SMM June 8 – SMM Nickel: Macro and Market News: (1) US non-farm payrolls increased by 172,000 in May, beating expectations, while job gains for March and April were revised up by a combined 93,000. The market is fully pricing in a 25bp rate hike by the US Fed before year-end. (2) The PBOC increased gold reserves for a 19th consecutive month, up 320,000 ounces MoM; China’s foreign exchange reserves rose to $3,442.2 billion at the end of May. Spot Market: On June 8, SMM #1 refined nickel price rose 1,400 yuan/mt from the previous trading day. In terms of spot premiums, Jinchuan #1 refined nickel averaged 1,000 yuan/mt, up 50 yuan/mt from the previous trading day, while electrodeposited nickel from mainstream domestic brands ranged from -600 to 400 yuan/mt. Futures Market: The most-traded SHFE nickel 2607 contract edged higher in early trading and closed the morning session at 139,830 yuan/mt, up 0.79%. US non-farm payrolls data beat expectations, fueling rate hike bets; the US dollar strengthened, weighing on risk assets. Global visible refined nickel inventory stood at around 390,000 mt, and China continued to see inventory buildup. Nickel prices faced resistance. However, the supply of sulfur, an auxiliary material for intermediate products, remained tight, and MHP production cuts have not been resumed. Strong cost support at the bottom remains. The most-traded SHFE nickel contract is seen trading in a range of 137,000-145,000 yuan/mt.

[SMM Daily Commentary: Non-farm Payrolls Exceed Expectations, Weighing on Silver Prices; Spot Quotes Gradually Approach Parity] SMM, June 8 – Non-farm payrolls data exceeded expectations strongly, heating up rate hike expectations, and silver prices plunged more than 8% in a single day. Spot market quotes gradually moved toward parity, with downstream wait-and-see sentiment thick and trading sluggish.

Futures: Last Friday, the LME lead 3M contract opened at $2,015/mt, edged down slightly during Asian hours, then moved sideways in a narrow range of $2,006.5-2,012/mt; in the European session, it gradually strengthened on fund buying, touching a high of $2,018.5/mt, but met significant overhead resistance, pulled back toward the close, dipped to $1,999/mt, and finally settled at $1,995/mt. Last Friday night, the most-traded SHFE lead 2606 contract opened at 16,380 yuan/mt, briefly surged to 16,455 yuan/mt in early trading before coming under pressure and pulling back. It then fluctuated downward, breaking below the daily average line support, hitting a low of 16,365 yuan/mt, and finally settled at 16,405 yuan/mt, ending as a small bearish candlestick, down 30 yuan/mt or 0.18%. On the macro front: Israel launched airstrikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs, Iran responded with missile attacks, and Trump urgently intervened. US May non-farm payrolls increased by a stronger-than-expected 172,000, and the market fully priced in a 25bp rate hike by the Fed before year-end. Trump: There is no reason for the Fed to raise rates; the jobs report is very strong, stocks should go up, and economic growth does not mean inflation. Iran denied that it had agreed to transfer some enriched uranium to a third country. OPEC+ seven countries will raise production targets by 188,000 barrels per day from July. Putin rejected Zelenskiy’s “talks” proposal, saying it was meaningless. Sources: The US government is considering taking stakes in AI companies. The PBOC increased its gold reserves for the 19th straight month, up 320,000 ounces MoM. CSRC Chairman Wu Qing: Resolutely curb pseudo-innovations such as concept hype, complex nesting, excessive speculation, and channel arbitrage. Spot fundamentals: Last Friday, SHFE lead remained weak. Suppliers showed divergent selling attitudes, with some halting shipments, some selling at market, and some holding prices firm. Primary lead smelter cargoes self-picked up from production site were quoted at premiums of 0-25 yuan/mt against the SMM #1 lead average price, with ultra-high premiums (against SMM #1 lead) being lowered or shifting from discounts to premiums. In secondary lead, smelters’ losses widened, and most refrained from selling at low prices, with some secondary refined lead quotations at premiums of 0-75 yuan/mt against SMM #1 lead ex-works. Meanwhile, downstream enterprises continued dip-buying on a need-to basis, but limited rigid demand meant purchasing enthusiasm weakened compared with the previous sharp price decline. Inventories: On June 5, LME lead inventory fell by 2,175 mt to 310,350 mt; as of June 4, SMM lead ingot social inventory across five regions totaled 67,100 mt, down 1,200 mt from May 28, and up about 300 mt from June 1. Lead price outlook today: Recently, primary and secondary lead enterprises in Henan, Anhui and other regions have concentrated production resumptions, significantly increasing lead ingot supply. However, downstream consumption recovery is slow, enterprises’ purchase willingness is weak, and combined with the off-season and high temperatures, some downstream enterprises plan to suspend production for holidays, further weakening the consumption side. But as lead prices declined, scrap battery prices experienced relatively limited declines due to tight supply, leading to widening losses for secondary lead enterprises, while the cost side still provided some support for lead prices.

