I. Import & Export Data: Volumes Are Rising According to customs data, China imported 4,400 tonnes of lithium hydroxide in June 2026, up 12% month-on-month and nearly triple year-on-year. Of this, 1,159 tonnes came from South Korea, accounting for 26% of the month's total imports; Chile ranked second with 993 tonnes; while imports from Indonesia remained low, with 774 tonnes arriving in June. On the export front, China exported 6,018 tonnes of lithium hydroxide in June, up 70% month-on-month, driven primarily by quarter-end shipment concentration and a modest recovery in overseas demand. Of this, 5,032 tonnes were exported to South Korea and 679 tonnes to Japan. Since 2026, China has shifted from a net exporter to a net importer of lithium hydroxide. Cumulative data shows that total imports for January–June reached 31,700 tonnes, a nearly threefold increase from the 8,000 tonnes imported during the same period last year, reflecting a certain degree of resilience in domestic demand. The surge in imports is now an established fact. Behind it lie both the cyclical advantage of domestic demand and prices over overseas markets, as well as traders' strategic moves to establish a foothold ahead of potential exchange listings. Yet regardless of the driving factors, a more practical question emerges — with import volumes climbing to record highs, can importers sustain profitability? Below, we assess the profit margins of imported lithium hydroxide through two pathways: direct resale and carbonation processing. II. Profitability of Direct Resale of Imported Lithium Hydroxide The following profit calculations are based on a comparison between the imported CIF cost (including tariffs, VAT, and port & agency fees) and the domestic SMM battery-grade lithium hydroxide spot price. A phased breakdown is provided below. January–May (First Half) : Import profits were generally substantial, with margins reaching as high as RMB 25,000/tonne or more. During this period, domestic lithium hydroxide prices were on an upward trajectory, while overseas demand remained sluggish and price increases lagged noticeably. Coupled with high overseas inventory levels, foreign holders showed a strong willingness to offload amid the elevated domestic prices, offering certain discounts on actual transactions, which allowed domestic buyers to enjoy margins better than theoretical estimates. June–July : Profitability narrowed significantly. By mid-to-late July, even imports from zero-tariff sources such as South Korea and Australia were hovering around the breakeven point. During this phase, domestic lithium hydroxide prices entered a downward channel, while overseas price declines lagged behind in tandem. At the same time, overseas demand picked up modestly, and holders — having largely cleared their earlier inventories — turned more reluctant to release cargoes, with widespread stockpiling behavior. As a result, the price drop overseas did not keep pace with the decline in China, compressing import margins further toward breakeven. It should also be noted that the above margin calculations implicitly rely on a key assumption: that imported lithium hydroxide can clear customs within a short storage timeframe and be sold at the SMM battery-grade lithium hydroxide (coarse particle) spot price. In practice, however, this assumption may not hold across all scenarios. The realities facing traders when importing lithium hydroxide into the Chinese market are twofold. On the one hand, major domestic cathode material manufacturers have long-standing relationships with leading domestic brands, with well-established supplier qualification systems and process parameters — replacing an imported brand requires a lengthy requalification cycle and faces limited downstream acceptance. On the other hand, lithium hydroxide from different source countries varies in particle size distribution, magnetic material content, and impurity profiles, making it not a straightforward "drop-in" substitute. These factors mean that imported lithium hydroxide often struggles to transact directly at domestic hydroxide spot prices in practice. Instead, it must be sold at a discount — either through an outright price reduction or by pricing reference to the main carbonate futures contract. This implies that actual profits are not as generous as the apparent figures would suggest. III. Profitability of Carbonation Processing of Imported Lithium Hydroxide Core assumptions are as follows: imported material is purchased at a 94%–98% discount to the SMM battery-grade lithium hydroxide spot price, and the carbonation process recovery rate is estimated at 95%–98%. Under these conditions, after the imported lithium hydroxide is carbonated into lithium carbonate, profitable opportunities emerge only in isolated months, with overall margins remaining fairly narrow. Summary Import volumes are growing, and for most of the first half of the year profitable import windows were available (notably in March and May). However, from June onward, apparent profits have narrowed rapidly toward the breakeven point. When further factoring in the discount required for direct resale or the margin compression from carbonation processing, the actual profitability of lithium hydroxide imports in recent months becomes even more limited. For importers aiming to sustain profitability in this space going forward, relying on simple price arbitrage will no longer suffice. Instead, competitive advantages must be built through downstream channel partnerships, quality premiums, and exchange rate risk management. Note: The import margin calculations in this report are based on a specific CIF benchmark. Actual transaction prices may vary by source country, brand, and purchase volume, while discount levels and carbonation costs are market-based estimates and are provided for reference purposes only. Data source: SMM & China Customs

July 31, 2026 - This week, ferrochrome market trading was stagnant and prices fell; the chrome ore market was sluggish, with limited inquiries......

