According to foreign media reports, LG Energy Solution plans to start operating its Plant 9 in Nanjing, China, in the second half of 2026. The new facility will add cylindrical battery production lines to meet the growing demand from Tesla's electric vehicles. The plant was completed two to three years ago and will be put into operation for the first time. Employees for the new production lines are expected to report to work around July 20. The company plans to initially start operating two new cylindrical battery production lines at Plant 9 in the second half of this year, with additional production lines gradually added over time. Each production line has an annual capacity of approximately 2GWh, with the total capacity expected to expand to the tens of GWh level.

[July 2026 Lithium Battery Recycling Project Commissioning Summary] In July 2026, China experienced a concentrated window for commissioning lithium battery recycling projects. Multiple leading and regionally distinctive enterprises intensively commissioned new production lines, while multiple approaches—including hydrometallurgy, pyrometallurgy, cross-border dismantling, and second-life applications—were simultaneously deployed. New compliant processing capacity expanded significantly, and the industry officially entered the large-scale implementation stage. Details of the key commissioning enterprises and projects are as follows:

SMM, July 16: This week, transaction sentiment in China's aluminum fluoride market softened somewhat, while aluminum fluoride prices remained stable. As of now, SMM aluminum fluoride prices closed at 10,950-11,400 yuan/mt; cryolite prices held steady, with SMM quoting 7,000-9,000 yuan/mt. Raw material side: China's 97% fluorite wet powder market consolidated on a strong note this week, with mainstream delivered prices at 3,100-3,450 yuan/mt, while regional price spreads persisted. Supply side, affected by safety incidents, nationwide mine safety inspections intensified markedly, and most mines in core production areas like Zhejiang and Fujian have entered shutdown self-inspection and rectification stages, dragging down the industry's overall operating rate and tightening spot cargo availability. Although production resumptions at some northern mines and increased imports from Mongolia provided partial supplement, supply remained tight overall amid widespread sentiment of holding back from selling and holding prices firm among ore sellers. Demand side, still in the traditional off-season, fluorine chemical enterprises kept operating rates reduced, hydrofluoric acid operating rates stayed low, and downstream demand in refrigerants and fluoropolymers was sluggish, with procurement mostly need-based, capping price upside. As the support from tightening spot supply gradually emerged, market sentiment improved, and transaction prices edged up. However, with no fundamental improvement in off-season demand, the sustainability and upside room of this rebound still face pressure. China's aluminum hydroxide market drifted lower this week, with SMM weighted average price at 1,690 yuan/mt, edging down 0.41% WoW. The sulphuric acid market consolidated at highs. Overall, raw material price trends diverged, and comprehensive production costs for aluminum fluoride remained high. Supply side, trapped in a negative cycle of high costs, deep losses, and low operating rates, rising raw material prices exacerbated cost-side losses, widening the loss margin, prompting more maintenance shutdowns and flexible production adjustments, further reducing overall operating rates. Some enterprises adopted a contraction strategy, prioritizing long-term contract deliveries with virtually no new production schedules, limiting effective supply growth. Demand side, downstream operating aluminum capacity stayed high, providing a rigid demand floor for aluminum fluoride, but aluminum smelters remained cautious in procurement, mainly restocking on a need-to basis and pushing for lower prices, with no incremental purchase demand released. Commentary: This week, upstream raw materials for aluminum fluoride diverged—fluorite edged up, aluminum hydroxide weakened, and sulphuric acid consolidated at highs. Industry-wide production costs stayed high, making it difficult for producers to restore profitability, and production stockpiling sentiment was weak. Currently, the tug-of-war between upstream and downstream is intense, with no clear directional driver, and transactions mostly involve sporadic need-based restocking. Short-term aluminum fluoride prices are expected to hold in a stalemate, with limited room for movement. Close attention should be paid to raw material cost dynamics and marginal adjustments in downstream aluminum enterprises' procurement pace.

Looking ahead to H2, macro attention should be on the US Fed’s subsequent interest rate hike moves and the pending results of the Section 232 tariff survey.