June 3, 2026 A historic milestone in the structure of the global financial system: By the end of 2025, gold had overtaken U.S. Treasury bonds as the largest component of global reserve assets. With a share now of around 27 percent—up from 20 percent at the end of 2024—the precious metal has clearly left the U.S. securities, which slipped from 25 to 22 percent, far behind. This shift is more than just a footnote. It is the result of an unprecedented price rally, sustained central bank purchases, and a profound geopolitical realignment. Valuation Effects vs. Physical Demand Gold’s rapid rise to the top is largely driven by price movements. Nominal gains of around 60 percent in 2025 and about 30 percent in 2024 have catapulted the precious metal’s weighting on balance sheets. If we adjust for this extreme price effect and use the prices from late 2023 as a basis, the picture becomes more nuanced: In this scenario, U.S. Treasury bonds continue to dominate significantly with 26 percent, while gold and the euro are tied at 16 percent each. Nevertheless, behind the pure valuation effects lies a solid, physical foundation. Geopolitics dictates purchases Central banks remain the driving force in the physical market. Although their demand recently fell slightly to 863 tons—just below the 1,000-ton mark of the previous three years—the official sector’s appetite remains unquenched. Notably, the largest purchases come from regions that are specifically arming themselves against external conflict risks. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, certain players have dominated the field: China increased its reserves by more than 350 tons. It was followed by Poland (320 tons), Turkey (220 tons), and India (130 tons). In 2025 alone, Poland once again secured the top spot as the largest buyer with around 100 tons, followed by Kazakhstan, Brazil, China, and Turkey. The motives behind this massive accumulation are structural in nature. Nitesh Shah, chief commodities analyst at WisdomTree, points out that the freezing of Russian central bank assets has set a precedent. The politicization of the U.S. dollar and other G7 currencies offers a massive incentive for many countries to reduce their dependence on these currency areas. Another crucial factor: spiraling government debt. Unlike bonds or fiat currencies , physical gold carries no counterparty risk—it is simply not the liability of another debtor. Structural Limits of Gold Reserves Despite this momentum, the sky is not the limit for gold. At the monetary policy level, the precious metal faces structural hurdles as an official reserve asset compared to major fiat currencies. It is price-volatile, yields no current interest income, and incurs storage costs. The most significant difference from bond markets, however, lies in the lack of elasticity: the physical supply of gold is inherently limited and cannot be expanded at will to respond to short-term shifts in international liquidity. Gold Outlook This paints a complex but extremely solid picture for the gold market. Even though demand has slowed somewhat since the start of the year, the World Gold Council expects central bank purchases of around 850 tons for the current year. Regardless of shifts driven purely by valuation, the precious metal has impressively reinforced its role as an indispensable monetary asset in a world marked by tensions and debt crises. With a share now of around 27 percent—up from 20 percent at the end of 2024—the precious metal has clearly left U.S. securities behind, which slipped from 25 to 22 percent. This shift is more than just a footnote. It is the result of an unprecedented price rally, sustained central bank purchases, and a profound geopolitical realignment. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/major-shift-in-the-financial-system-gold-overtakes-u-s-treasury-bonds-in-global-reserves

May 31, 2026 Over the past two weeks, the price of gold has failed to recover further. Instead, its failure to break through the falling 50-day moving average increased downward pressure, causing gold to be pushed back down to $4,366 this morning—and thus to the 200-day moving average—amid the resurgent Iran crisis. Silver presents a similar picture; here, even lower price targets are in play. Overall, precious metals have been in a healthy but treacherous and confusing correction since the end of January, one that is likely not yet over. The ongoing conflict in the Middle East remains the dominant and highly unpredictable risk factor for commodity and financial markets . A sustainable solution does not appear to be in sight. Rather, physical oil and gas shipments through the Strait of Hormuz remain well below pre-crisis levels. Europe’s reserves have so far cushioned the supply bottlenecks but are now nearing depletion. As long as the logistical bottlenecks remain unresolved, volatility will stay high. In addition, the vulnerability of financial markets is increasing. Short-term signs of peace can abruptly push oil prices down, while setbacks or military escalations drive them back up just as quickly—an environment in which precious metals are also suffering. On the macro side, however, the dilemma for risk assets is intensifying, particularly for the heavily overbought stock