[SMM Silver Weekly Review: Silver V-Shaped Rebound with a Weekly Gain of 2.9%; Non-Farm Payrolls Data May Lead to a Directional Breakthrough] This week, silver fell first and then rose, with a weekly gain of 2.9%. The US Fed's dovish stance and ADP data below expectations fueled a rebound in the second half of the week. Spot silver supply and demand were both weak, with premiums holding steady. The market is awaiting non-farm payrolls data for guidance; next week is expected to see wild swings. In terms of inventory, total social inventory stood at 3,326 mt, with a slight buildup, while downstream demand remained weak.

Fri, May 22, 2026 at 9:56 PM GMT+8 JPMorgan has reduced its gold price forecasts for 2026, pointing to softer short-term demand conditions, although the bank continues to hold a bullish longer-term outlook and still expects gold to climb toward $6,000 per troy ounce by the end of the year. The bank lowered its 2026 average gold price forecast to $5,243 per ounce from a previous estimate of $5,708, citing weaker investor participation and subdued market positioning in the near term. According to JPMorgan, gold is currently trading within a narrow technical range between its 200-day moving average near $4,340 per ounce and its 50-day moving average around $4,730 per ounce, while futures market activity and ETF inflows remain relatively muted. “Gold is on the back burner for most investors at the moment,” analysts led by Gregory Shearer wrote, adding that concerns over the possibility of Federal Reserve interest rate increases in response to energy-driven inflation are limiting investor confidence in the short term. Despite the downgrade to its forecasts, JPMorgan stressed that it views the recent weakness as a temporary pause rather than a fundamental change in trend. The bank said its constructive long-term thesis — based on fiscal risks, currency debasement concerns, geopolitical fragmentation and uncertainty surrounding U.S. policymaking — remains intact, but is “on hold until more clarity arrives around a resolution of the Iran conflict.” One of the key developments JPMorgan is monitoring is a possible reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which the bank’s oil analysts expect could occur in June. Analysts believe such a development would ease inflation-related risks and begin reversing recent gains in the U.S. dollar and real bond yields, potentially triggering a recovery in gold prices toward technical resistance levels between $4,900 and $5,100 per ounce. The bank also expects investors who previously reduced gold exposure to gradually return to the market, supporting a rebound in demand during the second half of the year. JPMorgan reduced its forecast for central bank gold purchases in 2026 to 640 tonnes from 800 tonnes previously, after officially reported net buying dropped to just 16 tonnes during the first quarter amid increased selling activity. However, including unreported purchases, total central bank buying still reached 244 tonnes during the quarter, based on estimates from the World Gold Council and Metals Focus. The bank additionally cut its forecast for ETF inflows to around 400 tonnes for the full year from an earlier projection of 580 tonnes, although it noted that global ETF holdings remain up by 108 tonnes since the start of the year. Analysts said the largest risk to their outlook would be a scenario in which strong U.S. labour market conditions and rising inflation force the Federal Reserve into a prolonged cycle of interest rate hikes, potentially leading to sustained outflows from Western gold-backed ETFs. Source： https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/goldman-maintains-bullish-gold-outlook-141040865.html

May 19, 2026 key takeaways. Gold’s recent price consolidation does not, in our view, undermine the medium-term case for higher prices Structural support remains intact, with resilient central bank and private investor demand, reflecting broad fiscal uncertainty and currency concerns The key risks to watch would be a shift to more restrictive central bank policies that pushes real yields higher for longer, or a deterioration in passive fund flows We stay constructive on gold, maintain our overweight allocation in portfolios, and keep our 12-month price target at USD 5,400/oz. Gold has been one of the defining financial assets of the last 12 months. Yet after a strong performance, especially in the second half of 2025, prices have stalled. Momentum has cooled, and the metal has at times lagged what investors might have expected from a haven asset during a period of geopolitical stress. Gold has been one of the defining financial assets of the last 12 months. Yet after a strong performance, especially in the second half of 2025, prices have stalled. Momentum has cooled, and the metal has at times lagged what investors might have expected from a haven asset during a period of geopolitical stress. Gold prices more than doubled in the year to January 2026, reaching a record USD 5,595 per ounce before declining in the wake of the Middle East conflict to a trough of USD 4,099/oz in mid-March, most recently reaching USD 4,560/oz. In contrast to comparable periods of geopolitical tension – such as the Iranian Revolution in 1979, the first and second Gulf Wars, or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – gold has seen a larger drawdown with much higher levels of volatility. It has fallen by over 10% since the conflict began. We believe this reflects market concerns over inflation and crowded investor positioning at