Published at:13th May 2026, 1:44 pm Overview India doubled platinum import duties to 15.4%, escalating costs for vehicles reliant on catalytic converters, particularly diesel SUVs and strong hybrids. This move, aimed at forex conservation, is expected to increase car prices and may accelerate the shift toward battery electric vehicles as automakers seek to mitigate rising input expenses. Duty Hike Increases Vehicle Costs India's decision to more than double its import duty on platinum, from 6.4% to 15.4%, is set to significantly increase costs for the domestic auto industry. This policy, aimed at conserving foreign exchange reserves amid geopolitical instability in West Asia, directly impacts the supply chain for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, particularly their emission control systems. The move is expected to raise production costs, hitting vehicle segments that use more platinum in their catalytic converters the hardest, such as diesel sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and strong hybrid models. Market Reaction and Stock Divergence Investor reaction was mixed. Some component suppliers saw their shares decline, with Sharda Motor Industries dropping 2.1% to INR 950. In contrast, larger automakers like Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki saw modest gains, rising 1.2% to INR 1250 and 1.5% to INR 13000. Analysts noted that companies like Maruti Suzuki (P/E 35, market cap ~$35 billion) are better positioned to pass on input costs than smaller suppliers. Tata Motors (market cap ~$20 billion, P/E 28) faces higher direct costs due to its significant diesel SUV range, while Mahindra & Mahindra (market cap ~$25 billion, P/E 32) is also exposed through its diesel-heavy offerings. Estimating Price Hikes and Emission Compliance Costs The increased duty increases the cost of meeting BS-VI emission standards. Industry estimates suggest potential price increases ranging from ₹2,500–₹4,000 for entry-level petrol cars, ₹8,000–₹12,000 for mid-size diesel SUVs, and ₹12,000–₹18,000 for strong hybrids. These figures reflect higher platinum-group metal loading, from 2-4 grams in petrol cars to 6-10 grams in diesel SUVs and 10-15 grams in hybrids. Component manufacturers such as Bosch India (P/E 45, market cap ~$12 billion) and Tenneco (P/E 15, market cap ~$3 billion) will likely face contract renegotiations, as most agreements include commodity pass-through clauses. Past duty adjustments in 2023 led to 3-5% price hikes for affected vehicles and temporary stock declines for OEMs, a pattern that could repeat if automakers cannot fully pass on costs. The Indian auto sector, which reported 8-10% year-over-year volume growth in Q1 2026, now faces added margin pressure on top of existing commodity and currency challenges. Global platinum prices have recently traded between $950-$1050 per ounce, influenced by industrial demand and global events. Risks for Automakers and EV Competition The higher import duty poses a significant risk for automakers and component suppliers heavily reliant on platinum-based catalytic converters. Companies with large portfolios of diesel SUVs and strong hybrids, including Ashok Leyland (P/E 22, market cap ~$7 billion) and Toyota Kirloskar Motor (a subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corp), face direct cost increases. This duty burden worsens their competitive position against battery electric vehicle (BEV) makers. While Tata Motors is investing in its EV division, its existing ICE operations are now less cost-competitive. Component suppliers like Sharda Motor Industries (P/E 19, market cap ~$1.5 billion) may struggle to absorb rising costs without affecting order volumes as OEMs seek to keep consumer prices stable. Previous supply chain issues have also highlighted the risks of relying on specific imported materials. Recent analysis of Q4 FY26 filings from most Indian OEMs showed strong demand but also noted existing supply chain cost pressures, suggesting limited room for absorbing further increases without impacting profitability or market share. Mitigating Costs and Shifting to EVs Automakers are exploring ways to manage these rising costs. Strategies include accelerating R&D to reduce platinum loading in catalytic converters and expanding precious metal recycling. The government's concessional duty of 4.35% on imported spent catalysts for recovery offers a pathway for recycling the metal. Analysts believe this could slightly improve the cost competitiveness of BEVs, which do not use catalytic converters. Platinum's growing importance in emerging technologies like hydrogen fuel cells and electrolysers may also lead to strategic reviews of its domestic availability and pricing. Source： https://www.whalesbook.com/news/English/auto/Indias-Platinum-Duty-Hike-Squeezes-ICE-Vehicle-Costs

[SMM Silver Express] India raised the basic customs duty on gold and silver imports from 5% to 10%. Indian banks proactively paid the duties to resume imports, clearing 9 tonnes of gold and 34 tonnes of silver in May.