[SMM Molybdenum Analysis: Supply-side supported a strong molybdenum market in July; supply-demand support logic persists in August] SMM July 31 report: In July, China’s molybdenum market maintained a pattern of strong concentrates and weak ferro-molybdenum, with the overall market consolidating at highs. Industry chain profits continued to concentrate upstream. In July, China’s molybdenum concentrates market faced many supply disruptions in China and overseas. Coupled with downstream ferro-molybdenum steel tender volumes strengthening both YoY and MoM, and robust demand, these bullish supply-demand fundamentals drove prices of molybdenum concentrates and ferro-molybdenum to repeatedly hit three-year highs, challenging previous highs.

[SMM Aluminum Downstream Analysis: July Aluminum Processing PMI at 42.2%, All Segments Enter Contraction Territory; End-Use Demand Weakens, Export Divergence Hinders Near-Term Recovery] In July, the aluminum processing industry exhibited a pattern of broad-based off-season weakness across all segments with structural divergence. Only the new energy sector demonstrated demand resilience, while domestic demand in other sectors contracted broadly and significantly. Export performance was uneven, with aluminum wire and cable exports plummeting and dragging down the industry. Combined with raw material constraints, high-temperature production restrictions, and disturbances from price spread recovery, overall industry activity remains deeply mired in contraction territory, and near-term recovery momentum is insufficient.

As of July 28, LME zinc inventories (including off-warrant stocks) had fallen to 119,600 mt, down by approximately 45,000 mt from mid-June. As overseas inventories continued to decline, the LME zinc market structure shifted from contango to backwardation, with the backwardation widening further. By July 28, the LME zinc cash-to-3M spread had strengthened to US$61.09/mt.

[Zinc Ingot Export Window Opening? A Nearly 20-Year Rare Opportunity Reemerges!] As of July 28, LME zinc inventory (including non-registered warrants) had pulled back to 101,800 mt, down about 20,000 mt from mid-June. Amid continued destocking outside China, the LME zinc market structure shifted from contango to backwardation, and the backwardation structure kept widening. On July 28, the LME zinc Cash-3M spread strengthened to $61.09/mt. In stark contrast, zinc consumption in China remained in the traditional off-season, with SMM-reported social inventory of zinc ingots across seven domestic markets holding steady at a high level of around 260,000 mt. The supply-demand patterns in China and overseas clearly diverged, and the SHFE/LME zinc price ratio weakened all the way. Against this backdrop, the long-dormant export window for Chinese zinc ingots reappeared, and discussions in the market about reverse arbitrage involving "buying SHFE zinc, selling LME zinc" noticeably heated up...