Price Trends In the first half of 2026, domestic lithium hydroxide prices followed a trajectory of "surge – high-level volatility – softening decline," with the price center first rising and then falling amid the interplay of multiple factors. January: Prices surged sharply. Concentrated maintenance shutdowns at major lithium salt producers tightened spot supply. Combined with persistently rising costs of lithium carbonate and lithium ore, lithium salt producers held firm on pricing, pushing the monthly average price up by 65% month-on-month. Although ternary material manufacturers maintained just-in-time procurement and remained cautious on spot orders, and some import flows returned due to domestic-international price spreads, the phase of supply shortages and cost support still drove prices to a high level. February: Prices fluctuated at high levels with thinning trading. Macro sentiment drove overall lithium prices downward, but producers' firm pricing stance persisted. Downstream ternary manufacturers, having ample inventories and some entering maintenance, saw eased raw material shortages, with procurement mostly based on monthly average prices. During the Chinese New Year holiday, transportation of lithium hydroxide, classified as hazardous chemicals, stalled, leading to a seasonal quiet period; post-holiday restocking demand was tepid, limiting upside momentum, and prices oscillated widely throughout the month. March: Gains narrowed notably. Cell manufacturers' offtake fell short of expectations, and new orders for ternary materials were limited. Additionally, increased customer-supplied materials in mid-month sharply reduced spot demand, leading to subdued trading and an upward price channel that stalled. The monthly average price rose only 3.4% month-on-month. April: First down then up. In the first half, limited new ternary orders and scarce spot demand put mild pressure on prices; in the second half, pre-holiday stocking and new orders drove increased inquiries from ternary producers, while sharp rises in lithium carbonate and ore prices pulled lithium hydroxide higher. The monthly average price rose 2.73% month-on-month. May: Rose then fell. In the first half, positive demand expectations and supply-side disruptions lifted lithium carbonate and ore prices, pulling lithium hydroxide higher in tandem; in the second half, sentiment turned weaker, with more trades settled via negotiation between traders and material mills. As ternary demand trends became clearer, upstream producers softened their price support, prompting a modest pullback. The monthly average price reached RMB 174,000/ton, up 13.6% month-on-month. June: Prices fell notably, with range-bound volatility intensifying. Frequent supply disruptions on the lithium resource side amplified market volatility significantly, prompting holders to adopt a cautious stance and quote prices in line with market conditions. Upstream producers adjusted prices flexibly, while traders maintained a high discount (over RMB 15,000/ton against the lithium carbonate futures main contract). On the demand side, total ternary material demand remained weak month-on-month, but within the RMB 135,000–145,000/ton range, downstream buyers showed strong willingness to stockpile on dips, providing some bottom support and exacerbating range-bound fluctuations. The monthly average price fell 11.52% month-on-month. Looking at the price trends, the correlation between lithium hydroxide prices and lithium carbonate futures prices has strengthened over the past six months. This is partly because upstream producers use a "lithium carbonate price × discount factor" formula as a floor price in their pricing. On the other hand, traders capitalize on the price spreads between domestic and overseas lithium hydroxide and between hydroxide and carbonate, by importing lithium hydroxide and pricing their sales with reference to lithium carbonate futures, further reinforcing this price linkage. Production In the first half of 2026, domestic total lithium hydroxide output reached 172,000 tons, up 21% year-on-year, driven by relatively robust downstream demand, with notable incremental growth. By output structure, the refining segment contributed the most, accounting for about 88%. Within this, the gradual ramp-up of new production lines at leading companies added some volume, while other enterprises maintained steady output backed by downstream orders, resulting in an 18% year-on-year increase for the overall refining segment. For the causticization segment, most active producers sustained stable operations, and the industry CR5 reached 72% in the first half, indicating a persistently high market concentration. From the capacity utilization perspective, although some capacity has been switched to lithium carbonate production, the operating rate for the lithium hydroxide industry has consistently lingered below 50% over the past six months, reflecting an ongoing overcapacity trend. Costs and margins: For the refining segment, lithium ore feedstock remained relatively tight in the first half of 2026, with ore prices staying elevated and closely correlated with lithium carbonate prices, providing strong cost support for lithium hydroxide. As a result, non‑integrated producers faced notable pressure on the sales side, and their