According to reports, on the 26th, the Executive Management Committee of Brazil’s Foreign Trade Chamber (Gecex) decided to implement a four-month zero-tariff policy on 191 electronic and information technology products for which import duties had previously been increased, in order to reduce industrial costs and ensure supply in China. According to Brazil’s Ministry of Development, Industry, Trade and Services, the tariff reduction covered products including smartphones, computer equipment, and electronic components. In early February this year, the Brazilian government raised import tariffs on more than 1,200 electronic products, significantly affecting the mobile phone industry, household appliances, and medical equipment; in late February, it adjusted its tariff policy and applied zero tariffs to 105 of those items.

New Delhi quietly renewed BIS certification waivers through September 2026, even as it talks tough on Chinese overcapacity. The contradiction reveals more about India's industrial gaps than its trade policy convictions

According to consultancy 'Greener', Brazil imported 17.9 GWp of PV modules in 2025, a 24% decline from 2024, with 79% destined for the distributed generation segment. The drop reflects an inventory buildup as distributed additions slowed to 8.8 GW. Despite a fragmented market of 115 brands, the top 10 suppliers—led by JA Solar, Longi, Astronergy, and Risen—accounted for 59% of imports. Import costs have surged to 44% of the product's 'CIF' value due to higher import duties (up from 9% to 25%) and rising freight costs. Looking ahead, the market faces further pricing impacts from the end of Chinese export tax incentives, though some utility-scale projects may benefit from reinstated duty quotas.