the start of 2026. As a non-yielding asset, gold performs best when real yields decline and the US dollar depreciates. However, an energy supply shock can have the opposite effect, resulting in markets pricing higher central bank rate expectations, higher yields and a firmer US dollar. It is therefore unsurprising that gold has shown a strong negative relationship with rising energy prices. If the Middle East conflict de-escalates and energy prices fall, in line with our base scenario, gold could recover, supported by some normalising of previously high investor positioning. Gold prices more than doubled in the year to January 2026, reaching a record USD 5,595 per ounce… Still, the Middle East conflict is not the only variable for prices. The medium-term outlook is also determined by whether demand and the broader geopolitical and fundamental macroeconomic environment have changed. Here, we do not see a shift and therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our 12-month price target of USD 5,400/oz, and our overweight allocation in portfolios. To understand gold’s recent loss of momentum, it helps to separate structural from short-term drivers. At the structural level, demand from both central banks and private investors remains resilient. This explains how short-term headwinds – including a stronger dollar and higher bond yields – can create temporary weakness without undermining longer-run demand. In other words, slowing momentum should not be mistaken for a structural reversal. Structural incentives to hold gold The most compelling structural case for gold lies in incentives for investors, private and public, to hold a real asset. Yet unlike most currencies, where supply can expand due to monetary and fiscal easing, gold supply has been stable through history: industry estimates suggest some 220,000 tonnes of gold have been mined throughout history, with new mine output adding just over 1% to above-ground stocks each year . Moreover, unlike currencies, gold is not subject to financial sanctions. US sanctions on Russia accelerated central banks’ desire to hold reserve assets such as gold that are insulated from such threats while preserving value. As more countries gradually diversify away from use of the US dollar and settle trade in other currencies, demand for neutral reserve assets such as gold rises. At the structural level, demand from both central banks and private investors remains resilient At the same time, lower confidence in some currencies has supported private investor demand, especially as gold helps portfolio diversification. Persistent fiscal uncertainty and still-high inflation reinforce this trend. When investors question the long-term path of public debt, the capacity to finance deficits, or policy credibility, demand for diversified assets increases. In this environment, gold can provide a hedge against risks that are hard to manage – including inflation surprises, poor management of government finances that ends up constraining monetary policy, or declining confidence in institutions. The price of gold, for example, has recently correlated with fears around the Federal Reserve’s independence. Persistent demand trends contribute to price appreciation Over the past decade, there has been a strong link between total gold volumes bought by both private investors and central banks, and real gold prices. Approximately 400 metric tonnes of quarterly demand is consistent with price stability, with every additional 100 tonnes associated with roughly a three-percentage-point rise in quarterly prices. Since 2023, demand has averaged about 620 tonnes a quarter, well above the 450-tonne average between 2010 and 2022. Despite concerns about weaker demand this year, World Gold Council data shows total demand of 790 tonnes over the first quarter of 2026, of which central banks purchased a net 244 tonnes, a 3% increase year on year. Private demand was roughly in line with 2025’s average. Lower ETF flows were offset by higher demand for physical gold, with China accounting for 40% of the total. Central banks can create a higher ‘floor’ From 1980 to 2005, central banks reduced their gold reserves, and that trend accelerated after the Cold War with globalisation, and US security guarantees for allies. However, recent years have re-set international relations, and central banks have rapidly increased their gold purchases . The rationale is straightforward: reserve managers’ gold purchases reflect concerns about US financial sanctions, broader geopolitical uncertainty, and unpredictable trade policies. The share of gold in overall reserves held by emerging market central banks is still less than their developed market peers While demand has been strongest in emerging countries, a structurally higher baseline of purchases by central banks across many countries can reduce the depth and duration of any price falls, particularly if private investor flows become volatile. Importantly, the share of gold in overall reserves held by emerging market central banks is still less than their developed market peers, suggesting more room for buying. As a result, such demand is likely to remain. Recently, some emerging market countries, such as Turkey, have sold or swapped gold reserves to manage currency depreciation pressures exacerbated by the conflict in the Middle East. We see such moves as exceptions to the broader trend of purchases in countries with free-floating exchange rates. Real yields and monetary credibility The outlook for interest rates and their impact on private investor flows