product discount prices did not decline further, which in turn provided marginal support for profit margins at current price levels. For the causticization segment, the supply of salt‑lake‑based lithium salts has increased over the past six months, making causticization feedstock relatively ample. The linkage between actual procurement costs and industrial‑grade carbonate quotes has weakened, which has alleviated cost pressures for enterprises that purchase lithium carbonate externally, leading to actual profitability in the causticization segment being better than theoretical estimates. Import and Export The import‑export landscape has seen a notable reversal. On the export front, since the second half of 2025, some overseas ternary material producers have shifted to entrusting domestic tolling processors, resulting in products that would have been exported being delivered domestically instead, effectively suppressing export volumes. At the same time, overseas demand for ternary materials has remained persistently weak, reducing foreign buyers' appetite for Chinese lithium hydroxide. This, combined with the gradual ramp‑up of overseas local production lines, has collectively kept export volumes at low levels over the past six months. On the import side, weak overseas demand, high accumulated inventories, and arbitrage opportunities have driven import volumes to remain relatively elevated, further reinforcing the net import trend. Supply‑Demand Balance and Inventory The surge in import data made most months in the first half of the year oversupplied. However, from the perspective of directly usable lithium hydroxide products, the market as a whole remained in a relatively tight balance, providing effective support for upstream price control. As for inventory, current lithium hydroxide stock levels have improved significantly compared with the same period last year. This is mainly attributable to two factors: first, part of the inventory has been absorbed into the market by being converted into lithium carbonate; second, active producers have flexibly adjusted their output pace, keeping current inventory days at around one month. Future Outlook Looking ahead, although the LFP route continues to squeeze the ternary route, ternary materials currently have no rival in the high‑nickel segment. In addition, the cost advantages of 6‑series materials offer more possibilities for the ternary route. Based on end‑user production schedules, ternary power demand in the second half of 2026 is expected to maintain a sound performance, growing by approximately 36% compared with the first half. This will drive a roughly 7% sequential increase in ternary material output in the second half. As ternary materials continue to move toward higher nickel content, this brings an incremental demand trend for lithium hydroxide. Meanwhile, considering that most lithium hydroxide production lines have flexible switching or carbonation purification capabilities, lithium hydroxide output is projected to grow by about 6% sequentially. Coupled with a modest recovery in overseas ternary demand, the supply‑demand balance for lithium hydroxide is expected to remain tight through 2026–2027. In terms of price, under a market structure with highly concentrated supply, lithium hydroxide prices are primarily determined by the supply‑demand dynamics of its own industrial chain and closely track lithium ore and lithium salt price trends. Prices are currently oscillating in a range above RMB 150,000/ton. Futures Developments As for lithium hydroxide futures, there has been a flurry of related developments in the second quarter. The Guangzhou Futures Exchange (GFEX) and the Lithium Branch of the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association have both explicitly stated that they will continue to strengthen cooperation and jointly advance the listing of lithium hydroxide and other lithium‑chain futures products. The征求意见稿 of Guangzhou's "15th Five‑Year Plan" for finance also clearly supports GFEX in listing new‑energy futures such as lithium hydroxide. On the industrial side, companies have moved swiftly to follow up. In June, Yahua Group, Shengxin Lithium Energy, and Tianqi Lithium all announced their intention to apply to GFEX for designated delivery factory warehouse status for lithium hydroxide. In addition, Milkyway's shareholders' meeting approved a proposal for its subsidiary to apply to become a designated delivery warehouse for battery‑grade lithium hydroxide at GFEX. According to media reports, lithium salt producers (Ganfeng Lithium, Tianqi Lithium, Yahua Group, etc.) have already positioned themselves in the factory‑warehouse system. However, due to the high‑risk storage requirements of lithium hydroxide—such as strong corrosiveness, exothermic reaction with water, and the need for inert gas protection—no logistics‑focused player had previously entered this category. On the market front, some traders have already made early arrangements in anticipation of futures listing, and the number of merchants participating in lithium hydroxide import trade has noticeably increased. In summary, preparations for the listing of lithium hydroxide futures are progressing in an orderly manner, with positive official signals and accelerating industrial infrastructure development.