On July 29, the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CNIA) held a press conference on the H1 2026 performance of the nonferrous metals industry, both in-person and online. Chen Xuesen, Standing Committee Member of the Party Committee, Vice President and Spokesperson of CNIA, reported on the industry's H1 performance and answered questions from media and enterprise representatives together with relevant department heads. Chen Xuesen stated that the industry's overall operation was stable and improving, with growth in multiple core indicators including production, investment, foreign trade, prices, and profitability. First, production of major varieties grew steadily, while new energy metals diverged. Data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) showed that total production of ten nonferrous metals in H1 reached 41.513 million mt, up 3.3% YoY. Among the 23 nonferrous metal products monitored, production of 13 products increased YoY, while that of 10 products fell YoY. Production and sales of traditional bulk metals were stable with slight gains: copper cathode output was 7.608 million mt (up 5.2%), copper semis 11.982 million mt (up 0.3%), alumina 45.772 million mt (up 3.3%), and primary aluminum 23.187 million mt (up 3.8%). However, upstream mines and downstream processing sectors faced periodic pressure: metal content of six mined metals was 2.955 million mt (down 5.8%) and aluminum semis production was 32.303 million mt (down 2.4%). Industry value-added grew 0.3% in H1, with value-added of the mining and beneficiation sector up 3.2% and that of smelting and processing edging down 0.3%. Production of key new energy metals diverged: silicon metal output was 2.231 million mt (up 2.5% YoY); lithium carbonate capacity release was significant, with production at 563,000 mt (surging 33.9% YoY); refined nickel and refined cobalt output contracted to 221,000 mt and 60,000 mt, down 4.8% and 41.8% YoY respectively. Second, fixed asset investment edged up, with prominent investment vitality in the mining and beneficiation sector. The growth rate of fixed asset investment in the industry narrowed significantly from Q1 in H1. On one hand, project construction progress was constrained by high temperatures and heavy rainfall in some regions; on the other hand, resource constraints became prominent and capacity "involution" intensified, so enterprises had weak willingness for medium and long-term capital expansion domestically and turned more to overseas markets. Overall, the industry's fixed asset investment edged up only 0.4% YoY, down 10.3 percentage points from the Q1 growth rate, with notable sector divergence: investment in nonferrous metals mining and beneficiation rose 21.2%, while investment in smelting and processing declined 4.1%. Private investment was under pressure overall, with industry private investment down 1.0% YoY in H1. By sector, private investment in smelting, rolling and processing fell 3.0%, while that in mine mining and beneficiation grew 8.1%, becoming the main driver of private investment in the industry. Third, foreign trade scale surged significantly, and gold products became the core engine of trade growth. Amid sluggish global economic recovery and intertwined geopolitical turmoil, the industry's foreign trade saw improvements in both volume and quality, with import and export scale expanding substantially. Customs data showed that in H1, total imports and exports of nonferrous metal products reached $347.13 billion, up 68.0% YoY. Specifically, import value was $280.91 billion, up 81.7%, driven mainly by gold products, while export value was $66.22 billion, up 27.3%. The share of gold product imports and exports in the industry's total trade rose to 41.8%, playing a prominent role in boosting overall foreign trade. Bulk raw material imports and exports showed mixed changes. Among them, imports of copper ores and concentrates were 14.61 million mt, down 0.9% YoY, while bauxite imports were 120 million mt, up 17.4%. Imports and exports of copper and aluminum semis showed a pattern of "reduced imports and increased exports." Specifically, imports of unwrought copper and copper semis were 2.49 million mt, down 5.3%, while exports were 879,000 mt, up 18.2%; imports of unwrought aluminum and aluminum semis were 1.88 million mt, down 5.1%, while exports were 3.396 million mt, up 16.3%. In addition, exports of aluminum products (including aluminum alloy wheel hubs) were 2.576 million mt, up 16.4%. Foreign trade in new energy metals continued to gain momentum. Specifically, lithium carbonate imports were 179,000 mt, up 52.3% YoY, silicon metal exports were 379,000 mt, up 11.4%, and unwrought nickel exports contracted sharply to 12,000 mt, down 86.9%. Fourth, market prices consolidated at high levels, with most product prices falling back MoM in June. Affected by overseas resource monopolies and the transmission of geopolitical conflict premiums, major nonferrous metal prices stayed high in H1, but the high prices also forced downstream enterprises to advance material substitution, which to some extent squeezed the industry's demand growth space. In June, market prices saw a phased correction, with 17 of the 24 products monitored by