will be another key factor for gold prices. Gold is sensitive to real yields: when they fall, the opportunity cost of holding gold declines, supporting prices. This link has re-asserted itself in recent months. In principle, a more restrictive Federal Reserve monetary policy could weigh on gold prices if it resulted in persistently higher real yields. However, we see this risk as limited. The Fed is likely to keep policy rates on hold for much of 2026, with any rate cut more likely towards the end of the year. Rate moves matter for investor flows into the gold market. Physically-backed ETFs, which allow investors to gain exposure to gold without owning the metal, tend to be sensitive to rate expectations. Even after strong inflows, total ETF holdings are not back to their historical highs. Broadly stable flows would support demand. We therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our overweight allocation and our 12‑month price target of USD 5,400/oz The structural case remains intact We do not expect the recent gold price consolidation to alter its medium-term trajectory. Cooling investor sentiment does not undermine the structural case for gold, but instead shifts focus back to slower-moving drivers including central bank demand, portfolio allocation and fiscal uncertainty. Three factors support this view. First, demand remains resilient despite volatility. Second, the macro context still favours real assets amid fiscal uncertainty and the gradual erosion of purchasing power. Third, recent headwinds look short term rather than structural – including higher yields and a stronger US dollar, which we see as temporary. Risks remain. Negative factors to watch would be higher-for-longer real yields, a prolonged decline in ETF demand, or lower physical demand, for example for jewellery, even if that were partly offset by central bank buying. We therefore remain constructive on gold, maintaining our overweight allocation and our 12-month price target of USD 5,400/oz. Our structural case for the precious metal rests on resilient demand, fiscal uncertainty and the gradual erosion of US dollar purchasing power. Source： https://www.lombardodier.com/insights/2026/may/gold-s-slowdown.html

May 15, 2026 While the silver market has long assumed a massive supply deficit and sharply rising prices, the major Swiss bank UBS is now significantly revising its forecasts for the precious metal downward. The reason: According to analysts, weaker underlying demand is being offset by rising mine production. The supply gap is shrinking dramatically At the heart of the reassessment is the adjustment of the expected market deficit. While UBS had previously assumed a supply gap of 300 million ounces for 2026, this shortfall has shrunk to just 60 to 70 million ounces in the current estimate. This decline results from two opposing trends. On the supply side, the bank sees a more favorable environment and expects global mine production to rise to around 850 million ounces of silver by 2026. At the same time, high silver prices are putting the brakes on consumption. In the photovoltaic, silverware, and jewelry sectors alone, the bank anticipates an aggregate loss in demand of about 50 million ounces. Investors are pulling back Consequently, investment demand is also declining noticeably. Analysts have cut their estimate for the full year from over 400 million to 300 million ounces—a figure that UBS still describes as “generous” in light of recent market movements. Current data supports this skepticism: Global ETF holdings have fallen by nearly 70 million ounces to around 794 million ounces. At the same time, the net positioning of speculative futures investors has retreated to just over 100 million ounces. Silver is thus losing momentum simultaneously in industrial applications and investment vehicles. The New Price Targets: Sideways Instead of a Steep Rise Against this backdrop, the upside potential is diminishing, according to UBS. In the base scenario, the strategists no longer expect a steep upward trend, but rather a broad sideways movement—albeit at a high level. The price targets have been capped accordingly across all time frames: End of Q2 2026: $85 per ounce (previously $100) September 2026: $85 (previously $95) End of 2026: $80 (previously $85) March 2027: $75 (previously $85) Gold as an Anchor and New Trading Strategy Despite the subdued outlook, the Swiss bank does not expect a sharp drop in silver prices. Gold acts as a stabilizer: Analysts continue to anticipate a general upward trend in prices for the yellow metal. Given the recently renewed correlation between the two metals, this also provides a downside hedge for silver. According to the bank, the gold-silver ratio is expected to stabilize in the range of 75 to 80 in the medium term. From the perspective of UBS strategists, selling downside risks to generate returns is currently more attractive than building pure long positions. While implied volatility has calmed down since the extremes seen at the start of the year (in February, realized one-month volatility was nearly 150%), it remains at a high level from a historical perspective. The bank therefore favors strategies for the coming three months that capitalize on this volatility rather than betting directly on further rising silver prices. Source： https://goldinvest.de/en/silver-under-scrutiny-why-analysts-are-lowering-their-forecasts

Silver price forecasts across key horizons have been sharply cut by UBS, driven by subdued investment demand, weaker industrial usage, and climbing mine production.