The most significant change in the imported copper concentrate market in the first half of 2026 emerged during the mid-year term-contract negotiations. According to SMM, Antofagasta, a leading Chilean mining company, and several major Chinese smelters finalized the pricing mechanism for their mid-year copper concentrate term contracts on July 1. Rather than continuing with the traditional fixed-TC approach, the parties adopted an index-linked pricing mechanism.Chinese smelters had already agreed with Antofagasta on historically low term-contract treatment and refining charges of US$0 per dry metric tonne and US¢0 per pound in 2025. The further introduction of index-based pricing in the 2026 mid-year negotiations indicates that the pricing framework for imported copper concentrate term contracts is undergoing a structural transformation, against a backdrop of persistently and deeply negative spot TCs and steadily strengthening pricing power on the mine side. At a more fundamental level, the change in term-contract pricing reflects the persistent mismatch between mine-supply growth and the expansion of smelting demand. SMM estimates that global sulfide copper concentrate supply will increase by approximately 250,000 tonnes of contained copper in 2026 compared with 2025, representing growth of around 1.3%. By contrast, newly commissioned and expanded primary smelting capacity in China is expected to generate approximately 800,000 tonnes of additional concentrate demand on a contained-copper basis.The increase in mine supply is therefore significantly smaller than the expansion in smelter demand. Meanwhile, factors including the slower-than-expected restart of Grasberg, the continued absence of a full restart at Cobre Panamá, declining ore grades at mature Chilean mines, and the lingering effects of seismic activity at Kamoa-Kakula kept the imported copper concentrate spot market extremely tight throughout the first half of the year.SMM estimates that the global sulfide copper concentrate market will record a supply deficit of approximately 610,000 tonnes of contained copper in 2026. The shortage may not begin to ease until around 2029, when production from a number of new mine projects is expected to come on stream. At the same time, elevated sulfur and sulfuric acid prices have provided an important floor under copper smelter profitability and increased smelters’ ability to absorb deeply negative TCs, at least temporarily. On July 3, the SMM China Copper Smelter Sulfuric Acid Index stood at RMB 1,789 per tonne, up RMB 886 per tonne from RMB 903 per tonne on January 9. The rise in sulfuric acid prices since the beginning of 2026 has become an important earnings driver for Chinese copper smelters and has helped sustain high refined-copper output. Under the combined influence of the mine-smelter supply-demand mismatch and strong by-product margins, spot TCs for imported copper concentrate continued to fall during the first half of 2026. The monthly SMM Imported Copper Concentrate Index averaged negative US$121.44 per dry metric tonne in June, down US$18.31 per dry metric tonne from negative US$103.13 per dry metric tonne in May. On a weekly basis, the SMM Imported Copper Concentrate Index was reported at negative US$113.83 per dry metric tonne in early June and subsequently declined continuously to negative US$124.45 per dry metric tonne on June 26. On July 3, the weekly index fell further to negative US$128.25 per dry metric tonne, down US$3.80 per dry metric tonne from the previous assessment. The successive declines through the negative US$100 and negative US$120 per dry metric tonne thresholds demonstrate that the shortage of tradable spot concentrate continued to intensify. I. Supply: New Supply Falls Short of Expectations as Mine-Side Disruptions Continue to Constrain Tradable Availability Although several global copper projects were scheduled to deliver incremental concentrate supply in the first half of 2026, actual production growth came on stream significantly more slowly than the market had previously expected.The central issue on the supply side was not any single mine incident. Rather, disruptions at major mines, declining grades at mature operations, slower-than-expected ramp-ups at new projects, and changes in trade flows collectively reduced the volume of concentrate available for purchase in China’s spot market. Regarding Cobre Panamá, the Panamanian government approved First Quantum Minerals in April to remove, process and export stockpiled ore that had been mined before the operation was suspended. According to SMM, however, the current progress at Cobre Panamá mainly concerns the treatment of existing stockpiles and does not represent a full restart of mining operations.The mine remains subject to complex disputes involving mining rights, taxation, environmental requirements, local communities and political considerations. Consequently, even if a portion of the stockpiled material enters the market during the second half of 2026, its contribution to improving the global copper concentrate balance is expected to remain limited.Related analysis is available in the SMM article, “Cobre Panamá Copper Mine: From a World-Class Mine to a Shutdown Impasse—SGS Audit Signals the Possibility of a Restart”: https://hq.smm.cn/copper/content/103965399 Grasberg remains one of the largest variables affecting global copper concentrate supply in 2026. At the beginning of the