the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CNIA) seeing MoM declines. In terms of H1 average prices, seven products declined YoY, but mainstream products such as copper, aluminum, gold, zinc, tungsten and molybdenum saw price increases. In the domestic spot market in H1, among traditional metals, apart from lead, whose average price was 16,649 yuan/mt, down 1.5% YoY, copper averaged 101,964 yuan/mt, up 31.4%, aluminum averaged 24,124 yuan/mt, up 18.8%, zinc averaged 24,276 yuan/mt, edging up 4.2%, while for precious metals, the average spot gold price was 1,058.4 yuan/g, up 45.9%, and silver averaged 19.7 yuan/g, surging 141.1%. New energy metals showed divergent price changes, with the average price of silicon metal at 9,079 yuan/mt, down 10.7%; battery-grade lithium carbonate at 159,000 yuan/mt, surging 128.1%; nickel at 142,000 yuan/mt, up 12.5%; and cobalt at 417,000 yuan/mt, up 101.5%. Fifth, industry profits increased significantly, with the smelting segment becoming the core pillar of profitability. In H1, the profitability of the industry achieved a leap-forward improvement. The 12,362 enterprises above designated size recorded total operating revenue of 5,769.68 billion yuan, up 21.7% YoY, and total profit of 418.39 billion yuan, up 94.0% YoY. The profit growth accounted for 32.6% of the total profit growth of industrial enterprises above designated size nationwide, boosting the total profit growth of national designated industrial enterprises by 6.1 percentage points, ranking among the top in the industrial sector in terms of profit growth rate. Meanwhile, cost control showed positive results, with the cost per hundred yuan of operating revenue for the above-designated-size enterprises at 90.0 yuan, down 2.7 yuan YoY. The sharp profit increase was driven by multiple favorable factors resonating together: First, tight ore supply and rising scarcity premiums pushed profits toward upstream mines. Second, emerging industries such as AI computing infrastructure, power batteries, energy storage, and NEVs continued to release rigid demand, strongly supporting non-ferrous metal product prices and market demand. Third, geopolitical conflicts periodically pushed up aluminum and sulphuric acid prices, generating phased profit gains; combined with the low price base in H1 2025, these factors jointly drove a sharp YoY increase in profits this year. The profit structure of the industry chain showed a pattern of smelting leading, mining following, and processing being relatively weak. The contribution rates of the mining, smelting, and processing segments to industry profit growth were 23.6%, 65.5%, and 11.0%, respectively, boosting industry profit growth by 22.1, 61.6, and 10.3 percentage points. The profitability difference across the industry chain was significant, with operating profit margins for mining, smelting, and processing standing at 40.6%, 8.9%, and 2.0%, respectively, up 10.3, 3.4, and 0.7 percentage points YoY. The profit increase in the smelting segment was 132.74 billion yuan, accounting for 65.5% of the industry’s profit growth. Aluminum smelting and gold smelting contributed 56.7% and 17.3% of the profit increase in the smelting segment, making them the main drivers of profit growth in the segment. By product, the aluminum sector had the most prominent boosting effect, with a profit growth contribution rate of 43.5%. Dividends from supply-side structural reform in aluminum continued to be released, and global supply tightened due to geopolitical disruptions, pushing aluminum prices persistently higher. The contribution rates of gold, copper, and tungsten & molybdenum were 13.0%, 13.6%, and 9.0%, respectively. Together, these four categories contributed 79% of the industry’s profit growth, becoming the main force behind the profit rise. Profits in only two categories, antimony and silicon metal, were under pressure, while all other metal types achieved positive revenue increases. Chen Xuesen pointed out that since this year, the industry has demonstrated strong development resilience under the dual tests of external risk shocks and internal structural constraints. H1 operations presented three features: support from emerging industry demand, synchronized improvement in industry volume, price, and profit, diversified expansion of overseas resource deployment and continuous improvement of international resource guarantee systems, and prominent domestic resource supply constraints, with primary ores and recycled resources synergistically shoring up weaknesses. Taking all factors into account, the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CNIA) makes the following projections for the industry's 2026 trajectory: H2 nonferrous industry value-added growth rate is expected to be higher than H1, with a full-year industry value-added growth rate of 2%~3%; production of ten nonferrous metals for the full year is up about 3% YoY; major nonferrous metal prices will swing wildly at highs, with geopolitical situations, downstream demand, and overseas supply being the core variables driving price fluctuations; total import and export value will maintain growth for the full year, with import growth being higher, driven by high-price resource procurement and safe-haven demand; exports of copper and aluminum