupling is the continuous increase in battery capacity per vehicle. This trend is driven by three key factors. First, vehicle upsizing. Both in China and overseas, EV consumption is shifting from basic electrification to enhanced user experience. The rising share of SUVs, pickup trucks, larger sedans, and premium vehicles naturally drives higher battery capacity per vehicle. Larger vehicle size, longer range requirements, and higher performance expectations all translate into higher kWh configurations. Second, the range competition is not over. While the industry has moved beyond the most aggressive phase of “range-at-all-costs,” consumers still place strong emphasis on real-world range, low-temperature performance, highway efficiency, and charging convenience. Even amid intense price competition, automakers are reluctant to reduce battery capacity, as it remains a core determinant of product competitiveness. Third, the growth of premium BEVs and heavy-duty applications. Although EV sales growth is expected to moderate going forward, battery demand is still projected to grow at a faster pace, with increasing battery capacity per vehicle being a key contributor. This reflects a critical shift: vehicles may not be selling faster, but each vehicle is consuming more battery capacity. Therefore, relying solely on slowing vehicle sales growth to infer weaker battery demand may significantly underestimate the offsetting effect from rising battery capacity per vehicle. 3. Product Mix Matters More Than Total Sales Volume Beyond battery capacity, changes in product mix are also reshaping battery demand. For instance, selling one million EVs with a higher BEV share will result in stronger battery demand than the same volume with a higher PHEV share, due to differences in battery size. In other words, shifts between different powertrain technologies directly impact overall battery intensity. Globally, this structural divergence is becoming more pronounced. In Europe, policy adjustments have led to a temporary rebound in PHEVs, which dilutes average battery capacity per vehicle. In contrast, China continues to maintain a high share of BEVs and higher-capacity vehicles, supporting stronger battery demand intensity. Thus, evaluating battery demand today requires understanding not just how many vehicles are sold, but what types of vehicles are driving the growth . 4. Commercial Vehicle Electrification: The Most Undervalued Growth Driver If rising battery capacity per vehicle represents the first layer of demand restructuring, then the electrification of commercial vehicles represents the second—and arguably the most underestimated—layer. Passenger EVs typically carry battery packs in the range of tens of kWh, whereas electric heavy-duty trucks, construction vehicles, and specialty vehicles often require 300–600 kWh or more. This means that a single electric truck can generate battery demand equivalent to multiple passenger EVs . Even with a smaller sales base, incremental penetration in commercial vehicles can significantly amplify overall battery demand. Rising oil prices further accelerate this trend by improving the total cost of ownership (TCO) of electric commercial vehicles, particularly in high-utilization, heavy-load, and fixed-route applications. In such scenarios, electrification becomes economically compelling much faster. As a result, while commercial vehicles are not the largest segment by volume, they are likely to become one of the most powerful “energy leverage” drivers of battery demand in the near term. 5. Exports, Inventory Cycles, and Production Scheduling Are Increasing the Mismatch In addition to end-market dynamics, midstream factors such as exports, inventory cycles, and production scheduling are further widening the gap between vehicle sales and battery demand. On one hand, changes in export policies, overseas customer stocking behavior, and shifts in trade flows can either front-load or delay battery and materials production. On the other hand, inventory cycles are once again becoming a central analytical framework. Automakers and distributors are no longer maintaining stable inventory levels; instead, they dynamically adjust stocking based on sales trends and pricing competition. This means that battery production is increasingly influenced by inventory drawdowns, restocking cycles, and order visibility—rather than simply mirroring real-time vehicle sales. Analyst SMM Lithium Battery Analyst Lesley Yang yangle@smm.cn
Mar 30, 2026 18:05India’s steel market in 2026 is expected to remain balanced, with demand slightly outpacing supply. Domestic consumption will absorb most output, while imports decline overall and exports increase modestly as a balancing mechanism. Supported by strong growth and infrastructure investment, India is transitioning toward a demand-led steel market with solid long-term potential.
Mar 30, 2026 15:19