markets. The recent price increases caused by rising energy prices heighten the risk of accelerating inflation, meaning central banks could be forced to raise interest rates and tighten monetary policy. Whether the central banks can actually implement this at all, given the complex and fragile starting point, remains questionable, however. However, the mere expectation of higher real interest rates could put further pressure on the gold price, even if this interest rate trend ultimately fails to materialize. At the same time, rising energy prices are supporting the inflation outlook and, in the long term, the demand for inflation-protected assets . China continues to shift into gold Chinese holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds, as of May 25, 2026. © Bloomberg At the same time, China’s holdings of U.S. Treasuries have fallen to their lowest level since 2008, while official gold reserves continue to rise. China is thus consistently shifting assets from dollars to gold. However, the decline in Treasury holdings is also, to some extent, a matter of accounting. A significant portion of China’s reserves was apparently held through custodians such as Belgium or transferred to the balance sheets of state-owned banks. Economically, the exposure to U.S. Treasury bonds thus remains, even if it no longer appears directly under China’s name in official statistics. The composition has therefore changed more significantly than the actual risk. What is changing, however, is the nature of sovereign risk management. Like other strategically minded nations, China is gradually reducing its vulnerability to assets carrying political counterparty risk. While U.S. Treasuries are liquid and deeply traded, they ultimately remain claims within a Western-dominated financial system. Under extreme conditions, they can be frozen or subject to sanctions. Gold, on the other hand, has no issuer, no counterparty risk, no digital barriers to access, and has been money for millennia. The Chinese are not seeking an abrupt exit from the Western financial system, but rather a reduction in dependence and greater freedom of action. Nevertheless, the price of gold has been in a correction since the end of January, which, in our view, is more than justified and, above all, healthy following the spectacular gains of the past three and a half years. Semiconductor Boom vs. Dot-Com Bubble, May 27, 2026. © The Great Martis The only real cause for concern is that stock markets have recently surged into parabolic price movements amid a very fragile, geopolitically strained environment. The AI rally has driven semiconductor stocks in particular into completely overvalued territory: The semiconductor sector is currently more overbought than it has been in twenty years. NVIDIA is trading at a trailing P/E ratio of around 33 and has posted a 44% gain in the last two months alone. Micron Technology has seen its share price rise by 1,450% over the past 14 months! Margin levels (i.e., speculative trading on credit) stand at approximately $1.3 trillion (5.2% of GDP), exceeding the peak levels of 2008 and the dot-com era. Should a reversal and correction occur here, precious metals are likely to be dragged down with them in a temporary liquidity crunch. That is why we would like to mention our worst-case scenario of $3,500 for the gold price once again at this point. Gold – Our price target “200-day line” was reached today Gold in US dollars, daily chart as of May 28, 2026. © GOLD.DE As suspected, the falling 50-day line ($4,628) has stopped the gold price twice on its way up over the past six weeks. In light of this difficult-to-overcome and psychologically burdensome barrier, a new, sharp downward wave began on May 12, which today reached our repeatedly mentioned price target in the form of the 200-day line ($4,392). This means that, in our view, the bulk of the correction potential for the gold price has been exhausted for now. We had consistently emphasized that the first support level at the 200-day moving average of $4,100 from March 23 did not constitute a sufficiently solid foundation. However, the problem is that the silver price has not yet reached its 200-day moving average (US$66.56) during the correction that has been underway since late January, and no real panic has yet been observed in the precious metals sector. Despite the already oversold conditions in the gold market, we would therefore not be surprised to see the correction continue down to the lower Bollinger Band on the weekly chart ($4,289). Overall, the price action reflects a typical spring correction. We already see buying opportunities again between $4,250 and $4,400. We initially expect a bottom to form in this range, which should then lay the foundation for a foreseeable recovery and the summer rally. Conclusion: Gold – Correction Continues, Buying Opportunities Ahead Gold and silver have been undergoing a healthy but not yet complete correction since late January: Gold failed twice at the falling 50-day moving average and has now fallen back to its 200-day moving average. Silver, on the other hand, still faces significantly more downside risk, as the 200-day moving average has not yet been tested at all. Although a test of the lower weekly Bollinger