The Indian Stainless Steel Development Association (ISSDA) has recently urged the government to permanently remove customs duties on imported scrap and ferroalloys, and to classify chromium as a critical mineral, in order to support the country’s planned expansion of stainless steel capacity from 7 million mt to 11 million mt. At the same time, ISSDA has also called for stronger measures to address the impact of low-priced Chinese products, warning that some Chinese material may be entering India through third countries such as Vietnam, thereby bypassing existing trade protection measures. These statements suggest that the Indian stainless steel industry is no longer simply asking for “growth support.” Instead, it has entered a more complex phase, where it wants to accelerate capacity expansion while also defending itself against external competition. Capacity Expansion Is Clear, and India’s Stainless Steel Industry Has Entered a Critical Phase At first glance, these may look like two conflicting policy demands. On the one hand, the industry wants lower import duties on raw materials to reduce production costs. On the other hand, it is asking the government to tighten import restrictions and strengthen trade protection. But when viewed within the broader industry cycle that India’s stainless steel sector is currently going through, these two demands are not contradictory. They are simply two sides of the same expansion cycle. For domestic stainless steel producers in India, the most important goal over the next few years is to build up local supply capacity while domestic demand is still growing. ISSDA has previously estimated that stainless steel demand in India will continue to grow by 7%–8% annually over the next two to three years. Against this backdrop, the industry wants to keep raw material costs as low as possible during the expansion phase, while also preventing low-priced imported finished products from eroding returns before local capacity expansion is complete. In other words, what worries India’s stainless steel industry most right now is not the absence of market demand, but the possibility that demand exists while the gains from expansion are undermined by imports. That is why ISSDA is simultaneously calling for the permanent removal of duties on scrap and ferroalloy imports, while also highlighting the threat posed by low-priced Chinese products. In the industry’s view, lower tariffs on raw materials would improve the competitiveness of domestic manufacturing, while stronger protection on finished products would buy time for local investment, expansion, and capacity ramp-up. This policy logic of “opening the upstream while defending the downstream” is, in essence, a typical industrial development strategy. Raw Material Security Has Become the Core Condition Behind Expansion This also reflects the industry’s growing concern over raw material supply. Scrap and ferroalloys are key inputs for stainless steel production, while chromium is a critical element in the stainless alloy system. ISSDA’s specific call to classify chromium as a critical mineral shows that its focus is no longer limited to short-term price issues, but has shifted toward medium- to long-term resource security. India has long been the world’s largest importer of stainless steel scrap. Data shows that its stainless scrap imports rose to 1.58 million mt in 2025, up significantly from 2024, further underscoring India’s continued reliance on overseas scrap supply. For a country aiming to expand stainless steel capacity from 7 million mt to 11 million mt, whether the raw material supply system can scale up in parallel will directly determine whether that expansion can actually be delivered. If import costs for scrap and ferroalloys remain high, or if chromium supply security proves insufficient, then even the most ambitious capacity plans could face rising costs, margin pressure, or slower project execution in practice. From the industry’s perspective, therefore, removing duties on imported raw materials and strengthening critical mineral management are not isolated policy demands. They are essential supporting measures for the broader expansion target. India’s stainless steel industry wants to secure the raw material base first before further releasing capacity, reflecting a deeper concern for supply chain completeness and long-term sustainability. Demand Continues to Grow, but Cheap External Supply Creates Real Pressure On the demand side, India is still seen as one of the most important growth markets for stainless steel consumption globally. With the development of manufacturing, continued infrastructure investment, and upgrading in end-use consumption, India’s stainless steel demand is expected to maintain relatively strong growth, providing a solid foundation for capacity expansion. The challenge, however, is that demand growth does not automatically mean domestic producers will benefit. If most of the incremental demand is captured by imported material, India may see consumption expand without domestic industry benefiting to the same extent. In this context, ISSDA’s concerns over Chinese oversupply spilling into India become particularly sensitive. According to media reports, ISSDA believes China has more than 8 million mt of excess stainless steel melting capacity, and that this material is seeking overseas outlets, with India standing out as one of the most attractive target markets. The reason is straightforward. On the one hand, India is itself a growth market. On the other hand, its domestic supply system is still in the process of expanding and has not yet built an unshakable market barrier, making it more exposed to external supply pressure. For Indian mills, this pressure is not only reflected in price competition, but also in investment expectations. When an industry is in the middle of an expansion phase, companies need a relatively predictable margin environment to support new investments, depreciation costs, and capacity ramp-up. If large volumes of low-priced imports continue to flow in during this period, domestic producers may struggle to convert rising demand into actual returns. The Risk of Rerouted Trade Is One of India’s Bigger Concerns Another important point in ISSDA’s latest statement is the issue of rerouted trade. The association warned that some Chinese steel products may be entering India through third countries such as Vietnam, thereby bypassing existing trade protection measures. This concern is easy to understand. In recent years, amid ongoing global trade friction and stricter origin management, practices such as third-country rerouting, supply chain detours, and origin restructuring have come under increasing scrutiny. For India, this means that even if trade protection measures exist on paper, actual import pressure may not disappear in practice. In other words, what truly concerns the industry is not simply whether tariffs or barriers exist, but whether these measures can actually work as intended. If external supply can continue entering India through more complex trade routes, then the competitive pressure facing domestic producers will not ease in any meaningful way, weakening the real impact of policy protection. India’s Core Objective Is to Turn Demand Advantage Into Industrial Advantage At a deeper level, India’s stainless steel industry is moving from a stage of demand-driven growth to one of broader industrial competition. In the past, discussion of India’s stainless steel market often focused on its consumption growth potential, including its large population base, urbanization, and manufacturing upgrade. But as consumption continues to expand, the question is no longer simply whether demand will grow, but who will ultimately capture that growth. If domestic demand keeps rising while most of the incremental market is filled by imports, India may become a major consumption market without necessarily becoming a true manufacturing powerhouse. What ISSDA is now pushing for is, in effect, the key step needed to turn India’s demand advantage into industrial advantage. That is why the industry is asking the government to lower upstream raw material costs while at the same time strengthening trade defense at the finished-product end. The underlying logic is not simply to reject imports, but to create a more supportive environment for domestic manufacturing to grow and attract investment. The Direction of Future Policy Is Worth Watching Viewed within the broader competitive landscape of the Asian stainless steel market, India’s position is actually becoming quite clear. It does not want to remain merely a consumption market. It wants to become a more complete domestic manufacturing center. That means its policy stance is likely to continue along a dual-track approach: more openness toward key raw materials, and greater caution toward finished-product imports. For the market, there are several developments worth watching. First, whether India will further reduce import duties on scrap and ferroalloys on a long-term basis, or even establish a more stable policy framework for raw material support. Second, whether chromium will be formally included in the country’s critical mineral system, thereby strengthening resource security. Third, whether India will step up anti-dumping, anti-circumvention, and origin-related scrutiny, especially against third-country rerouting paths. If these directions gradually materialize, they could reshape competition in India’s stainless steel market, alter its import structure, and even change broader resource flows across Asia. Conclusion Overall, ISSDA’s latest public stance does not simply signal another trade friction issue. It reflects the broader priorities of India’s stainless steel industry as it enters a new stage: securing raw material supply and cost competitiveness for expansion, while also preventing low-priced external supply from undermining domestic industry during a critical window. Whether India’s stainless steel story can evolve from one of consumption growth into one of manufacturing rise may depend not only on the pace of demand growth itself, but also on whether the government can build a policy mix that effectively balances resources, tariffs, and trade protection in a way that genuinely supports domestic industrial upgrading. Written by: Bruce Chew | bruce.chew@metal.com +601167087088