year, Freeport-McMoRan forecast approximately 3.4 billion pounds of copper sales for 2026, based on the assumption that the Grasberg Block Cave would restart and ramp up in stages from the second quarter.Because the restart underperformed expectations, Freeport subsequently lowered its 2026 copper sales guidance to approximately 3.1 billion pounds in its first-quarter report. For the imported copper concentrate market, the significance of Grasberg extends beyond the mine’s headline production figures. Other important factors include the proportion of concentrate absorbed by Indonesia’s domestic smelting sector, PTFI’s smelter inventory arrangements, and the actual quantity of material available for shipment to China’s spot market. Should the recovery at Grasberg continue to fall short of expectations in the second half of the year, the shortage of clean spot concentrate is unlikely to ease materially. In Africa, the effects of seismic activity at Kamoa-Kakula remain ongoing. Ivanhoe Mines previously issued 2026 copper production guidance of 380,000–420,000 tonnes for Kamoa-Kakula, followed by 500,000–540,000 tonnes in 2027. The company also stated that dewatering and rehabilitation work at the Kakula mine was continuing.Compared with the previous medium- to long-term target of annualized production exceeding 550,000 tonnes, however, the pace of production growth in 2026 has slowed significantly. Kamoa-Kakula had been expected to be one of the most important sources of global copper concentrate supply growth in recent years. The slowdown in its production ramp-up has therefore further reduced the potential for mine-supply growth to support a recovery in TCs. In Chile, declining grades at mature mines, transitions toward deeper underground mining, and operational accidents continued to constrain supply flexibility. The effects of the 2025 cave-in at El Teniente extended into 2026. Codelco previously stated that the accident had resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of tonnes of copper production in 2025 and would continue to affect the subsequent recovery schedule.The incident illustrates the structural challenges facing Chile’s large and mature mining operations in areas such as deep-level mining, ground-pressure management, and the timely delivery of replacement and mine-life-extension projects. In addition to El Teniente, several other major Chilean mines continued to face declining grades, throughput fluctuations and maintenance-related disruptions, limiting the recovery potential of Chilean clean-concentrate supply. Peru’s supply performance was comparatively more resilient than Chile’s, although incremental production remained highly concentrated among a limited number of operations. Major mines such as Antamina and Las Bambas benefited during certain periods from higher ore grades, improved recoveries and operational normalization, supporting Peru’s overall copper production.From the perspective of the imported spot market, however, Peruvian supply remains exposed to community disruptions, transportation-corridor interruptions, mine-grade transitions and unstable shipment schedules. Moreover, because much of the incremental production is concentrated among a small number of large mines, it is insufficient to fully offset supply losses associated with Grasberg, Cobre Panamá and mature Chilean mines. In Mongolia, the ramp-up of the Oyu Tolgoi underground mine represents one of the relatively few clearly identifiable sources of incremental global mine supply in 2026. Rio Tinto disclosed that its copper production increased by 11% year on year in 2025, primarily due to the strong ramp-up at Oyu Tolgoi.Nevertheless, while additional output from Oyu Tolgoi is contributing to global supply growth, the incremental volume from this single project remains insufficient to reverse the overall tightness in the copper concentrate spot market, given the larger increase in Chinese smelting demand and recurring disruptions at other major mines. According to SMM estimates, disruptions at major global copper mines and incremental production falling short of expectations will have a combined impact of approximately 480,000 tonnes of contained copper in 2026. Uncertainty surrounding the realization of mine supply therefore remains the primary factor driving imported copper concentrate TCs lower. From a trade-flow perspective, China’s copper concentrate imports from Chile and Peru both declined to varying degrees during the first half of 2026. According to customs data, China imported 3.7640 million tonnes of copper concentrate from Chile during January–May 2026, down 228,000 tonnes, or 5.71%, year on year.Imports from Peru totaled 3.1002 million tonnes during the same period, representing a year-on-year decrease of 147,900 tonnes, or 4.55%. Lower arrivals from the principal South American origins intensified competition among Chinese smelters for alternative feedstocks, blended concentrates, land-transported concentrates and off-specification materials. China’s total imports of copper ores and concentrates amounted to 12.2758 million tonnes during January–May 2026, down 1.01% year on year. The modest decline partly reflected the relatively high comparison base in the corresponding period of 2025. Other contributing factors included strong consumption of copper anode and blister copper in the first quarter, temporary adjustments to some smelters’ raw-material mix, and changes in