Bands around $4,280 on the gold market would therefore not be surprising, we already see attractive entry prices between $4,250 and $4,400. However, macroeconomic and geopolitical risks remain high and are increasing volatility in the short term: The Iran crisis and the ongoing bottlenecks through the Strait of Hormuz continue to weigh on commodity and energy markets and weaken Europe’s security of supply. In the long term, however, China’s shift from U.S. Treasuries to gold supports demand for precious metals. Only a broad-based sell-off in the heavily overbought stock markets—driven by high margin leverage and an overheated semiconductor/AI rally—could also put gold under significant short-term pressure in the event of a liquidity crunch; our worst-case scenario therefore remains $3,500. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-correction-continues-buying-opportunities-are-emerging

May 19, 2026 key takeaways. Gold’s recent price consolidation does not, in our view, undermine the medium-term case for higher prices Structural support remains intact, with resilient central bank and private investor demand, reflecting broad fiscal uncertainty and currency concerns The key risks to watch would be a shift to more restrictive central bank policies that pushes real yields higher for longer, or a deterioration in passive fund flows We stay constructive on gold, maintain our overweight allocation in portfolios, and keep our 12-month price target at USD 5,400/oz. Gold has been one of the defining financial assets of the last 12 months. Yet after a strong performance, especially in the second half of 2025, prices have stalled. Momentum has cooled, and the metal has at times lagged what investors might have expected from a haven asset during a period of geopolitical stress. Gold has been one of the defining financial assets of the last 12 months. Yet after a strong performance, especially in the second half of 2025, prices have stalled. Momentum has cooled, and the metal has at times lagged what investors might have expected from a haven asset during a period of geopolitical stress. Gold prices more than doubled in the year to January 2026, reaching a record USD 5,595 per ounce before declining in the wake of the Middle East conflict to a trough of USD 4,099/oz in mid-March, most recently reaching USD 4,560/oz. In contrast to comparable periods of geopolitical tension – such as the Iranian Revolution in 1979, the first and second Gulf Wars, or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – gold has seen a larger drawdown with much higher levels of volatility. It has fallen by over 10% since the conflict began. We believe this reflects market concerns over inflation and crowded investor positioning at the start of 2026. As a non-yielding asset, gold performs best when real yields decline and the US dollar depreciates. However, an energy supply shock can have the opposite effect, resulting in markets pricing higher central bank rate expectations, higher yields and a firmer US dollar. It is therefore unsurprising that gold has shown a strong negative relationship with rising energy prices. If the Middle East conflict de-escalates and energy prices fall, in line with our base scenario, gold could recover, supported by some normalising of previously high investor positioning. Gold prices more than doubled in the year to January 2026, reaching a record USD 5,595 per ounce… Still, the Middle East conflict is not the only variable for prices. The medium-term outlook is also determined by whether demand and the broader geopolitical and fundamental macroeconomic environment have changed. Here, we do not see a shift and therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our 12-month price target of USD 5,400/oz, and our overweight allocation in portfolios. To understand gold’s recent loss of momentum, it helps to separate structural from short-term drivers. At the structural level, demand from both central banks and private investors remains resilient. This explains how short-term headwinds – including a stronger dollar and higher bond yields – can create temporary weakness without undermining longer-run demand. In other words, slowing momentum should not be mistaken for a structural reversal. Structural incentives to hold gold The most compelling structural case for gold lies in incentives for investors, private and public, to hold a real asset. Yet unlike most currencies, where supply can expand due to monetary and fiscal easing, gold supply has been stable through history: industry estimates suggest some 220,000 tonnes of gold have been mined throughout history, with new mine output adding just over 1% to above-ground stocks each year . Moreover, unlike currencies, gold is not subject to financial sanctions. US sanctions on Russia accelerated central banks’ desire to hold reserve assets such as gold that are insulated from such threats while preserving value. As more countries gradually diversify away from use of the US dollar and settle trade in other currencies, demand for neutral reserve assets such as gold rises. At the structural level, demand from both central banks and private investors remains resilient At the same time, lower confidence in some currencies has supported private