semis and products possess stable resilience, continuing to provide support for stable foreign trade exports; full-year industry operating revenue and total profit remain up YoY, but revenue and profit growth rates will pull back in H2, with the growth rates showing a pattern of stronger first half and weaker second half; the profit allocation pattern remains unchanged, profit advantage at the resource end remains solid, and except for aluminum smelting, the room for profit improvement in other types of smelting and processing is relatively limited. Chen Xuesen stated that in the next step, the industry will closely follow the deployment and requirements of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, focusing on three core tasks: strengthening the resource security baseline, expanding the recycled resource circular industry, accelerating the green and low-carbon transition and proactively addressing international green trade barriers, and cultivating new development momentum and activating enterprise innovation vitality. Multiple measures will be taken to solidify the foundations of the industry chain and supply chain, promoting both quality and efficiency improvements. (China Nonferrous Metals News)

Update: 29 July 2026 June imports climb to 173.34 tons, highest since March 2024, according to customs data International gold price falls 8% in first half, while yuan-denominated price drops 10% China’s gold imports surged 89.1% year-on-year in the first half of 2026 as falling bullion prices, a stronger yuan and sustained demand from investors and commercial banks encouraged overseas purchases. The country imported 864.95 tons of gold between January and June, compared with 457.39 tons in the same period last year, according to figures from China’s General Administration of Customs. China imported 94.16 tons in January, up from 16.52 tons a year earlier. Imports rose to 113.18 tons in February from 76.33 tons and to 161.86 tons in March from 73.67 tons. Purchases stood at 159.84 tons in April, compared with 127.53 tons in the same month last year, before increasing to 162.55 tons in May from 99.55 tons. Imports reached 173.34 tons in June, rising from 63.79 tons a year earlier and marking the third consecutive monthly increase. The June figure was the highest since March 2024. Cheaper international prices and the appreciation of the yuan helped keep Chinese investors interested in bullion, while commercial banks increased imports to replenish inventories and meet commitments related to retail gold sales and accumulation plans. Gold accumulation plans, offered by Chinese banks, allow individuals to purchase bullion in small increments and are among the main channels through which retail investors gain exposure to the precious metal. Lower prices support investment demand The international gold price declined 8% during the first half, while the yuan-denominated price dropped 10%, according to a July 14 report by the World Gold Council, or WGC. The WGC calculations were based on the LBMA Gold Price PM, administered by ICE Benchmark Administration, and the Shanghai Benchmark Gold Price PM published by the Shanghai Gold Exchange, or SGE. Both benchmarks fell 11% in June, according to the WGC, which attributed the decline partly to hawkish messages from US Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh that pushed real yields and the dollar higher. The stronger Chinese currency amplified the decline in local gold prices and made internationally sourced bullion relatively cheaper for domestic buyers, according to analysis published by Bloomberg and the WGC. The first-half decline resulted in gold’s first semiannual loss since 2021, the WGC said. Chinese gold-backed exchange-traded funds recorded net demand of 29 tons during the first half, the second-strongest first-half performance on record, according to WGC calculations based on company filings. The funds’ total assets under management stood at 243 billion yuan ($36 billion) at the end of June, while their aggregate holdings reached 277 tons, the WGC said. Chinese gold ETFs suffered record monthly outflows of 15 billion yuan ($2.2 billion) in June, reducing their holdings by 17 tons, according to the WGC. The council attributed the June outflows to weaker gold prices and rising investor interest in Chinese equities, as reflected in increased stock-market account openings. Despite the monthly outflow, Chinese gold ETFs attracted about 40 billion yuan ($5.6 billion) during the first half, the WGC said, based on data from fund company filings. Institutional investor participation and uncertainty surrounding geopolitical and economic developments also supported first-half ETF demand, according to the council. Daily average trading volumes in gold futures on the Shanghai Futures Exchange, or SHFE, rose by 4 tons month-on-month to 305 tons in June, according to SHFE data compiled by the WGC. The June volume remained below the 2025 average of 457 tons per day but exceeded the five-year average of 265 tons, the WGC said. Gold futures turnover averaged 386 tons per day during the first half as price volatility and increased hedging needs supported activity, according to the council’s analysis of SHFE data. Open interest in gold futures stood at 274 