(Kitco News) – BRICS+ nations now hold 17.4% of global gold reserves, up from 11.2% in 2019, while the dollar’s share of global reserves fell to its lowest level since 1994 – and one BRICS member could well buy as much as all other countries combined, according to Michael Harris, technical analyst at EBC Financial Group.
Apr 8, 2026 10:07Members of the BRICS Plus trade bloc now hold over 6 000 t of gold, representing about 17.4% of total global central bank reserves, up from 11.2% in 2019, financial services group EBC Financial Group (EBC) reveals in a market note.
Apr 8, 2026 09:41Gold has overtaken US Treasuries as the largest component of global central bank reserves for the first time since the mid-1990s, marking a significant shift in the structure of the international monetary system, Bloomberg reports.
Apr 7, 2026 09:46According to Iran’s state television, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei said that US President Trump’s earlier statement on social media claiming that the “president of Iran’s new regime had requested a ceasefire” was entirely fabricated fake news.
Apr 2, 2026 19:12The global aluminum market is currently characterized by a distinct divergence between Chinese and overseas markets. Overseas markets have performed strongly amid supply-side disruptions, while the domestic market has also strengthened due to similar supply disturbances but remained relatively weak compared with the LME. Details on supply, demand, trade and market structure are as follows: I. Overseas Aluminum Market: Prominent Supply Tightness and Sustained Pressure on Inventories The core contradiction in overseas aluminum markets lies in supply contraction and low inventory levels, exacerbated by geopolitical conflicts, further intensifying supply tightness. In terms of LME inventory data, current inventories remain on a continuous downward trend, greatly weakening their supportive role in the market. Historically and recently, LME cancelled warrants peaked at 178,000 tonnes earlier, accounting for 39% of total inventory. As a result, the effectively available LME inventory has dropped to its lowest level since May 2025, further highlighting tight overseas supply. Supply contraction has widened the market deficit, with production cuts at two key projects—EGA and Alba—having a particularly significant impact.On March 28, EGA’s Al Taweelah smelter in the UAE and Alba’s plant in Bahrain were attacked, causing equipment damage and sharply raising risks of capacity disruptions. This came on top of earlier disruptions: March 15: Alba reduced output at three production lines due to shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz; March 12: Qatar’s Qatalum smelter suspended 40% of capacity due to natural gas supply cuts. Overseas primary aluminum supply deficits are expected to continue widening. Meanwhile, high energy costs in Europe have also reduced local semi-fabricated aluminum output, further tightening supply. Supply tightness has directly driven a sharp rise in overseas spot premiums. Amid supply concerns from escalating Middle East geopolitical conflicts, the Q2 MJP premium rose by approximately USD 156.5/t to USD 351.5/t. Specifically, major regional premiums rose markedly at end-March: CIF South Korea: from USD 168/t (early March) to USD 292/t; CIF Thailand: from USD 183/t to USD 317/t; European Duty Unpaid: from USD 345/t to USD 400/t; US Midwest DDP: from 103.75 cents/lb to 105.5 cents/lb. This fully reflects that expectations of tight primary aluminum supply have enabled sellers to push up quotations. Downstream demand and purchasing patterns vary significantly across regions: South Korea: Phase-wise restocking completed; weak downstream restocking sentiment, limited demand support. Southeast Asia: Dominated by term contract execution with limited spot restocking; insufficient incremental buying momentum. Europe: Rising supply shortage concerns amid production cuts in Qatar and Bahrain; downstream restocking underway, relatively strong demand. United States: Low inventories entering a restocking cycle, providing moderate market support. II. Chinese Aluminum Market: High Inventory Pressure, Weak and Constrained Demand In contrast to strong overseas markets, the domestic aluminum market has strengthened amid supply disruptions but underperformed relative to the LME, characterized by high inventories and constrained demand. High domestic aluminum prices have continued to suppress downstream purchasing. Current buying is mainly order-based rigid demand, with low willingness for active restocking, providing limited upward support. Domestic inventory pressure has not eased effectively: primary aluminum inventories remain elevated, and inventory destocking has progressed slower than expected, likely prolonging the digestion period.High inventories and high prices form dual constraints. Although the domestic market has upward momentum, it is weaker than overseas. Domestic spot premiums are expected to remain under pressure and further widen in the short term.