investor demand, especially as gold helps portfolio diversification. Persistent fiscal uncertainty and still-high inflation reinforce this trend. When investors question the long-term path of public debt, the capacity to finance deficits, or policy credibility, demand for diversified assets increases. In this environment, gold can provide a hedge against risks that are hard to manage – including inflation surprises, poor management of government finances that ends up constraining monetary policy, or declining confidence in institutions. The price of gold, for example, has recently correlated with fears around the Federal Reserve’s independence. Persistent demand trends contribute to price appreciation Over the past decade, there has been a strong link between total gold volumes bought by both private investors and central banks, and real gold prices. Approximately 400 metric tonnes of quarterly demand is consistent with price stability, with every additional 100 tonnes associated with roughly a three-percentage-point rise in quarterly prices. Since 2023, demand has averaged about 620 tonnes a quarter, well above the 450-tonne average between 2010 and 2022. Despite concerns about weaker demand this year, World Gold Council data shows total demand of 790 tonnes over the first quarter of 2026, of which central banks purchased a net 244 tonnes, a 3% increase year on year. Private demand was roughly in line with 2025’s average. Lower ETF flows were offset by higher demand for physical gold, with China accounting for 40% of the total. Central banks can create a higher ‘floor’ From 1980 to 2005, central banks reduced their gold reserves, and that trend accelerated after the Cold War with globalisation, and US security guarantees for allies. However, recent years have re-set international relations, and central banks have rapidly increased their gold purchases . The rationale is straightforward: reserve managers’ gold purchases reflect concerns about US financial sanctions, broader geopolitical uncertainty, and unpredictable trade policies. The share of gold in overall reserves held by emerging market central banks is still less than their developed market peers While demand has been strongest in emerging countries, a structurally higher baseline of purchases by central banks across many countries can reduce the depth and duration of any price falls, particularly if private investor flows become volatile. Importantly, the share of gold in overall reserves held by emerging market central banks is still less than their developed market peers, suggesting more room for buying. As a result, such demand is likely to remain. Recently, some emerging market countries, such as Turkey, have sold or swapped gold reserves to manage currency depreciation pressures exacerbated by the conflict in the Middle East. We see such moves as exceptions to the broader trend of purchases in countries with free-floating exchange rates. Real yields and monetary credibility The outlook for interest rates and their impact on private investor flows will be another key factor for gold prices. Gold is sensitive to real yields: when they fall, the opportunity cost of holding gold declines, supporting prices. This link has re-asserted itself in recent months. In principle, a more restrictive Federal Reserve monetary policy could weigh on gold prices if it resulted in persistently higher real yields. However, we see this risk as limited. The Fed is likely to keep policy rates on hold for much of 2026, with any rate cut more likely towards the end of the year. Rate moves matter for investor flows into the gold market. Physically-backed ETFs, which allow investors to gain exposure to gold without owning the metal, tend to be sensitive to rate expectations. Even after strong inflows, total ETF holdings are not back to their historical highs. Broadly stable flows would support demand. We therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our overweight allocation and our 12‑month price target of USD 5,400/oz The structural case remains intact We do not expect the recent gold price consolidation to alter its medium-term trajectory. Cooling investor sentiment does not undermine the structural case for gold, but instead shifts focus back to slower-moving drivers including central bank demand, portfolio allocation and fiscal uncertainty. Three factors support this view. First, demand remains resilient despite volatility. Second, the macro context still favours real assets amid fiscal uncertainty and the gradual erosion of purchasing power. Third, recent headwinds look short term rather than structural – including higher yields and a stronger US dollar, which we see as temporary. Risks remain. Negative factors to watch would be higher-for-longer real yields, a prolonged decline in ETF demand, or lower physical demand, for example for jewellery, even if that were partly offset by central bank buying. We therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our overweight allocation and our 12-month price target of USD 5,400/oz. Our structural case for the precious metal rests on resilient demand, fiscal uncertainty and the gradual erosion of US dollar purchasing power. Source： https://www.lombardodier.com/insights/2026/may/gold-s-slowdown.html