the arrival schedule of term-contract cargoes.The decline in headline import volumes should therefore not be interpreted simply as evidence of materially weaker concentrate demand from domestic smelters, nor does it have a direct one-to-one relationship with spot TC movements.For the spot market, the more important variables are the marginal volume available outside term contracts, the share of mainstream clean concentrate in the available supply pool, and smelters’ periodic inventory-replenishment requirements. During the first half of 2026, new smelting capacity, continued demand for off-contract inventory replenishment, and frequent mine disruptions kept the spot market tight even though the decline in apparent import volumes was limited. Spot TCs consequently remained under sustained downward pressure. II. Demand: China’s Smelting Expansion Continues While Production Cuts Remain Fragmented On the demand side, Chinese copper smelters remain the principal source of incremental global copper concentrate consumption. Although deeply negative TCs continued to compress core smelting margins during the first half of 2026, and some smelters temporarily reduced operating rates because of maintenance, feedstock constraints and processing-margin losses, the continued commissioning of new and expanded primary smelting capacity kept concentrate demand relatively inelastic. According to SMM statistics, new and expanded primary smelting capacity in China in 2026 is expected to correspond to approximately 800,000 tonnes of contained copper.Newly commissioned capacity typically requires substantial initial feedstock inventories. Even when spot TCs are deeply negative, new production lines must continue purchasing concentrate to ensure operational stability, complete equipment commissioning and ramp-up, and maintain market share. As a result, the practical effectiveness of production cuts by smelters as a mechanism for restoring TCs has been significantly weakened. The Chinese smelting sector in the first half of 2026 was characterized by the coexistence of maintenance-related disruptions and demand generated by capacity expansion. On the one hand, several smelters scheduled maintenance during the second quarter, temporarily reducing concentrate consumption. On the other hand, ramp-ups at newly commissioned facilities, term-contract obligations, low inventory safety margins and strong sulfuric acid earnings prevented smelters from implementing coordinated production cuts.Particularly in an environment where imported concentrate inventories remained structurally tight, some smelters continued to make essential market inquiries to secure production continuity, even when they reduced the frequency of their spot purchases. III. Smelting Economics: Strong Sulfuric Acid Margins Increase Tolerance for Negative TCs, but Volatility Risks Are Rising The earnings structure of copper smelters changed materially during the first half of 2026. Traditionally, smelter profitability has primarily been derived from TC/RC income and credits from gold, silver and other by-products. With spot TCs for imported copper concentrate moving deeply into negative territory, however, processing-fee income fell sharply and sulfuric acid margins became significantly more important. Overall copper smelting margins were weaker in the early part of the first half and improved later in the period. Declining TCs imposed substantial pressure on profitability, but elevated sulfuric acid prices, strong precious-metal prices and improved returns from certain other by-products provided a partial offset.Approximately 3.5–4.0 tonnes of sulfuric acid are produced as a by-product for every tonne of refined copper output. When sulfuric acid prices are high, acid earnings can substantially offset the impact of negative TCs and rising smelting costs. Nevertheless, according to SMM estimates, spot-based smelting margins at Chinese copper smelters have now approached break-even, and smelters have become noticeably less willing to purchase spot cargoes at increasingly unfavorable TCs. The rise in sulfuric acid prices has mainly been driven by two factors. First, geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East, tight sulfur supply and higher import costs raised the cost base of sulfuric acid production. Second, demand from phosphate fertilizers, chemicals, hydrometallurgical operations and battery-material producers provided broad-based downstream support.The sharp rise in sulfuric acid prices has reshaped the economics of copper smelting in China, with acid earnings accounting for a substantially larger proportion of smelters’ non-TC/RC income. This was also an important reason why Chinese smelters did not implement large-scale voluntary production cuts during the first half of 2026 despite the continued decline in TCs. The support provided by sulfuric acid margins is not without risk, however. Should geopolitical disruptions ease in the second half of the year, sulfur supply recover, or restrictions on Chinese sulfuric acid exports result in more material being redirected to the domestic market, sulfuric acid prices could retreat from their elevated levels.If acid margins narrow while copper concentrate TCs remain deeply negative, pressure on smelter profitability will become more visible again. Some higher-cost smelters may respond by extending maintenance periods, reducing utilization rates or cutting spot concentrate