Apr 1, 2026 00:01The current global aluminum market showed a clear divergence between markets outside and inside China. LME remained strong amid supply-side disruptions, while the Chinese market also strengthened under supply disruptions, though its overall performance was still relatively weaker than LME. Details on supply and demand, trade flows, and market structure are as follows: I. Overseas Aluminum Market: Tight Supply Became More Pronounced, Inventory Remained Under Pressure The core issue in the overseas aluminum market centered on supply contraction and low inventory, compounded by disruptions from geopolitical conflicts, with the tight supply pattern continuing to intensify. Based on LME inventory data, current inventory remained on a sustained downward trend, and the support provided by inventory to the market weakened significantly. Historical and recent data showed that LME cancelled warrants previously peaked at 178,000 mt, accounting for as much as 39 of total inventory. As a result, LME's actually available effective inventory fell to the lowest level since May 2025, further highlighting the tight supply situation outside China. The contraction on the supply side further amplified the deficit in markets outside China, with the impact of production cuts at the two key projects, EGA and Alba, being particularly prominent. On March 28, EGA's Al Taweelah production site in the UAE and Alba's plant in Bahrain were both attacked, and equipment damage sharply increased the risk of capacity disruptions. In addition, Alba had already started production cuts on three lines on March 15 due to shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, while Qatar's Qatalum aluminum smelter shut 40 of its capacity on March 12 due to a natural gas supply interruption. Against this backdrop, the supply gap in overseas aluminum ingot is expected to continue widening. Meanwhile, high energy costs in Europe also led to production cuts and volume reductions in local fabricated products, further exacerbating supply tightness. Tight supply directly pushed premiums in overseas spot markets sharply higher. Affected by supply concerns triggered by the escalation of geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, the Q2 MJP price rose by about $156.5/mt to $351.5/mt. Specifically, by month-end, premiums in major regions all showed a significant upward trend: CIF South Korea premiums rose from $168/mt at the beginning of the month to $292/mt; CIF Thailand premiums rose from $183/mt to $317/mt; Europe duty-unpaid premiums rose from $345/mt to $400/mt; and US Midwest DDP premiums rose from 103.75¢/lb at the beginning of the month to 105.5¢/lb, fully reflecting that current expectations of tight overseas aluminum ingot supply pushed sellers to raise offers. From the perspective of downstream demand and procurement pace across overseas regions, clear divergence was evident: South Korea: phased restocking had already been completed earlier, and downstream purchase and restocking sentiment was currently weak, with demand providing limited support to the market; Southeast Asia: the market was currently focused on digesting inventories, with only partial spot order restocking demand, and overall momentum for new purchases was insufficient; Europe: affected by production cuts in Qatar and Bahrain's aluminum industries, market concerns over a supply deficit continued to intensify, and downstream players were gradually carrying out restocking purchases, with demand showing relatively strong performance; US: inventory was currently at a low level and was entering a restocking cycle, providing some support to the market. II. China’s Aluminum Market: Under Pressure from Inventory at High Levels, with Suppressed and Weak Demand In contrast to the strength of the LME, although China’s aluminum market was likewise supported by supply disruptions and showed an upward trend, its overall performance remained relatively weaker than the LME, with the core pattern characterized by “elevated inventory and suppressed demand.” On the price front, persistently high aluminum prices in China continued to restrain downstream purchasing demand. At present, the downstream procurement pace is mainly driven by order-based just-in-time procurement, while willingness to restock proactively remains subdued, making it difficult to form stronger demand support. China has not effectively eased inventory pressure—domestic aluminum ingot remains at inventory at high levels, and the pace of inventory drawdown was slower than expectations. Inventory drawdown is expected to take even longer going forward. Inventory at high levels and high aluminum prices have formed a dual constraint, leaving the Chinese market with upward momentum, but weaker than that of the LME. In the short term, spot premiums in China are expected to remain under pressure and widen further. Source: SMM