[Price Review] During the week, silver prices remained in the doldrums. In China, the Ag (T+D) contract on the Shanghai Gold Exchange broke below the support level of 18,000 yuan/kg, while LBMA silver prices kept probing lower after falling below $75/oz. From a macro perspective, escalating geopolitical conflict in the Middle East pushed oil prices to repeated new highs, while intensifying inflation concerns significantly cooled expectations for US Fed interest rate cuts and delayed the timing of the first cut to year-end. The simultaneous strength in the US dollar index and US Treasury yields became the core factors suppressing silver prices. On Wednesday local time, the US Fed announced that it would keep interest rates unchanged. In the statement released that day, it noted that the impact of the Middle East situation on the US economy remained uncertain and that uncertainty surrounding the US economic outlook was still elevated. In addition, speculative demand and ETF holdings continued to decline, and market sentiment kept cooling. As for the gold/silver ratio, because silver posted a deeper decline, the ratio continued to rise. As of March 18, the LBMA gold/silver ratio had climbed to 63, a recent high. [Important Data] Bullish: US preliminary March one-year inflation expectations came in at 3.4%, above expectations and unchanged from the previous reading Bearish: US API crude oil inventory for the week ended March 13 increased by 6.556 million barrels, above expectations and the previous reading US EIA crude oil inventory for the week ended March 13 increased by 6.156 million barrels, above expectations and the previous reading Data and macro releases to watch next week include: Continued hawkishness from the US Fed, the ECB rate decision, US inflation/employment data, COMEX silver delivery, together with the Boao Forum and geopolitical risks On March 19, the FOMC kept rates unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%, raised its 2026 PCE forecast to 2.7%, and expectations for US Fed interest rate cuts cooled sharply. US-Iran Situation: As of March 19, the military strikes by the US and Israel against Iran had entered their 19th day, with high-intensity confrontation, no sign of a ceasefire, and the conflict spreading to multiple Gulf countries. In terms of the current impact on precious metals, financial suppression outweighed safe-haven demand. Against the backdrop of surging inflation expectations, the US dollar and US Treasury yields continued to rise, the timing of US Fed interest rate cuts was delayed, and silver prices were suppressed. [Price Forecast] Silver prices are expected to maintain a fluctuating trend in the doldrums amid the interplay between macro disruptions and fundamentals. On the macro front, caution is still warranted over the risk of continued US dollar strength and heightened volatility from any further escalation in the US-Iran conflict. On the fundamentals side, as PV export rush orders gradually approached their end, rigid demand for raw material procurement by silver nitrate enterprises declined in late March, weakening support from industrial demand. In China's spot market, as investment demand and rigid industrial demand softened, coupled with replenishment from imported silver ingots, circulating supply of silver ingots in the spot market became ample, and suppliers generally lowered spot premium quotes to facilitate transactions. The abnormally high spot premiums in China's spot market will come to an end. At the same time, profitability on imported silver ingots will also decline sharply, and spot premium quotes in actual spot silver ingot transactions are expected to return to rational levels.