purchases. Sulfuric acid prices will therefore be one of the key variables determining whether TCs can stabilize during the second half of the year. IV. Spot Market: Frequent Mine Tenders and the Emergence of Index-Minus Pricing Trading activity in the imported copper concentrate spot market was uneven during the first half of 2026, but mine tenders and trader offers remained important channels for price discovery. As spot TCs continued to decline, outright fixed-price transactions repeatedly established new market lows, while index-minus pricing gradually became the dominant quotation format. Since the second quarter, trader offers have increasingly been expressed as an average of the SMM and Fastmarkets indices minus an additional differential. This pricing method indicates that, in an environment of continuously declining spot TCs, concentrate sellers increasingly prefer index-linked formulas that preserve their exposure to further downward movements in TCs. Smelters’ purchasing behavior remained conflicted. On the one hand, deeply negative TCs continued to compress smelting margins, limiting smelters’ willingness to accept expensive spot concentrate carrying extremely unfavorable processing terms. Some companies therefore reduced the frequency of their active inquiries.On the other hand, ramp-ups at new smelting facilities, insufficient inventory safety margins and uncertainty surrounding term-contract arrivals meant that some smelters still needed to replenish stocks to meet essential production requirements. Consequently, the market did not experience a collective withdrawal of buyers sufficient to drive a meaningful recovery in TCs. Instead, continuously lower mine-tender settlements pushed the spot index further into deeply negative territory. V. H2 Outlook: Limited Marginal Supply Recovery and Persistently Deeply Negative TCs Looking ahead to the second half of 2026, the imported copper concentrate spot market will continue to be driven by the interaction between the actual realization of mine-supply recovery and the resilience of Chinese smelting demand.On the supply side, the treatment of Cobre Panamá stockpiles, progress in the Grasberg restart, incremental production from Oyu Tolgoi, and shipment stability at major Peruvian mines may provide some marginal improvement. Based on current developments, however, Cobre Panamá has not achieved a full restart, the Grasberg recovery schedule has already been revised downward, production growth at Kamoa-Kakula has slowed, and mature Chilean mines remain exposed to declining grades and safety-related disruptions. The conditions required for a substantial easing of the global copper concentrate market are therefore not yet in place. On the demand side, new and expanded Chinese primary smelting capacity will continue to support structurally strong concentrate consumption. Although some smelters may temporarily reduce production because of losses, maintenance or feedstock constraints, the ramp-up of newly commissioned projects, the fulfillment of term contracts, sulfuric acid margins and regional refined-copper price differentials will continue to weaken the impact of production cuts on TCs.Should the effect of maintenance outages gradually diminish during the third quarter while newly commissioned capacity continues to ramp up, China’s demand for imported copper concentrate is likely to remain elevated on a sequential basis. Sulfuric acid prices will remain a key variable for smelting profitability in the second half of the year. Should sulfuric acid prices remain elevated or rise further, smelters will continue to demonstrate a relatively strong capacity to absorb negative TCs, limiting the potential for a recovery in spot TCs. Conversely, should sulfuric acid prices retreat from their highs, pressure on smelter profitability will increase again. Some smelters may respond by extending maintenance, cutting operating rates or reducing spot purchases, potentially allowing TCs to stabilize or recover modestly for a period. In the spot market, mine-tender results will remain an important leading indicator for TC movements in the second half of the year. As term-contract pricing becomes increasingly index-linked and more spot transactions adopt index-minus formulas, the SMM Imported Copper Concentrate Index is expected to play an even stronger role as the principal pricing anchor for market transactions. Should mine-tender settlements remain deeply negative, spot TCs may fall further. Conversely, if incremental volumes from the Grasberg recovery, Cobre Panamá stockpile processing and Oyu Tolgoi materialize at the same time, while maintenance activity among smelters increases, TCs may stage a temporary recovery. Overall, some marginal improvement in imported copper concentrate supply is possible during the second half of 2026. Nevertheless, given the continued commissioning of new Chinese smelting capacity, the shortage of tradable concentrate, and the support that strong sulfuric acid margins provide to smelter operating rates, a sustained and substantial recovery in spot TCs appears unlikely. Spot TCs for imported copper concentrate are therefore expected to remain volatile within deeply negative territory during the second half of the year. Any temporary recovery will depend largely on the actual realization of mine restarts, the extent to which smelters implement maintenance and production cuts, and changes in sulfuric acid profitability.