tons at the end of June, down 8% during the month and 13% from the end of 2025, the WGC said, citing SHFE figures. Central bank extends record buying streak Gold withdrawals from the SGE rose 36% month-on-month to 87 tons in June, according to SGE data compiled by the WGC. The council attributed the rebound to opportunistic restocking across the supply chain, continued demand for bars and coins, and comparison with May, when withdrawals fell to their lowest level in 16 years. Despite the monthly recovery, June withdrawals remained close to the lowest levels recorded during the past decade because of continued weakness in gold jewelry demand, according to the WGC. Total SGE withdrawals reached 598 tons during the first half, down 12% year-on-year and 27% below the 10-year average, the council said. The historical comparison was based on SGE data covering 2016 to 2025. The WGC said resilient bullion investment was insufficient to offset weak jewelry consumption, which made manufacturers and retailers cautious about replenishing inventories. The PBoC added 15 tons of gold to its reserves in June, its largest monthly purchase since October 2023, according to the WGC, citing figures from China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange. The June purchase brought the central bank’s first-half acquisitions to 40 tons and extended its gold-buying streak to 20 consecutive months, the longest on record, the council said. China’s official gold reserves reached 2,346 tons, equivalent to about 8% of the country’s official foreign exchange assets, according to data from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange cited by the WGC. The central bank accumulated 82 tons of gold during the 20-month purchasing streak, according to WGC calculations based on China’s official reserve disclosures. The WGC said heightened geopolitical tensions, trade disputes and financial-market volatility continued to support gold’s appeal to central banks as an asset without credit risk. Looking ahead, the WGC said Chinese jewelry consumption was likely to remain weak during the seasonal slowdown, although stabilizing gold prices could provide some support. Source： https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/factbox-china-s-gold-imports-jump-89-in-first-half-as-prices-retreat/4012362

[Disturbances from Expectations for US Fed Interest Rate Hikes Combined with Continuous Destocking of China’s Social Inventory; Aluminum Prices to Maintain Consolidation Pattern in the Short Term] Overall, the continuous geopolitical risk premium in the Middle East, combined with continuous destocking of domestic aluminum ingots, jointly underpins aluminum prices. However, the continuous commissioning of long-term aluminum capacity outside China, weak traditional end-use demand in China, together with disturbances from recurrent overseas expectations for US Fed interest rate hikes and uncertainty in the Middle East geopolitical situation, exert significant pressure on the upside room for aluminum prices. In the short term, aluminum prices are expected to maintain a consolidation pattern.

SMM, July 29 – Today's SMM A00 spot aluminum price closed at 23,400 yuan/mt, up 200 yuan/mt from the previous trading day. Aluminum scrap prices across regions generally followed the increase, rising 100-200 yuan/mt. On price spreads, the price difference between A00 aluminum and mixed aluminum extrusion scrap free of paint in Foshan was about 2,030 yuan/mt on July 29, while the price difference between A00 aluminum and shredded aluminum tense scrap in Foshan was about 710 yuan/mt, both remaining at historically low levels. In terms of imports, according to customs data, China's aluminum scrap imports in June 2026 totaled about 132,800 mt, down for the third consecutive month from 152,000 mt in May. Cumulative data for 2026 showed imports totaling about 981,800 mt from January to June. Recently, Guangdong saw increased orders from Southeast Asia, and although the import window improved compared to earlier, new transactions were mostly concentrated in low-price resources, leaving overall spot market activity limited. Affected by the UAE's aluminum scrap export ban and the EU's tariff hike policies, the contraction in supply of high-quality imported aluminum scrap will become more evident going forward. This week, the aluminum scrap market is expected to remain in a narrow range-bound pattern characterized by demand pressure and cost support. With the deepening off-season, downstream end-user orders are unlikely to improve materially. Scrap utilization enterprises will stick to purchasing as needed, and procurement sentiment is unlikely to recover significantly. The mainstream trading range for shredded aluminum tense scrap (priced based on aluminum content) is expected to hover around 19,800-20,500 yuan/mt. Currently, the price difference between A00 aluminum and aluminum scrap has narrowed to a historical low, significantly weakening the economic advantage of aluminum scrap over primary aluminum. If primary aluminum prices continue to decline, the substitution effect of primary aluminum for aluminum scrap will accelerate. It is necessary to closely monitor the crowding-out effect of aluminum price trends on aluminum scrap demand.