Mar 31, 2026 23:55SMM Clarification Statement SMM Information & Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "SMM" or "the Company"), as a professional spot market price reporting agency and information provider, has recently noticed the circulation of false information regarding the fairness of SMM's price assessment. To avoid market misunderstandings, maintain a healthy and transparent market environment, and protect the Company's legitimate rights and interests, SMM hereby makes the following solemn clarification and statement: I. The Difference Between Spot Prices and Futures Prices is a Normal Reflection of Market Mechanisms According to basic economic principles, spot prices reflect the immediate supply-demand relationship and deliverable transaction conditions of the underlying asset, while futures prices reflect market expectations for future supply and demand, including factors such as capital cost and carrying costs. Both follow the principle of "convergence at maturity," meaning that futures prices gradually converge towards spot prices as the contract expiration date approaches. Therefore, during the life of the contract, the difference between spot prices and futures prices, especially with far-month contracts, is a normal phenomenon under the market pricing mechanism. II. Historical Data Proves the Rationality of the Price Spread Structure To objectively present the facts, SMM has made a price spread analysis chart based on publicly available market data: The chart clearly shows that from September 2023 to 2025, the monthly price spread between the SMM battery-grade lithium carbonate average price and the GFEX lithium carbonate futures contract prices fluctuated between positive and negative territory, always remaining within a reasonable range, and exhibited a significant convergence trend as the contract expiration date approached. This fully aligns with the market rule of futures and spot price convergence. Comparing a certain periods' futures prices (especially those of far-month most-traded contracts) with spot assessment prices and concluding that there is a "consistent significant deviation" is fundamentally flawed in methodology and can easily mislead market judgment. Any behavior that selectively highlights short-term trends in the price spread without considering the broader context is partial and irresponsible, failing to reflect the overall market situation. III. Recent Market Risk Control Measures Recently, to maintain the stable operation of the lithium carbonate futures market and prevent potential risks, the Guangzhou Futures Exchange, in accordance with its risk management rules, issued multiple notifications consecutively between November and December 2025, implementing a series of risk control measures for relevant contracts, including adjustments to transaction fee standards and trading limits. These measures represent the exchange's commitment to fulfill its self-regulatory duties in accordance with the law during specific market periods, aiming to promote the steady development of the market. IV. The Emergence, Nature, and Harm of False Information It is noteworthy that during this sensitive period, when the aforementioned risk control measures were being intensively implemented, a significant amount of false information began circulating on the Internet. While such information varies in content, it shares an identical core narrative: False claims have been made that SMM’s prices "consistently and significantly deviate from fair value and futures prices" and that "there are illegal benefit-related connections with certain institutions". These claims are entirely groundless. The timing and manner of their dissemination indicate that their purpose is not professional discussion but rather an attempt to exert improper pressure on SMM by confusing the price logic of spot and futures markets, interfere with the neutrality of spot price assessments, and consequently potentially mislead market expectations and disrupt the normal relationship between futures and spot prices. SMM hereby solemnly declares that SMM is always committed to price discovery in the spot market, does not participate in any futures market trading operations, and resolutely maintains market order. V. The Compliance, Neutrality, and Supervision Mechanisms of SMM's Price Assessment As a professional market price assessment agency, SMM always adheres to the principles of neutrality, objectivity, and fairness. SMM's price assessment methodology strictly follows the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) "Principles for Financial Benchmarks" and is subject to audits by independent third-party audit firms. In terms of internal governance, SMM has established a comprehensive firewall system to ensure that personnel and management involved in the price assessment process do not hold any related futures or spot positions, thereby eliminating conflicts of interest at an institutional level. SMM also has no history of any penalties from securities regulatory authorities for violations. We consistently maintain an open attitude towards market supervision based on facts. VI. Appeal to the Public SMM strongly condemns the recent malicious fabrication and dissemination of false information in the market, which damages SMM's commercial reputation and attempts to disrupt the order of the futures and spot markets, and has initiated legal proceedings to protect its rights. Currently, SMM is comprehensively and continuously collecting and preserving evidence related to the infringements. For suspected infringing acts, the Company will take all legal measures, including but not limited to reporting to relevant regulatory authorities and filing complaints with relevant online platforms, to resolutely pursue the legal liability of the infringing parties. SMM reserves the right to pursue all legal consequences against the relevant responsible parties. We once again call on all market participants to enhance their legal awareness and professional discernment capabilities, obtain information from authoritative channels, analyze the market rationally, resolutely resist and refuse to spread any unverified and unfounded rumors, and jointly maintain a fair, orderly, and healthy development environment for the industry chain. SMM Information & Technology Co., Ltd. Dec 26, 2025
Dec 26, 2025 17:30